Accessibility of Outdated Information

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 979-991

  O'Brien, Edward J ^a   Cook, Anne E ^b   Guéraud, Sabine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

Author keywords

Accessibility of text information; Memory based processes; Updating

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; SEMANTICS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; NARRATION; READING; SEMANTICS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77954162271     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019763     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albrecht J.E., O'Brien E.J. Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:1061-1070.
2. Cook, A. E. (2000). The Moses Illusion in reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire.
3. Cook A.E., Guéraud S. What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 2005, 39:265-278.
4. Cook A.E., Halleran J.G., O'Brien E.J. What is readily available? A memory-based view of text processing. Discourse Processes 1998, 26:109-129.
5. Cook A.E., Myers J.L. Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:268-288.
6. Duffy S.A., Rayner K. Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effects of antecedent typicality and distance. Language and Speech 1990, 33:103-119.
7. Dunlosky J., Rawson K.A., Middleton E.L. What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:551-565.
8. Eakin D.K. Illusions of knowing: Metamemory and memory under conditions of retroactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:526-534.
9. Ehrlich K., Rayner K. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983, 22:75-87.
10. Foltz P.W., Kintsch W., Landauer T.K. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 1998, 25:285-307.
11. Garrod S. Resolving pronouns and other anaphoric devices. Perspectives on sentence processing 1994, 339-359. Erlbaum, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. C. Clifton, L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds.).
12. Garrod S., Sanford A.J. Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. Handbook of psycholinguistics 1994, 675-698. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.).
13. Garrod S., Terras M. The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:526-544.
14. Gerrig R.J., McKoon G. The readiness is all: The functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes 1998, 26:67-86.
15. Gerrig R.J., O'Brien E.J. The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes 2005, 39:225-242.
16. Gillund G., Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 1984, 91:1-67.
17. Graesser A.C., Singer M., Trabasso T. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 1994, 101:371-395.
18. Guéraud, S. (2003). Updating a situational model during narrative text reading: Strategic or automatic process? Contributions and limits of the resonance model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
19. Guéraud S., Harmon M., Peracchi K.D. Updating situation models: The memory-based contribution. Discourse Processes 2005, 39:243-263.
20. Guéraud, S., & Tapiero, I. (2003, July). Mechanisms of reactivation and integration in the Resonance Model: Some new evidences. Paper presented at 13th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Madrid, Spain.
21. Hakala C.M., O'Brien E.J. Strategies for resolving coherence breaks in reading. Discourse Processes 1995, 20:167-185.
22. Johnson H.M., Seifert C.M. Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1420-1436.
23. Johnson H.M., Seifert C.M. Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1483-1494.
24. Johnson H.M., Seifert C.M. Modifying mental representation: Comprehending corrections. The construction of mental representations during reading 1999, 303-318. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. H. Van Oostendorp, S.R. Goldman (Eds.).
25. Kaup B. Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition 2001, 29:960-967.
26. Kaup B., Lüdkte J., Zwaan R.A. Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed?. Journal of Pragmatics 2006, 38:1033-1050.
27. Kaup B., Zwaan R.A. Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:439-446.
28. Kaup B., Zwaan R.A., Lüdkte J. The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negated text information represented?. Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes 2007, 255-288. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. F. Schmalhofer, C.A. Perfetti (Eds.).
29. Kendeou P., van den Broek P. The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:1567-1577.
30. Kintsch W., McNamara D.S., Dennis S., Landauer T.K. LSA and meaning: In theory and application. Handbook of latent semantic analysis 2007, 467-479. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. T.K. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S. Dennis, W. Kintsch (Eds.).
31. Koriat A. How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review 1993, 100:609-639.
32. Koriat A. Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:311-333.
33. Landauer T.K., Foltz P.W., Laham D. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 1998, 25:259-284.
34. Lea R.B., Mulligan E.J., Walton J. Accessing distant premise information: How memory feeds reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 28:303-317.
35. Lea R.B., Rapp D.N., Elfenbein A., Mitchel A.D., Romine R.S. Sweet silent thought: Alliteration and resonance in poetry comprehension. Psychological Science 2008, 19:709-716.
36. Long D.L., Chong J.L. Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders' abilities. Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1424-1429.
37. Magliano J.P., Trabasso T., Graesser A.C. Strategic processes during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91:615-629.
38. Magliano J.P., Zwaan R.A., Graesser A.C. The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. The construction of mental representations during reading 1998, 219-245. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.R. Goldman, H. van Oostendorp (Eds.).
39. McKoon G., Ratcliff R. Memory based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990's. Annual Review of Psychology 1998, 49:25-42.
40. Morrow D.G., Greenspan S.E., Bower G.H. Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:165-187.
41. Myers J.L., O'Brien E.J. Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes 1998, 26:131-157.
42. Myers J.L., O'Brien E.J., Albrecht J.E., Mason R.A. Maintaining global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:876-886.
43. O'Brien E.J., Albrecht J.E. The role of context in accessing antecedents in text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:94-102.
44. O'Brien E.J., Albrecht J.E. Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:777-784.
45. O'Brien E.J., Cook A.E., Peracchi K.A. Updating situation models: Reply to Zwaan and Madden (2004). Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:289-291.
46. O'Brien E.J., Myers J.L. The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition 1987, 15:419-427.
47. O'Brien E.J., Myers J.L. Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso 1999, 35-53. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.R. Goldman, A.C. Graesser, P. van den Broek (Eds.).
48. O'Brien E.J., Rizzella M.L., Albrecht J.E., Halleran J.G. Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1200-1210.
49. Rapp D.N., Kendeou P. Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:2019-2032.
50. Rapp D.N., Kendeou P. Noticing and revising discrepancies as text unfolds. Discourse Processes 2009, 46:1-24.
51. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 1978, 85:59-108.
52. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review 1988, 95:285-408.
53. Rehder B., Schreiner M.E., Wolfe M.B.W., Laham D., Landauer T.K., Kintsch W. Using latent semantic analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations. Discourse Processes 1998, 25:337-354.
54. Richards E., Singer M. Representation of complex goal structures in narrative comprehension. Discourse Processes 2001, 31:111-135.
55. Rizzella M.L., O'Brien E.J. Retrieval of concepts in script-based texts and narratives: The influence of general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:780-790.
56. Singer M., Richards E. Representing complex narrative goal structures: Competing memory-based and situational influences. Discourse Processes 2005, 39:189-204.
57. Sturt P. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference solution. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:542-562.
58. Trabasso T., Suh S. Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working-memory. Discourse Processes 1993, 16:3-34.
59. Trabasso T., van den Broek P. Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language 1985, 24:612-630.
60. Zwaan R.A., Madden C.J. Updating situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:283-288.
61. Zwaan R.A., Magliano J.P., Graesser A.C. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:386-397.
62. Zwaan R.A., Radvansky G.A. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:162-185.