Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue OCT, 2011, Pages

  Hofmann, Markus J ^a   Kuchinke, Lars ^a,b   Biemann, Chris ^c   Tamm, Sascha ^a   Jacobs, Arthur M ^a,d  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion   (Germany)

Author keywords

Associative spreading activation; Co occurrence statistics; Contextual; Interactive activation model; Multiple read out model; Semantic; Unequal variance signal detection model; Veridical and false memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867066085     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adelman, J. S., and Brown, G. D. A. (2008). Modelling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects. Psychol. Rev. 115, 214-229.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22, 261-295.
3. Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., and Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychol. Rev. 116, 463-498.
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Berry, D., Shanks, D. R., and Henson, R. N. A. (2008). A unitary signal-detection model of implicit and explicit memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 367-373.
6. Bogacz, R., Usher, M., Zhang, J., and McClelland, J. L. (2007). Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity, and value-based multidimensional choice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362, 1655-1670.
7. Bowman, A. W., and Azzalini, A. (1997). Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Braun, M., Jacobs, A. M., Hahne, A., Ricker, B., Hofmann, M., and Hutzler, F. (2006). Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP.
9. amplitudes in lexical decision. Brain Res. 1073-1074, 431-439.
10. Bullinaria, J. A., and Levy, J. P. (2007). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: a computational study. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 510-526.
11. Collins, A., and Quillian, M. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 8, 240-247.
12. Collins, A. M., and Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 82, 407-428.
13. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., and Besner, D. (1977). "Access to the internal lexicon," in Attention and Performance, ed. S. Dornic (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 535-555.
14. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., and Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 108, 204-256.
15. Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., and Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 861-893.
16. Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M., and Hacker, S. (2010). Recognition memory for 2, 578 monosyllabic words. Memory 18, 595-609.
17. Danker, J. F., Gunn, P., and Anderson, J. R. (2008). A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2674-2684.
18. DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 109, 710-721.
19. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 17-22.
20. Devlin, J., Jamison, H., Matthews, P., and Gonnerman, L. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 14984.
21. Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Comput. Linguist. 19, 61-74.
22. Firth, J. R. (1957). "A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955," in Studies in Linguistic Analysis, edited by Philological Society (Oxford: Blackwell), 1-32.
23. Gillund, G., and Shiffrin, R. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychol. Rev. 91, 1-67.
24. Glanzer, M., Adams, J., Iverson, G., and Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 100, 546-567.
25. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., and Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 500-513.
26. Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple readout model. Psychol. Rev. 103, 518-565.
27. Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (1998). "On localist connectionism and psychological science," in Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition, eds J. Grainger and A. M. Jacobs (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.), 1-38.
28. Grainger, J., and Ziegler, J. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Front. Psychol. 2:54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
29. Griffiths, T., Steyvers, M., and Tenenbaum, J. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychol. Rev. 114, 211-244.
30. Grossberg, S. (1978). "A theory of visual coding, memory, and development," in Formal Theories of Visual Perception, eds E. Laurens, H. F. Leeuwenberg and J. M. Buffart (New York: Wiley), 7-26.
31. Grossberg, S. (1987). Competitive learning: from interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cogn. Sci. 11, 23-63.
32. Harm, M., and Seidenberg, M. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychol. Rev. 111, 662-720.
33. Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.
34. Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., Tamm, S., Võ, M. L. H., and Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Affective processing within.
35. 1/10th of a second: high arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 389-397.
36. Hofmann, M. J., Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., and Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 620-629.
37. Hofmann, M. J., Tamm, S., Braun, M. M., Dambacher, M., Hahne, A., and Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Conflict monitoring engages the mediofrontal cortex during nonword processing. Neuroreport 19, 25-29.
38. Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R., and Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: evidence for a simple signaldetection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 481-488.
39. Jacobs, A. M., and Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition sampling the state of the art. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 1311-1334.
40. Jones, M. N., and Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychol. Rev. 114, 1-37.
