Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 203, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 89-100

  Janczyk, Markus ^a   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action; Attention; Dorsal; Dual task; Motor control; PRP; Ventral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952293151     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2211-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. S Aglioti JFX DeSouza MA Goodale 1995 Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand Curr Biol 5 679 685 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00133-3 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXmtlOnur8%3D 7552179
2. VH Franz KR Gegenfurtner 2008 Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation Cogn Neuropsychol 25 920 950 10.1080/02643290701862449
3. T Ganel MA Goodale 2003 Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape Nature 426 664 667 10.1038/nature02156 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1Cksrs%3D 14668865 (Pubitemid 38009374)
4. Garner WR (1974) The processing of information and structure. Erlbaum, Potomac
5. WR Garner 1978 Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli J Exp Psychol Gen 107 287 308 10.1037/0096-3445.107.3.287 1:STN:280: DyaE1M%2Fgs1Khtg%3D%3D 690574
6. MA Goodale 2008 Action without perception in human vision Cogn Neuropsychol 25 891 919 10.1080/02643290801961984 18608333
7. MA Goodale AD Milner 1992 Separate pathways for perception and action Trends Neurosci 15 20 25 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 1:STN:280: DyaK383mtlGhtA%3D%3D 1374953
8. MA Goodale AD Milner 2004 Plans for action Behav Brain Sci 27 37 40 10.1017/S0140525X04340021
9. E Hazeltine E Ruthruff RW Remington 2006 The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference Cogn Psychol 52 291 345 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001 16581054 (Pubitemid 43664898)
10. H Heuer 1995 Models for response-response compatibility: the effects of the relation between responses in a choice task Acta Psychol 90 315 332 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00023-N
11. TW James J Culham GK Humphrey AD Milner MA Goodale 2003 Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: a fMRI study Brain 126 2463 2475 10.1093/brain/awg248 14506065 (Pubitemid 37314436)
12. M Jeannerod P Jacob 2005 Visual cognition: a new look at the two-visual systems model Neuropsychologia 43 301 312 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.016 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FnvFyrtg%3D%3D 15707914 (Pubitemid 40222149)
13. W Kunde F Landgraf M Paelecke A Kiesel 2007 Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions Psychol Sci 18 100 104 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007. 01855.x 17425526
14. T-Y Lee S Hsieh 2009 The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 16 311 329 10.1080/13825580902741351
15. M-C Lien E Ruthruff JC Johnston 2006 Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at once. The search for exceptions Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15 89 93 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00413.x (Pubitemid 43748099)
16. G Liu R Chua JT Enns 2008 Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control Exp Brain Res 185 709 717 10.1007/s00221-007-1196-5 18008067
17. J Miller R Ulrich 2008 Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms Q J Exp Psychol 61 999 1019
18. J Miller R Ulrich B Rolke 2009 On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asychronies Cogn Psychol 58 273 310 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003 19281972
19. Milner AD, Goodale MA (2006) The visual brain in action, 2nd edn. University Press, Oxford
20. D Navon 1984 Resources-a theoretical soup stone? Psychol Rev 91 216 234 10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.216
21. J Norman 2002 Two visual systems and two theories of perception: an attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches Behav Brain Sci 25 73 144 12625088
22. H Pashler 1990 Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16 826 842 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.826 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7gtV2nsw%3D%3D 2148595
23. H Pashler 1994 Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory Psychol Bull 116 220 244 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 1:STN:280: DyaK2M%2Fmt1yitg%3D%3D 7972591
24. Pashler H, Johnston JC (1998) Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In: Pashler H (ed) Attention. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 155-189
25. H Pashler M Carrier J Hoffman 1993 Saccadic eye movements and dual-task interference Q J Exp Psychol 46 51 82 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7ovFygtg%3D%3D
26. MT Perenin A Vighetto 1988 Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects Brain 111 643 674 10.1093/brain/111.3.643 3382915
27. L Pisella F Binkofski K Lasek I Toni Y Rossetti 2006 No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: multiple sub-stream for multiple visuo-manual integrations Neuropsychologia 44 2734 2748 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.027 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nmsV2ntQ%3D%3D 16753188 (Pubitemid 44540203)
28. M Posner 1964 Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks Psychol Rev 71 491 504 10.1037/h0041120 1:STN:280:DyaF2M%2FitFaruw%3D%3D 14216895
29. E Ruthruff J Miller T Lachmann 1995 Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21 552 570 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3. 552 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzhtVyktA%3D%3D 7790833
30. E Ruthruff JC Johnston M van Selst 2001 Why practice reduces dual-task interference J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27 3 21 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzptlKmtA%3D%3D 11248938
31. Shaffer LH (1975) Multiple attention in continuous verbal tasks. In: Rabbitt PMA, Dornic S (eds) Attention and performance V. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 157-167
32. A Singhal JC Culham E Chinellato MA Goodale 2007 Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping J Vision 7 1 12
33. M Tombu P Jolicoeur 2003 A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29 3 18 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3 12669744
34. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 549-586
35. AT Welford 1952 The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speed performance-a review and a theory Br J Psychol 43 2 19
36. Wickens CD (1980) The structure of attentional resources. In: Nickerson R (ed) Attention and performance, vol 8. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 239-257
37. Wickens CD (1984) Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman R, Davies DR (eds) Varieties of attention. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 63-102