Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing?

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3405-3415

  Janczyk, Markus ^a   Franz, Volker H ^b   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action; Dorsal; Dual task; Grasping; PRP; Ventral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HANDEDNESS; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957299378     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.034     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F.X., Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 1995, 5:679-685.
2. Derakhshan I. Laterality of the command center in relation to handedness and simple reaction time: A clinical perspective. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:3556.
3. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Science 2001, 5:457-459.
4. Franz V.H. Manual size estimation: A neuropsychological measure of perception?. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 151:471-477.
5. Franz V.H., Bülthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: Obstacle-avoidance is not the explanation. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 149:470-477.
6. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:920-950.
7. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bülthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 2000, 11:20-25.
8. Franz V.H., Hesse C., Kollath S. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1518-1531.
9. Ganel T., Goodale M.A. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 2003, 426:664-667.
10. Garner W.R. Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1978, 107:287-308.
11. Garner W.R., Felfoldy G.L. Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology 1970, 1:225-241.
12. Gonzalez C.L.R., Ganel T., Goodale M.A. Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 95:3496-3501.
13. Gonzalez C.L.R., Goodale M.A., Ganel T. Laterality of the command center in relation to handedness and simple reaction time: A clinical perspective-reply. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:3557.
14. Gonzalez C.L.R., Ganel T., Whitwell R.L., Morrissey B.F., Goodale M.A. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:624-631.
15. Goodale M.A. Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:891-919.
16. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1159-1178.
17. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 1992, 15:20-25.
18. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A., Milner A.D. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research 2004, 144:131-144.
19. Haffenden A.M., Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:122-136.
20. Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 2001, 11:177-181.
21. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1368-1384.
22. Hu Y., Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:856-868.
23. Janczyk M., Kunde W. Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 203:89-100.
24. Kunde W., Landgraf F., Paelecke M., Kiesel A. Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions. Psychological Science 2007, 18:100-104.
25. Kunde W., Müsseler J., Heuer H. Spatial compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors 2007, 49:661-670.
26. Lien M.-C., McCann R., Ruthruff E., Proctor R. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: Is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:122-144.
27. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:212-238.
28. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
29. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244.
30. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
31. Pavani F., Boscagli I., Benvenuti F., Rabuffetti M., Farnè A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 127:95-101.
32. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, & R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Welford A.T. The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speed performance-a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.