Project-based learning with an online peer assessment system in a photonics instruction for enhancing led design skills

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 236-246

  Chang, Shu Hsuan ^a   Wu, Tsung Chih ^a   Kuo, Yen Kuang ^a   You, Li Chih ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cooperative collaborative learning; Improving classroom teaching; Interdisciplinary projects

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867179759     PISSN: 13036521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bilalic, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 108(3), 652-661.
2. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2011). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 57(6), 303-320.
3. Chang, S. H., Chen, M. L., Kuo, Y. K., & Shen, Y. C. (2011). A simulation-based LED device design project in photonics instruction based on industry-university collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 582-589.
4. Chang, S. H. (2006). Enhancing the skills of Photonics device design through the project-Based course development and evaluation. (NSC Publication No. 95-2516-S-018-001-MY3). Taipei: National Science Council.
5. Choi, R. J., Hahn, Y. B., Shim, H. W., Han, M. S., Suh, E. K., & Lee, H. J. (2003). Efficient blue light-emitting diodes with InGaN/GaN triangular shaped multiple quantum wells. Applied Physics Letters, 82(17), 2764-2766.
6. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education Teaching International, 37(4), 346-354.
7. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
8. Freeman, M., & McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 551-569.
9. nd Ed). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
10. Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem finding and the inventiveness of solutions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 12-18.
11. Huang, J. (2009). Taiwan's solar-optoelectronics and LED industries forecast to hit NT$1 trillion production value by 2015. LEDinside. Retrieved from http://www.ledinside.com.tw/news_2015_ LED_20091105.
12. Honebein, P. C. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp. 11-24). NJ, Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publication Inc.
13. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
14. Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1122-1125.
15. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: An effective weblearning strategy with the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246-251.
16. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological monographs, 54(6), 248-295.
17. Lunette, V., & Hofstein, A. (1991). Simulation and laboratory practical activity. In B. Woodnough, (Ed.), Practical Science. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open Univ. Press.
18. Macías-Guarasa, J., Montero, J. M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., & Nieto-Taladriz, O. (2006). A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 389-397.
19. Maskell, D. L., & Grabau, P. J. (1998). A multidisciplinary cooperative problem-based learning approach to embedded systems design. IEEE Transactions on Education, 41(2), 101-103.
20. Oder, T. N., Kim, K. H., Lin, J. Y., & Jiang, H. X. (2004). III-nitride blue and ultraviolet photonic crystal light emitting diodes. Applied Physics Letters, 84(4), 466-469.
21. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250.
22. Rieber, L. P., & Parmley, M. W. (1995). To teach or not to teach? Comparing the use of computer-based simulations in deductive versus inductive approaches to learning with adults in science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 359-374.
23. Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 5), 829-845.
24. Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 343-353.
25. Stern, F., Tao, X., Yarbrough, D. B., Rothmayer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S. P., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutchings, B., & Moeykens, S. (2006). Hands-on CFD educational interface for engineering courses and laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 63-83.
26. Sullivan, M. E, Hitchcock, M. A., & Dunnington, G. L. (1999). Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials. The American Journal of Surgery, 177, 266-269.
27. Sweller, J., Van-Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and Instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-297.
28. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
29. Tsai, C. C. (1998). Science learning and constructivism. Curriculum and Teaching, 13, 31-52.
30. Tsai, C. C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42(2), 193-205.
31. Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). A network peer assessment system based on a vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Training International, 38(3), 220-230.
32. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
33. Wen, M. L. & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University student's perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
34. Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83-92.
35. Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp. 3-8). NJ, Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publication Inc.
36. Yaeger, K. A. R., Halamek, L. P. M., Coyle, M. M., Murphy, A. M. D., Anderson, J. M., Boyle, K. N., Braccta, K. R., Mcauley, J. N., Sandre, G. M., & Smith, B. R. (2004). High-fidelify simulation-based training in neonatal nursing. Advances in Neonatal Care, 4(6), 326-331