What a Difference a Day Makes? The Effects of Repetitive and Competitive News Framing Over Time

Communication Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 147-175

  Lecheler, Sophie ^a   de Vreese, Claes H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

duration; experiment; framing effects; moderator; multiple exposure; political knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874531907     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650212470688     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Baden C. Shifting the valence balance: Resonance, resistance and countervalence of cognitive responses to communication frames. Paper presented at the 59th ICA Annual Conference; 2009Chicago, IL; 2009.
2. Bennet W. L.,Iyengar S.A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication.Journal of Communication. 2008;58:707-731.
3. Bennet W. L.,Iyengar S.The shifting foundations of political communication: Responding to a defense of the media effects paradigm.Journal of Communication. 2010;60:35-39.
4. Berinsky A. J.,Kinder D. R.Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis.The Journal of Politics. 2006;68:640-656.
5. Brewer P. R.Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values?.Political Psychology. 2001;22:45-64.
6. Cappella J. N.,Jamieson K. H.Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1997:.
7. Carlson K. A.,Russo J. E.Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2001;7 (2): 91-103.
8. Chong D.,Druckman J. N.Framing theory.Annual Review of Political Science. 2007a;10:103-126.
9. Chong D.,Druckman J. N.A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments.Journal of Communication. 2007b;57:99-118.
10. Chong D.,Druckman J. N. Dynamic public opinion: Framing effects over time. Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2008Boston, MA; 2008.
11. Delli Carpini M. X.,Keeter S.Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first.American Journal of Political Science. 1993;37:1179-1206.
12. de Vreese C. H.The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment.Mass Communication & Society. 2004;7:191-214.
13. de Vreese C. H.,Boomgaarden H.Valenced news frames and public support for the EU: Linking content analysis and experimental data.Communications. The European Journal of Communication. 2003;3:261-281.
14. de Vreese C. H.,Boomgaarden H. G.Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of the European Union.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2006a;44:419-436.
15. de Vreese C. H.,Boomgaarden H.How content moderates the effects of television news on political knowledge and engagement.Acta Politica: International Journal of Political Science. 2006b;41:317-341.
16. de Vreese C. H.,Peter J.,Semetko H. A.Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A crossnational comparative study of frames in the news.Political Communication. 2001;18 (2): 107-122.
17. Druckman J. N.On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?.Journal of Politics. 2001;63:1041-1066.
18. Druckman J. N.,Bolsen T. Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 67th Annual National Conference; 2009The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL; 2009.
19. Druckman J. N.,Nelson K. R.Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence.American Journal of Political Science. 2003;47:729-745.
20. Entman R. M.Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication. 1993;43:51-58.
21. Fazio R. H.Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Petty R. E.Krosnick J. A., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995:247-282.
22. Feldman J. M.,Lynch J. G.Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention and behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1988;73:421-435.
23. Gaines B. J.,Kuklinski J. H.,Quirk P. J.The logic of the survey experiment reexamined.Political Analysis. 2007;15:1-20.
24. Haider-Markel D. P,Joslyn M. R.Gun policy, opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames.Journal of Politics. 2001;63 (2): 520-543.
25. Hansen K. M.The Sophisticated public: The effect of competing frames on public opinion.Scandinavian Political Studies. 2007;30:377-396.
26. Hastie R.,Parks B.The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.Psychological Review. 1986;93:258-68.
27. Haugtvedt C. P.,Wegener D. T.Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective.The Journal of Consumer Research. 1994;21 (1): 205-218.
28. Holbert R. L.,Garrett R. K.,Gleason L. S.A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar.Journal of Communication. 2010;60:15-34.
29. Hobolt S. B.Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration.European Journal of Political Research. 2007;46:151-182.
30. Holland R. W.,Verplanken B.,van Knippenberg A.From repetition to conviction: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2003;39:594-601.
