Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 828-835

  Cook, Gabriel I ^a   Marsh, Richard L ^b   Hicks, Jason L ^c  

^a CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context memory; Metacognition; Source monitoring

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECALL; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE;

CUES; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; SEMANTICS; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 33746644857     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.828     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Anisfeld, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionalily in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171-179.
2. Bower, G. H. (1967). A multi-component theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 229-325). New York: Academic Press.
3. Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416.
4. D'Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Influence of affective meaning on memory for contextual information. Emotion, 4, 173-188.
5. Dodson, C. S., Holland, P. W., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1121-1136.
6. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374-380.
7. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-278.
8. Guttentag, R., & Carroll, D. (1997). Recollection-based recognition: Word frequency effects. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 502-516.
9. Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 685-691.
10. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2002). On predicting the future states of awareness for recognition of unrecallable items. Memory & Cognition, 30, 60-66.
11. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Ritschel, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 503-508.
12. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
13. Jacoby, L. L., Jones, T. C., & Dolan, P. O. (1998). Two effects of repetition: Support for a dual-process model of know judgments and exclusion errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 705-709.
14. Jameson, K. A., Narens, L., Goldfarb, K., & Nelson, T. O. (1990). The influence of near-threshold priming on metamemory and recall. Acta Psychologica, 73, 55-68.
15. Jensen, K., & Wirth, N. (1991). Pascal user manual and report: ISO Pascal standard (4th ed.) [Computer programming language manual]. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
17. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
18. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
19. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociation knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 124, 311-333.
20. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27, 34-53.
21. Koriat, A., Levy-Sadot, R., Edry, E. & de Marcas, S. (2003). What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1095-1105.
22. Maki, R. H. (1999). The roles of competition, target accessibility, and cue familiarity in metamemory for word pairs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1011-1023.
23. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2003). The role of "incidental" attributes in recovering source-monitoring information. Unpublished manuscript.
24. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
25. Qin, J., Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., & Mitchell, K. J. (2001). Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1110-1115.
26. Quamme, J. R., Frederick, C., Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Dobbins, I. G. (2002). Recognition memory for source and occurrence: The importance of recollection. Memory & Cognition, 30, 893-907.
27. Schacter, D. L., & Worling, J. R. (1985). Attribute information and the feeling-of-knowing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 467-475.
28. Schreiber, T. A. (1998). Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 26, 553-571.
29. Slotnick, S. D., & Dodson, C. S. (2005). Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory & Cognition, 33, 151-170.
30. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
31. Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.
32. Yonelinas, A. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.
33. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.