Action-Effect Codes in and Before the Central Bottleneck: Evidence From the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 627-644

  Paelecke, Marko ^a   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

action control; anticipated action effects; psychological refractory period

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME;

BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 34547458567     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.627     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Beckers T., de Houwer J., and Eelen P. Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research 66 (2002) 166-173
2. Cohen J., MacWhinney B.M., Flatt M., and Provost J. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25 (1993) 257-271
3. De Jong R., Liang C.C., and Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 731-750
4. Drost U.C., Rieger M., Brass M., Gunter T.C., and Prinz W. Action-effect coupling in pianists. Psychological Research 69 (2005) 233-241
5. Eimer M., Hommel B., and Prinz W. S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica 90 (1995) 301-313
6. Elsner B., and Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 229-240
7. Elsner B., Hommel B., Mentschel B., Drzezga A., Prinz W., Conrad B., et al. Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 364-372
8. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review 77 (1970) 73-97
9. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: Timesharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (1972) 52-57
10. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 859-868
11. Greenwald A.G., and Shulman H.G. On doing two things at once: II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1973) 70-76
12. Hazeltine E. Response-response compatibility during bimanual movements: Evidence for the conceptual coding of action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 682-688
13. Hazeltine E., Diedrichsen J., Kennerley S.W., and Ivry R.B. Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters. Psychological Research 67 (2003) 56-70
14. Hoffmann J. Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung [Anticipation and cognition: The function of anticipations in human behavioral control and perception] (1993), Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany
15. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research 55 (1993) 270-279
16. Hommel B. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 764-775
17. Hommel B. The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research 59 (1996) 176-186
18. Hommel B. Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In: Hommel B., and Prinz W. (Eds). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (1997), North-Holland, Amsterdam 281-320
19. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1368-1384
20. Hommel B. Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research 68 (2004) 74-90
21. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 849-937
22. James W. The principles of psychology (Vols. 1-2) (1890), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Keele S.W. Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin 70 (1968) 387-403
24. Klapp S.T., Porter-Graham K.A., and Hoifjeld A.R. The relation of perception and motor action: Ideomotor compatibility and interference in divided attention. Journal of Motor Behavior 23 (1991) 155-162
25. Koch I., and Kunde W. Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition 30 (2002) 1297-1303
26. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
27. Kornblum S., Stevens G.T., Whipple A., and Requin J. The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 688-714
28. Kunde W. Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 387-394
29. Kunde W. Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research 67 (2003) 153-159
30. Kunde W., Hoffmann J., and Zellmann P. The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica 109 (2002) 137-155
31. Kunde W., Koch I., and Hoffmann J. Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A (2004) 87-106
32. Kunde W., and Weigelt M. Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 145-156
33. Lien M.C., McCann R.S., Ruthruff E., and Proctor R.W. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: Is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 122-144
34. Lien M.-C., and Proctor R.W. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1260-1280
35. Lien M.-C., and Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 212-238
36. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W., and Allen P.A. Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 396-409
37. Logan G.D., and Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 393-434
38. Lotze H. Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or physiology of the soul] (1852), E. J. Bonset, Amsterdam
39. Lu C.H., and Proctor R.W. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 286-298
40. Massaro D.W. An information-processing analysis of perception and action. In: Neumann O., and Prinz W. (Eds). Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (1990), Springer, Berlin, Germany 133-166
41. McCann R.S., and Johnston J.C. Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 471-484
42. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 3-65
43. Miller J., and Reynolds A. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 1126-1142
44. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (in press). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology
45. Navon D., and Miller J. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 44 (2002) 193-251
46. Pashler H. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 358-377
47. Pashler H. Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology 21 (1989) 469-514
48. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 220-244
49. Pashler H., and Johnston J.C. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41A (1989) 19-45
50. Prinz W. Ideo-motor action. In: Heuer H., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Perspectives on perception and action (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 47-76
51. Ridderinkhof K.R. Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (2002), Oxford University Press, New York 494-519
52. Sanders A.F. Stage analysis of reaction processes. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in motor behavior (1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam 331-354
53. Sanders A.F. Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
54. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82 (1975) 225-260
55. Schweickert R. A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 18 (1978) 105-139
56. Smith E.E. Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin 69 (1968) 77-110
57. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica 30 (1969) 276-315
58. Thompson G.L. An SPSS implementation of the non-recursive outlier deletion procedure with shifting z-score criterion (Van Selst & Jolicœur, 1994). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 38 (2006) 344-352
59. Tombu M., and Jolicœur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 3-18
60. van Selst M., and Jolicœur P. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47A (1994) 631-650
61. Welford A.T. The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 43 (1952) 2-19
62. Ziessler M., and Nattkemper D. Effect anticipation in action planning. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (2002), Oxford University Press, New York 646-672
63. Ziessler M., Nattkemper D., and Frensch P.A. The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research 68 (2004) 163-175