31. Howard M. W.,Kahana M. J.A distributed representation of temporal context.Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 2002;46:269-299.
32. Iyengar S.Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:.
33. Kahneman D.,Tversky A.Choices, values and frames.American Psychologist. 1984;39:341-350.
34. Kinder D. R.,Sanders L. M.Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for Blacks.Social Cognition. 1990;8:73-103.
35. Kunda Z.The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin. 1990;108:480-498.
36. Lecheler S.,de Vreese C. H.,Slothuus R.Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects.Communication Research. 2009;36:400-425.
37. Lecheler S.,de Vreese C. H.Getting Real: The Duration of Framing Effects.Journal of Communication. 2011;61:959-983.
38. Lodge M.,Steenbergen M. R.,Brau S.The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation.American Political Science Review. 1995;89:309-326.
39. Matthes J.Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects.Communications. 2007;32:51-78.
40. Matthes J. Diachronic framing effects in competitive opinion environments: The moderatingrole of attitude certainty. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA); 2010Singapore; 2010.
41. McDermott R.Experimental methodology in political science.Political Analysis. 2002;10:325-342.
42. Murdock B. B.The distinctiveness of stimuli.Psychological Review. 1960;67:16-31.
43. Nabi R. L.Exploring the framing effects of emotion.Communication Research. 2003;30:224-247.
44. Neath I.Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition.Memory & Cognition. 1993 1993;21:689-698.
45. Nelson T. E.,Oxley Z. M.,Clawson R. A.Toward a psychology of framing effects.Political Behaviour. 1997;19:221-246.
46. Neuman W. R.,Just M. R.,Crigler A. N.Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1992:.
47. Noelle-Neumann E.Return to the concept of powerful mass media.Studies of Broadcasting. 1973;9:67-112.
48. Peter J.Our long "return to the concept of powerful mass media"- a cross-national comparative investigation of the effects of consonant media coverage.International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2004;16 (2): 144-168.
49. Price V.,Tewksbury D.Progress in communication sciences. Barnett G.Boster F., ed. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1997:173-212.
50. Price V.,Tewksbury D.,Powers E.Switching trains of thought.Communication Research. 1997;24:481-506.
51. Scheufele D. A.Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at the cognitive effects of political communication.Mass Communication and Society. 2000;3:297-316.
52. Schuck A. R. T.,De Vreese C. H.Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement.European Journal of Communication. 2006;21 (1): 5-23.
53. Semetko H. A.,Valkenburg P. M.Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news.Journal of Communication. 2000;50:93-109.
54. Shen F.,Edwards H. H.Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects.Journal of Communication. 2005;55:795-809.
55. Singer J. D.,Willitt J. B.Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
56. Slothuus R.More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual process model of issue framing effects.Political Psychology. 2008;29 (1): 1-28.
57. Sniderman P. M.,Theriault S. M.Studies in Public Opinion. Saris W. E.Sniderman P. M., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004:133-165.
58. Soroka S. N.Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information.Journal of Politics. 2006;68:372-385.
59. Tao C. C.,Bucy E.Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions.Human Communication Research. 2007;33:397-426.
60. Taber C. S.,Cann D.,Kucsova S.The motivated processing of political arguments.Political Behavior. 2009;31 (2): 137-155.
61. Taber C. S.,Lodge M.Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50:755-769.
62. Taris T.A primer in longitudinal analysis. London, UK:; 2000:.
63. Tewksbury D.,Scheufele D.Media effects: Advances in theory and research. 2009). News framing theory and research. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-33, 3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Bryant J.Oliver M. B., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009:17-33.
64. Tewksbury D.,Jones J.,Peske M. W.,Raymond A.,Vig W.The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000;77:804-829.
65. Valkenburg P. M.,Semetko H. A.,de Vreese C. H.The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall.Communication Research. 1999;26:550-569.
66. Zaller J. R.The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.
67. Zaller J.Political persuasion and attitude change. Mutz D.Brody R.Sniderman P., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1996:17-79.