41. Kimball, D. R., Smith, T. A., and Kahana, M. J. (2007). The fSAM Model of False Recall. Psychol. Rev. 114, 954-993.
42. Klonek, F., Tamm, S., Hofmann, M., and Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Does familiarity or conflict account for performance in the word-stem completion task? Evidence from behavioural and event-related-potential data. Psychol. Res. 73, 871-882.
43. Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Võ, M. L.H., Conrad, M., Grubich, C., and Herrmann, M. (2006). Modulation of prefrontal activation by emotional words in recognition memory. Neuroreport 17, 1037-1041.
44. Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104, 211-240.
45. Malmberg, K. (2008). Recognition memory: a review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cogn. Psychol. 57, 335-384.
46. Masson, M. E. J. (1991). "A distributed memory model of context effects in word identfication," in Basic Processes in Reading, eds D. Besner, and G. W. Humphreys (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 233-263.
47. Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 3-23.
48. McClelland, J. L. (1993). "Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks," in Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience, edsD.E. MeyerandS. Kornblum (Cambridge: MIT Press), 655-688.
49. McClelland, J. L., and Chappell, M. (1998). Familarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 105, 724-760.
50. McClelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychol. Rev. 88, 375-407.
51. Morton, J. (1964). A preliminary functional model for language behavior. Int. Audiol. 3, 216-225.
52. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychol. Rev. 76, 165-178.
53. Murdock, B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). Psychol. Rev. 104, 839-862.
54. Nelson, D., McKinney, V., Gee, N., and Janczura, G. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. Psychol. Rev. 105, 299-324.
55. Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychol. Rev. 75, 522-536.
56. O'Reilly, R. (1998). Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 455-462.
57. Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: a localist manifesto. Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 443-512.
58. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., and Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 114, 273-315.
59. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., and Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol. Rev. 103, 56-115.
60. Quasthoff, U., Richter, M., and Biemann, C. (2006). "Corpus portal for search in monolingual corpora," Proceedings of LREC-06, Genoa.
61. Quillian, R. (1967). Word concepts: a theory and simualation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behav. Sci. 12, 410-430.
62. Rapp, R.,and Wettler, M. (1991). Prediction of FreeWordAssociations Based on Hebbian Learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Singapore.
63. Ratcliff, R., and McKoon, G. (1994). Retrieving information from memory: spreading-activation theories versus compound-cue theories. Psychol. Rev. 99, 518-535.
64. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., and Gronlund, S.-D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol. Rev. 99, 518-535.
65. Rey, A., Dufau, S., Massol, S., and Grainger, J. (2009). Testing computational models of letter perception with item-level ERPs. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 26, 7-22.
66. Roediger, H., and McDermott, K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 803-814.
67. Roediger, H. L., Balota, D. A., and Watson, J. M. (2001). "Spreading activaiton and arousal of false memory," in The Nature of Remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder, Science Conference Series, eds H. L. Roediger, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, and A. M. Surprenant (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 95-115.
68. Rogers, T., and McClelland, J. (2008). Precise of semantic cognition: a parallel distributed processing approach. Behav. Brain Sci. 31, 689-714.
69. Rumelhart, D., and Todd, P. (1993). "Learning and connectionist representations," in Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience, edsD.E. MeyerandS. Kornblum (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 3-30.
70. Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation modelofcontexteffectsinletterperception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychol. Rev. 89, 60-94.
71. Seidenberg, M., and McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96, 523-568.
72. Shiffrin, R., and Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychol. Bull. Rev. 4, 145-166.
73. Spieler, D. H., and Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychol. Sci. 8, 411-416.
74. Squire, L., Wixted, J., and Clark, R. (2007). Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 872-883.
75. Steyvers, M., Griffiths, T., and Dennis, S. (2006). Probabilistic inference in human semantic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 327-334.
76. Thompson-Schill, S. L., and Botvinick, M. M. (2006). Resolving conflict: a response to Martin and Cheng (2006). Psychol. Bull. Rev. 13, 402-408.
77. Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., and Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin affective word list reloaded (BAWLR). Behav. Res. Methods 41, 534-538.
78. Wixted, J. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 114, 152-176.
79. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiveroperating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dualprocess model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 1341-1354.
80. Yonelinas, A. P., Otten, L. J., Shaw, K. N., and Rugg, M. D. (2005). Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 25, 3002-3008.
81. Ziegler, J., and Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol. Bull. Rev. 131, 3-29.