A portrait of the GET pathway as a surprisingly complicated young man

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 411-417

  Denic, Vladimir ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; GUIDED ENTRY OF TAIL ANCHORED PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOGENESIS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSPORT KINETICS;

ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84866595263     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Rapoport T.A. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nature 2007, 450:663-669.
2. Kutay U., et al. Transport route for synaptobrevin via a novel pathway of insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. EMBO J. 1995, 14:217-223.
3. Stefanovic S., Hegde R.S. Identification of a targeting factor for posttranslational membrane protein insertion into the ER. Cell 2007, 128:1147-1159.
4. Favaloro V., et al. Distinct targeting pathways for the membrane insertion of tail-anchored (TA) proteins. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:1832-1840.
5. Shao S., Hegde R.S. Membrane protein insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27:25-56.
6. Hegde R.S., Keenan R.J. Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:787-798.
7. Wang F., et al. A chaperone cascade sorts proteins for posttranslational membrane insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:159-171.
8. Battle A., et al. Automated identification of pathways from quantitative genetic interaction data. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:379.
9. Costanzo M., et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327:425-431.
10. Kohl C., et al. Cooperative and independent activities of Sgt2 and Get5 in the targeting of tail-anchored proteins. Biol. Chem. 2011, 392:601-608.
11. Chartron J.W., et al. Structural characterization of the Get4/Get5 complex and its interaction with Get3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:12127-12132.
12. Wang F., et al. The mechanism of tail-anchored protein insertion into the ER membrane. Mol. Cell 2011, 43:738-750.
13. Chang Y.W., et al. Crystal structure of Get4-Get5 complex and its interactions with Sgt2, Get3, and Ydj1. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:9962-9970.
14. Simpson P.J., et al. Structures of Get3, Get4, and Get5 provide new models for TA membrane protein targeting. Structure 2010, 18:897-902.
15. Suloway C.J., et al. Tail-anchor targeting by a Get3 tetramer: the structure of an archaeal homologue. EMBO J. 2012, 31:707-719.
16. Mariappan M., et al. A ribosome-associating factor chaperones tail-anchored membrane proteins. Nature 2010, 466:1120-1124.
17. Leznicki P., et al. Bat3 promotes the membrane integration of tail-anchored proteins. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:2170-2178.
18. Wang Q., et al. A ubiquitin ligase-associated chaperone holdase maintains polypeptides in soluble states for proteasome degradation. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:758-770.
19. Winnefeld M., et al. Human SGT interacts with Bag-6/Bat-3/Scythe and cells with reduced levels of either protein display persistence of few misaligned chromosomes and mitotic arrest. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312:2500-2514.
20. Borgese N., et al. How tails guide tail-anchored proteins to their destinations. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19:368-375.
21. Brambillasca S., et al. Transmembrane topogenesis of a tail-anchored protein is modulated by membrane lipid composition. EMBO J. 2005, 24:2533-2542.
22. Mandon E.C., Gilmore R. The tail end of membrane insertion. Cell 2007, 128:1031-1032.
23. Auld K.L., et al. The conserved ATPase Get3/Arr4 modulates the activity of membrane-associated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2006, 174:215-227.
24. Schuldiner M., et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 2005, 123:507-519.
25. Schuldiner M., et al. The GET complex mediates insertion of tail-anchored proteins into the ER membrane. Cell 2008, 134:634-645.
26. Blobel G., et al. Translocation of proteins across membranes: the signal hypothesis and beyond. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1979, 33:9-36.
27. Mariappan M., et al. The mechanism of membrane-associated steps in tail-anchored protein insertion. Nature 2011, 477:61-66.
28. Stefer S., et al. Structural basis for tail-anchored membrane protein biogenesis by the Get3-receptor complex. Science 2011, 333:758-762.
29. Vilardi F., et al. WRB is the receptor for TRC40/Asna1-mediated insertion of tail-anchored proteins into the ER membrane. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:1301-1307.
30. Hessa T., et al. Protein targeting and degradation are coupled for elimination of mislocalized proteins. Nature 2011, 475:394-397.
31. Mukhopadhyay R., et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse Asna1 gene results in embryonic lethality. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580:3889-3894.
32. Rabu C., et al. Biogenesis of tail-anchored proteins: the beginning for the end?. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:3605-3612.
33. Hassdenteufel S., et al. Ca2+-calmodulin inhibits tail-anchored protein insertion into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum membrane. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585:3485-3490.
34. Fleischer T.C., et al. Systematic identification and functional screens of uncharacterized proteins associated with eukaryotic ribosomal complexes. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:1294-1307.
35. Tobaben S., et al. A trimeric protein complex functions as a synaptic chaperone machine. Neuron 2001, 31:987-999.
36. Jonikas M.C., et al. Comprehensive characterization of genes required for protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 2009, 323:1693-1697.
37. Chirico W.J., et al. 70K heat shock related proteins stimulate protein translocation into microsomes. Nature 1988, 332:805-810.
38. Engelman D.M., Steitz T.A. The spontaneous insertion of proteins into and across membranes: the helical hairpin hypothesis. Cell 1981, 23:411-422.
39. Mutka S.C., Walter P. Multifaceted physiological response allows yeast to adapt to the loss of the signal recognition particle-dependent protein-targeting pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:577-588.
40. Oh E., et al. Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 2011, 147:1295-1308.
41. Wegele H., et al. Substrate transfer from the chaperone Hsp70 to Hsp90. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 356:802-811.
42. Mateja A., et al. The structural basis of tail-anchored membrane protein recognition by Get3. Nature 2009, 461:361-366.
43. Chartron J.W., et al. The complex process of GETting tail-anchored membrane proteins to the ER. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22:217-224.
44. Sinning I., et al. It takes two to Get3. Structure 2011, 19:1353-1355.
45. Leznicki P., et al. A biochemical analysis of the constraints of tail-anchored protein biogenesis. Biochem. J. 2011, 436:719-727.
46. Reshetnyak Y.K., et al. Energetics of peptide (pHLIP) binding to and folding across a lipid bilayer membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:15340-15345.