Fleeting, Fading, or Far-Reaching? A Knowledge-Based Model of the Persistence of Framing Effects

Communication Theory

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 359-382

  Baden, Christian ^a   Lecheler, Sophie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84867589298     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01413.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Althaus, S. L., & Kim, Y. M. (2006). Priming effects in complex information environments: Reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. The Journal of Politics, 68(4), 960-976.
2. Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1999). Practice and retention: A unifying analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1120-1136. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1120.
3. Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition of retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), 608-629. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608.
4. Baden, C. (2008, May). Semantic association and weighted consideration: How framing shifts people's information bases in opinion formation. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
5. Baden, C. (2010). Communication, contextualization, & cognition: Patterns & processes of frames' influence on people's interpretations of the EU Constitution. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
6. Brewer, P. R., Graf, J., & Willnat, L. (2003). Priming or framing: Media influence on attitudes towards foreign countries. International Communication Gazette, 65(6), 493-508. doi: 10.1177/0016549203065006005.
7. Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257-273. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90146-4.
8. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637-655. doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070554.
9. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
10. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007c). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. The Journal of Communication, 57, 99-118. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x.
11. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663-680. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000493.
12. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
13. de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7, 191-214. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0702_4.
14. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671-686. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404041413.
15. Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2011). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. The Journal of Communication, 61(4), 659-688. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x.
16. Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., St. Charles, K., & Webber, J. (2010). Competing rhetoric over time: Frames versus cues. The Journal of Politics, 72(1), 136-148. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990521.
17. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729-745. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00051.
18. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
19. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. The Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
20. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart, & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
21. Goodmon, L. B., & Anderson, M. C. (2011). Semantic integration as a boundary condition on inhibitory processes in episodic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 416-436. doi: 10.1037/a0021963.
22. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258-268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258.
23. Hwang, H., Gotlieb, M. R., Nah, S., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Applying a cognitive-processing model to presidential debate effects: Postdebate news analysis and primed reflection. The Journal of Communication, 57, 40-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00328.x.
24. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. Chicago, CA: University of Chicago Press.
25. Kellermann, K., & Lim, T.-S. (1989). Inference generating knowledge structures in message processing. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 102-128). London, England: Sage Publications.
26. Laming, D. (2009). Failure to recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 157-186. doi: 10.1037/a0014150.
27. Lecheler, S. K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. The Journal of Communication, 61, 959-983. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x.
28. Lecheler, S. K., & de Vreese, C. H. (forthcoming). What a difference a day makes? The effects of repetitive and competitive news framing over time. Communication Research.
29. Lecheler, S. K., de Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400-425. doi: 10.1177/0093650209333028.
30. Matthes, J. (2007). Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications, 32, 51-78. doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2007.003.
31. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behaviour, 19(3), 221-246. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834831093.
32. Norman, K. A., Newman, E. L., & Detre, G. (2007). A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Review, 114(4), 887-953. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.887.
33. O'Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information., 36(4), 979-991. doi: 10.1037/a0019763.
34. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
35. Portrat, S., Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2008). Time-related decay or inference-based forgetting in working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1561-1564. doi: 10.1037/a0013356.
36. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett, & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
37. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Models for recall and recognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 205-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.001225.
38. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. The Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x.
39. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00726.x.
40. Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. The Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123-137. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x.
41. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x.
42. Tesser, A., & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340-356. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-X.
43. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804-829.
44. Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
45. Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299-314. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299.
46. Watt, J. H., Mazza, M., & Snyder, L. (1993). Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the effects decay curve. Communication Research, 20, 408-435. doi: 10.1177/009365093020003004.
47. Woltz, D. J. (1996). Perceptual and conceptual priming in a semantic reprocessing task. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 429-440. doi: 10.3758/BF03200932.
48. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.