Diversity of theories in mathematics education - How can we deal with it?

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 52-57

  Bikner Ahsbahs, Angelika ^a   Prediger, Susanne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53849136004     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02655905     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arnold, M., & Fischer, R. (2004) (eds.). Disziplinierungen. Kulturen der Wissenschaft im Vergleich [Disciplines. Sciences as cultures in comparison]. Wien: Turia & Kant.
2. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2005). Mathematikinteresse zwischen Subjekt und Situation [Interest in Mathematics between Subject and Situation]. Hildesheim: Verlag Franzbecker.
3. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2006, in prep.). Crossing the Border - Integrating Different Paradigms and Perspectives. - To appear in M. Bosch (ed.). Proceedings of CERME 4. February 2005. Sant Feliu, Spain.
4. Bishop, A. J. (1992). International Perspectives on Research in Mathematics Education. In D. A. Grouws (ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. (710-723). New York, Oxford: Macmillon Publishing Company.
5. Dilthey, W. (1883). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, [Introduction to the human sciences] Original 1883, 9th edition, (1990). Stuttgart: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
6. Dreyfus, T; Artigue, M; Bartolini B; Gray, E & Prediger, S (2006, in prep.). Different theoretical perspectives and approaches in research in mathematics education, Report from working group 11. To appear in M. Bosch (ed.). Proceedings of CERME 4, February 2005, Sant Feliu, Spain.
7. Sriraman, B & English, L. (2005). Theories of Mathematics Education: A global survey of theoretical frameworks / trends in mathematics education research. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 37 (6), 450-456.
8. Ernest, P; Prediger, S & Viggiani-Bicudo, M (in press for 2006): Philosophy of Mathematics Education - Strands and Issues. To appear in: M. Blomhoj & E. Emborg (eds.). Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education 2004, Kopenhagen.
9. Even, R. & Schwarz, B. (2003). Implications of competing interpretations of practice for research and theory in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics Education 54, 283-313.
10. Fischer, R. (1993). Wissenschaft, Argumentation und Widerspruch [Science, argumentation and contradiction]. In R. Fischer et al. (eds.). Argumentation und Entscheidung. Zur Idee und Organisation von Wissenschaft. Wien-München: Profil, 29-43.
11. Groeben, N. et al. (1988). Das Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien. Eine Einführung in die Psychologie des reflexiven Subjekts [The research program subjective theories. An introduction to the psychology of the reflexive subject]. Tübingen: Francke.
12. Harel, G., & Lim, K. H. (2004). Mathematics Teacher's Knowledge Base: Prelimery results. In Johnsen Hoeines, Marit & Fuglstad, Anne Berit (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Conference on the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematik Education. (25-32). Bergen: University College.
13. Heymann, H. W. (2003). Why Teach Mathematics: A Focus on General Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Hoffmann, M. H. G. & Roth, W-M. (2004). Learning by Developing Knowledge Networks. Zentralblatt der Didaktik der Mathematik 36 (6), 196-205.
15. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The Ethnography of Argumentation. In Cobb, Paul & Bauersfeld, Heinrich (eds.). The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures. (229-269). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Krummheuer, G. (2001). Paraphrase und Tradktion. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
17. Lamnek, S. (1995). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Bd. 1, Methodologie [Qualitative social research, vol. 1, methodology]. Weinheim: Beltz.
18. Mason, J. & Waywood, A. (1996). The role of theory in mathematics education and research. In A. J. Bishop et al. (eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education. (1055-1089), Kluwer: Dordrecht.
19. Prediger, S. (2004). Intercultural Perspectives on Mathematics Learning - Developing a Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2 (2004) 3, 377-406.
20. Reid, D. (1996). Enactivism as a Methodology. In L. Puig & A Gutiérrez,(eds.). Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4 (203-210). Valencia, Spain.
21. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In: L.D. English (ed.). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. (435-487). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Steen, L. A.(1999). Review of Mathematics Education as research domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(2), 235-241.
23. Steinbring, H. (2004). The construction of New mathematical knowledge in Classroom Interaction. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. Ulich, D. (1976). Pädagogische Interaktion. Theorien erzieherischen Handelns und sozialen Lernens [Pedagogical Interactions. Theories of educational action and social learning]. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.