The Effect of Text Coherence and Modality on Metamemory Judgements

Memory

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 309-322

  Carroll, Marie ^a   Korukina, Svetlana ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; WRITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; WRITING;

EID: 0033122153     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096582199387940     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bransford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
2. Carroll, M., & Nelson, T.O. (1993). Effects of overlearning on the feeling of knowing are more detectable in within-subject than between-subject designs. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 227-235.
3. Carroll, M., Nelson, T.O., & Kirwan, A. (1997). Trade-off of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 95, 239-253.
4. Gallini, J.K., Spires, H.A., Hiller, G., Terry, S., & Gleaton, J. (1993). The influence of macro and micro-level cognitive strategies training on text learning. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 26, 164-178.
5. Gathercole, S.E., & Conway, M.A. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341-361.
6. Gathercole, S.E., & Conway, M.A. (1988). Exploring long-term modality effects: Vocalisation leads to best retention. Memory and Cognition, 16, 110-119.
7. Hart, J.T. (1965). Memory and the feeling of knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208-216.
8. Hayman, C.A.G., & Rickards, C. (1995). A dissociation in the effects of study modality on tests of implicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 23, 95-112.
9. Hintzman, D.L., Block, R.A., & Inskeep, N.R. (1972). Memory for mode of input. Journal of Verbal Behavior, 11 741-749.
10. Jakimik, J., & Glenberg, A. (1990). Verbal learning meets psycholinguistics: Modality in the comprehension of anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 582-590.
11. Kelley, C.M., Jacoby, L.L., & Hollingshead, A. (1989). Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: Judgments of modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 15, 1101-1108.
12. Kirsner, K. (1974). Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 579-584.
13. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilisation approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
14. Lehman, E. (1982). Memory for modality: Evidence for an automatic process. Memory and Cognition, 10, 554-564.
15. Mannes, S. (1994). Strategic processing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 577-588.
16. Mazzoni, G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47-60.
17. Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T.O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1263-1274.
18. McDaniel, M.A., Einstein, G.O., Dunay, P.K., & Cobb, R.E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 645-656.
19. Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
20. Muramoto, T. (1996). Text recall and text recognition with and without a title. Japanese Psychological Research, 38, 240-244.
21. Nelson, T.O., & Narens, L. (1992). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In T.O. Nelson (Ed.), Metacognition: Core readings. Sydney: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Roediger, H.L., & Challis, B.H. (1992). Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 18, 3-14.
23. Roediger, H.L., Srinivas, K., & Weldon, M.S. (1989). Dissociations between implicit measures of retention. In S. Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 67-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Shaddock, A., & Carroll, M. (1997). Influences on metamemory judgments. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49, 21-27.
25. Thorndyke, P.W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory for narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
26. Tulving, E. (1979). Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 405-428). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
28. Weaver, C.A., & Bryant, D.S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 12-22.