Getting Real: The Duration of Framing Effects

Journal of Communication

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 959-983

  Lecheler, Sophie ^a   De Vreese, Claes H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE; POLITICS;

EID: 80053533849     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barabas, J., & Jerit, J. (2008, June). Survey experiments and the external validity of treatments. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, Vancouver, BC.
2. Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006). Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 640-656.
3. Bizer, G. Y., & Petty, R. E. (2005). How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology, 26, 553-568.
4. Boomgaarden, H. G., & de Vreese, C. H. (2007). Dramatic real-world events and public opinion dynamics: Media coverage and its impact on public reactions to an assassination. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(3), 354-366.
5. Brewer, P. R. (2001). Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values? Political Psychology, 22, 45-64.
6. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
8. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99-118.
9. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2008, August). Dynamic public opinion: Framing effects over time. Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
10. d'Haenens, L. (2005). Euro-vision. The portrayal of the Europe in the quality press. International Communication Gazette, 67(5), 419-440.
11. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1179-1206.
12. de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7(2), 191-214.
13. de Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU: Linking content analysis and experimental data. Communications. The European Journal of Communication, 3(4), 261-281.
14. Druckman, J. N. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041-1066.
15. Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225-256.
16. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671-686.
17. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence, American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729-745.
18. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
19. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
20. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421-435.
22. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2007). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15, 1-20.
23. Gerber, A. S., Karlan, D., & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 35-52.
24. Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun policy, opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: the conditional influence of issue frames. Journal of Politics, 63, 520-543.
25. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
26. Hobolt, S. B. (2007). Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 151-182.
27. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
28. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Iyengar, S. (2009). Framing research: The next steps. In B. F. Schaffner & P. J. Sellers (Eds.), Winning with words: The origins & impact of political framing (pp. 185-191). New York, NY: Routledge.
30. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Jerit, J. (2009). Issue framing and engagement: Rhetorical strategy in public policy debates. Political Behavior, 30, 1-24.
32. Kahneman, D. (2000). Preface. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. ix-xvii). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
34. Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155-162.
35. Kinder, D. R., & Palfrey, T. R. (Eds.). (1993). Experimental foundations of political science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: the case of white opinion on affirmative action for black. Social Cognition, 8, 73-103.
37. Kleinnijenhuis, J., Van Hoof, A. M. J., & Oegema, D. (2006). Negative news and the sleeper effect of distrust. The Harvard Journal International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 86-104.
38. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the gulf war on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975.
39. Lavine, H., Lodge, M., Polichak, J., & Taber, C. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentation: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10(4), 343-361.
40. Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2009, May). News framing and public opinion: A mediational analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
41. Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400-425.
42. Levy, J. S. (2002). Daniel Kahneman. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35, 271-273.
43. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
44. Maier, J., & Rittberger, B. (2008). Shifting Europe's boundaries: Mass media, public opinion and the enlargement of the EU. European Union Politics, 9(2), 243-267.
45. Matthes, J. (2007). Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications, 32, 51-78.
46. Matthes, J. (2009). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media-framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349-367.
47. McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental methodology in political science. Political Analysis, 10(4), 325-342.
48. McLaren, L. M. (2007). Explaining opposition to Turkish membership of the EU. European Union Politics, 8(2), 251-278.
49. Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56, 27-51.
50. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1-15.
51. Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Communication Research, 30, 224-247.
52. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behaviour, 19(3), 221-246.
53. Peter, J. (2004). Our long 'return to the concept of powerful mass media'-a cross-national comparative investigation of the effects of consonant media coverage. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(2), 144-168.
54. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
55. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. Communication Research, 24(5), 481-506.
56. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2), 297-316.
57. Scheufele, B. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications. The European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 401-428.
58. Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5-23.
59. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93-109.
60. Shah, D., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30, 102-120.
61. Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55, 795-809.
62. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1-28.
63. Sniderman, P. M., & Grob, D. (1996). Innovations in experimental design in general population attitude surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377-399.
64. Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804-829.
66. Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
67. Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. (1994). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225-240.
68. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Biek, M. (1995). Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 283-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.