Building a local conceptual framework for epistemic actions in a modelling environment with experiments

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 225-234

  Halverscheid, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867366183     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-008-0088-x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Artigue, M. (1990). Obstacles as objects of comparative studies in mathematics and in physics. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 22(6), 200-204.
2. Blum, W. (1996). Anwendungsbezüge im Mathematikunterricht-Trends und Perspektiven. In G. Kadunz, H. Kautschitsch, G. Ossimitz & E. Schneider (Eds.), Trends und Perspektiven. Schriftenreihe Didaktik der Mathematik, Vol. 23 (pp. 15-38). Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
3. Blum, W. et al. (2003). ICME study 14 Applications and modelling in mathematics education-discussion document. Educational studies in mathematics, 51, 149-171.
4. Blum, W., Galbraith, P., Henn, H. W., & Niss, M. (Eds.) (2006). Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education. New York: Springer.
5. Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects-state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational studies in mathematics, 22(1), 37-68.
6. Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2006). Individual modelling routes of pupils-analysis of modelling problems in mathematics lessons from a cognitive perspective. In C. Haines, et al. (Eds.), ICTMA-12: model transitions in the real world. Chichester: Horwood.
7. De Lange, J. (1989). Trends and barriers to applications and modelling in mathematics curricula. In W. Blum, M. Niss, & I. Huntley (Eds.), Modelling, applications and applied problem solving. (pp. 196-204). Chichester: Ellis Horwoord.
8. Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2001). Abstraction in context: the case of peer interaction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(3), 307-368.
9. Dreyfus, T., & Kidron, I. (2006) Interacting parallel constructions: a solitary learner and the bifurcation diagram. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques. 26(3), 295-336.
10. Eisenhart, M. A. (1991). Conceptual frameworks for research circa 1991: Ideas from a cultural anthropologist; implications for mathematics education researchers. Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 202-219). Blacksburg, VA.
11. Hersh, R. (1991). Mathematics has a front and a back. Synthese, 88, Vol. 2.
12. Kaiser, G. (2006). Modelling and modelling competencies in school. In C. P. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 110-119). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
13. Kaiser, G., & Mass, K. (2006). Modelling in lower secondary mathematics classrooms: problems, opportunities. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, M. Niss (Eds.), Applications and modelling in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 99-108). New York: Springer.
14. Kleiner, I. (1991). Rigor and proof in mathematics: a historical perspective. Mathematics Magazine, 64, 291-314.
15. Maaß, K. (2004). Mathematisches Modellieren im Unterricht. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
16. Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competences? Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 38(2), 113-142.
17. Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2004). Abstraction in mathematics and mathematics learning. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 329-336). Bergen, Norway: Program Committee.
18. Pollak, H. O. (1969). How can we teach applications of mathematics? Educational studies in mathematics, 2, 393-404.
19. Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365-395.
20. Steiner, H. G. (1990). Needed cooperation between science education and mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 22(6), 194-197.
21. Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2006). Constructing and consolidating of algebraic knowledge within dyadic processes: a case study. Educational studies in mathematics, 63, 235-258.