The early results of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty in Thai patients

Knee

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 483-487

  Tanavalee, Aree ^a   Rojpornpradit, Thana ^b   Khumrak, Sukree ^c   Ngarmukos, Srihatach ^a  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Srindhron Hospital   (Thailand)

^c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Female; Femoral component; Gender specific; Knee prosthesis; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENDER; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LIMB MOVEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN SIZE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THAI; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS KNEE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEX FACTORS; THAILAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 82455210561     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tosi L.L., Bovan B.D., Boskey A.L. Dose sex matter in musculoskeletal health. The influence of sex and gender on musculoskeletal health?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1631-1647.
2. Kurtz S., Mowat F., Ong K., Chan N., Lau E., Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1487-1497.
3. MacDonald S.J., Charron K.D., Bourne R.B., Naudie D.D., McCalden R.W., Rorabeck C.H. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2612-2616.
4. Robertsson O., Dunbar M., Pehrsson T., Knutson K., Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:262-267.
5. Bourne R.B., McCalden R.W., MacDonald S.J., Mokete L., Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:27-31.
6. Ritter M.A., Wing J.T., Berend M.E., Davis K.E., Meding J.B. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:331-336.
7. Dalury D.F., Mason J.B., Murphy J.A., Adams M.J. Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:357-360.
8. Chin K.R., Dalury D.F., Zurakowski D., Scott R.D. Intraoperative measurement of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2002, 15:213-217.
9. Hitt K., Shurman I.I., Greene K., McCarthy J., Moskal J., Hoeman T., et al. Anthropometric measurements of human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:115-122.
10. Rosenstein A.D., Veazey B., Shephard D., Xu K.T. Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing. Orthopedics 2008, 31:652.
11. Lonner J.H., Jasko J.G., Thomas B.S. Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2724-2729.
12. Fehring T.K., Odum S.M., Hughes J., Springer B.D., Beaver W.B. Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:2335-2341.
13. Urabe K., Miura H., Kuwano T., Matsuda S., Nagamine R., Sakai S., et al. Comparison between the shape of resected femoral sections and femoral prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients: simulation using three-dimensional computed tomography. J Knee Surg 2003, 16:27-33.
14. Ho W.P., Cheng C.K., Liau J.J. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee 2006, 13:12-14.
15. Conley S., Rosenberg A., Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15(suppl1):S31-S36.
16. Bellemans J., Carpentier K., Vandenneucker H., Vanlauwe J., Victor J. The John Insall Award: both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:29-36.
17. Clarke H.D., Hentz J.G. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2711-2716.
18. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13-14.
19. Tanavalee A., Yuktanandana P., Ngarmukos C. Surgical epicondylar axis vs anatomical epicondylar axis for rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 2001, 84(Suppl 1):S401-S408.
20. Tanavalee A., Thiengwittayaporn S., Ngarmukos S., Siddhiphongse B. Contralateral total knee arthroplasty after unilateral surgery in bilateral varus gonathrosis. J Med Assoc Thai 2004, 87:902-909.
21. Tanavalee A., Thiengwittayaporn S., Itiravivong P. Progressive quadriceps incision during minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: the effect on early postoperative ambulation. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1013-1018.
22. Emerson R.H., Martinez J. Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2706-2710.
23. Merchant A.C., Arendt E.A., Dye S.F., Fredericson M., Grelsamer R.P., Leadbetter W.B. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:3059-3065.