Prediction of missed proteolytic cleavages for the selection of surrogate peptides for quantitative proteomics

OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 449-456

  Lawless, Craig ^a   Hubbard, Simon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRYPSIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84866294361     PISSN: 15362310     EISSN: 15578100     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0156     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beynon, R.J., Doherty, M.K., Pratt, J.M., and Gaskell, S.J. (2005). Multiplexed absolute quantification in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides. Nat Methods 2, 587-589.
2. Brownridge, P., and Beynon, R.J. (2011). The importance of the digest: Proteolysis and absolute quantification in proteomics. Methods 54, 351-360.
3. Brownridge, P., Holman, S.W., Gaskell, S.J., et al. (2011). Global absolute quantification of a proteome: Challenges in the deployment of a QconCAT strategy. Proteomics 11, 2957-2970.
4. Deutsch, E.W. (2010). The PeptideAtlas Project. Methods Molec Biol 604, 285-296.
5. Eyers, C.E., Lawless, C., Wedge, D.C., Lau, K.W., Gaskell, S.J., and Hubbard, S.J. (2011). CONSeQuence: Prediction of reference peptides for absolute quantitative proteomics using consensus machine learning approaches. Mol Cell Proteomics 10, M110 003384.
6. Fusaro, V.A., Mani, D.R., Mesirov, J.P., and Carr, S.A. (2009). Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 27, 190-198.
7. Gerber, S.A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M.W., and Gygi, S.P. (2003). Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 6940-6945.
8. Joachims, T. (1999). Transductive inference for text classification using Support Vector Machines. Machine Learning Proc 200-209.
9. Lange, V., Picotti, P., Domon, B., and Aebersold, R. (2008). Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: A tutorial. Mol Syst Biol 4, 222.
10. Li, Y., Hao, P., and Zhang, S. (2011). Feature-matching patternbased support vector machines for robust peptide mass fingerprinting. Molec Cellular Proteomics 10, M110 005785.
11. Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., and Marcotte, E.M. (2007). Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 25, 117-124.
12. Mallick, P., Schirle, M., Chen, S.S., et al. (2007). Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 25, 125-131.
13. Monigatti, F., and Berndt, P. (2005). Algorithm for accurate similarity measurements of peptide mass fingerprints and its application. J Am Soc Mass Spectrometry 16, 13-21.
14. Picotti, P., Bodenmiller, B., Mueller, L.N., Domon, B., and Aebersold, R. (2009). Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 138, 795-806.
15. Picotti, P., Lam, H., Campbell, D., et al. (2008). A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome. Nat Methods 5, 913-914.
16. Picotti, P., Rinner, O., Stallmach, R., et al. (2010). Highthroughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat Methods 7, 43-46.
17. Pratt, J.M., Simpson, D.M., Doherty, M.K., Rivers, J., Gaskell, S.J., and Beynon, R.J. (2006). Multiplexed absolute quantification for proteomics using concatenated signature peptides encoded by QconCAT genes. Nat Protocols 1, 1029-1043.
18. Schechter, I., and Berger, A. (1967). On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 27, 157-162.
19. Shteynberg, D., Deutsch, E.W., Lam, H., et al. (2011). iProphet: Multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates. Molec Cellular proteomics 10, M111 007690.
20. Siepen, J.A., Keevil, E.J., Knight, D., and Hubbard, S.J. (2007). Prediction of missed cleavage sites in tryptic peptides aids protein identification in proteomics. J Proteome Res 6, 399-408.
21. Tang, H., Arnold, R.J., Alves, P., et al. (2006). A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability. Bioinformatics 22, e481-e488.
22. Thiede, B., Lamer, S., Mattow, J., et al. (2000). Analysis of missed cleavage sites, tryptophan oxidation and N-terminal pyroglutamylation after in-gel tryptic digestion. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrometry 14, 496-502.
23. Webb-Robertson, B.J., Cannon, W.R., Oehmen, C.S., et al. (2010). A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics. Bioinformatics 26, 1677-1683.
24. Yen, C.Y., Russell, S., Mendoza, A.M., et al. (2006). Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using a peptide-centric database with reduced complexity: Protease cleavage and SCX elution rules from data mining of MS/MS spectra. Anal Chem 78, 1071-1084.