Correction to Implicit Training of Nonnative Speech Stimuli [Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (2011)] DOI:10.1037/a0025014;Implicit training of nonnative speech stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 363-381

  Vlahou, Eleni L ^a   Protopapas, Athanassios ^a   Seitz, Aaron R ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR LANGUAGE AND SPEECH PROCESSING   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Implicit learning; Nonnative speech perception; Perceptual learning; Phonetic training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866248454     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025992     Document Type: Erratum

References (90)

1. Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (1993). Attentional control of early perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 90, 5718-5722. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.12.5718
2. Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (1997). Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature, 387, 401-406. doi:10.1038/387401a0
3. Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233-250. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00036-6
4. Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321-324. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00063
5. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
7. Bao, S., Chan, V. T., & Merzenich, M. M. (2001). Cortical remodelling induced by activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons. Nature, 412, 79-83. doi:10.1038/35083586
8. Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package ver. 0.99875-6). Retrieved from http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
9. Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 171-204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
10. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In O. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 13-34). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
11. Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341-345.
12. Bradlow, A. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287-308). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
13. Choi, H., Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2009). When attention interrupts learning: Inhibitory effects of attention on TIPL. Vision Research, 49, 2586-2590. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.004
14. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
15. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406-416. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01232-7
16. Deacon, H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children's learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology, 49, 118-124. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118
17. Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 447-456. doi:10.1016/ j.jml.2007.11.004
18. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224-238. doi: 10.3758/BF03206487
19. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 233-277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
20. Flege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities (pp. 319-358). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110895094.319
21. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116-124. doi:10.3758/BF03195503
22. Frankó, E., Seitz, A. R., & Vogels, R. (2010). Dissociable neural effects of long-term stimulus-reward pairing in macaque visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1425-1439. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21288
23. Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P., & West, M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 8030-8035. doi:10.1073/pnas.1332441100
24. Golestani, N., & Zatorre, R. J. (2004). Learning new sounds of speech: Reallocation of neural substrates. NeuroImage, 21, 494-506. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.071
25. Goudbeek, M., Cutler, A., & Smits, R. (2008). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories. Speech Communication, 50, 109-125. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2007.07.003
26. Gros-Louis, J., West, M. J., Goldstein, M. H., & King, A. P. (2006). Mothers provide differential feedback to infants' prelinguistic sounds. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 509-516. doi: 10.1177/0165025406071914
27. Guenther, F. H., & Gjaja, M. N. (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1111-1121. doi:10.1121/1.416296
28. Guenther, F. H., Nieto-Castanon, A., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2004). Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 46-57. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/005)
29. Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In O. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 57-77). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
30. Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2009). English /r/-/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469-479. doi:10.1121/1.3021295
31. Herzog, M. H., & Fahle, M. (1997). The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task. Vision Research, 37, 2133-2141.
32. Herzog, M. H., & Fahle, M. (1998). Modeling perceptual learning: Difficulties and how they can be overcome. Biological Cybernetics, 78, 107-117.
33. Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1305-1316. doi:10.1037/ 0096-1523.34.5.1305
34. Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267-3278. doi:10.1121/1.2062307
35. Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47- B57. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00198-1
36. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434-446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
37. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124. doi:10.1080/02724980042000516
38. Kilgard, M. P., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998). Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science, 279, 1714-1718. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5357.1714
39. Kim, R., Seitz, A., Feenstra, H., & Shams, L. (2009). Testing assumptions of statistical learning: Is it long-term and implicit? Neuroscience Letters, 461, 145-149. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.030
40. Kondaurova, M. V., & Francis, A. L. (2010). The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: Comparison of three training methods. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 569-587. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.003
41. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 1-15. doi:10.1016/ j.jml.2006.07.010
42. Lacerda, F. (1995). The perceptual-magnet effect: An emergent consequence of the exemplar-based phonetic memory. In K. Elenius & P. Branderyd (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 140-147). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH and Stockholm University.
43. Lim, S.-J., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: Videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cognitive Science. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01192.x/abstract
44. Lin, J. Y., Pype, A. D., Murray, S. O., & Boynton, G. M. (2010). Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time. PLoS Biology, 8, e1000337. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000337
45. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242-1255. doi:10.1121/ 1.408177
46. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874-886. doi:10.1121/1.1894649
47. Logan, J. S., & Pruitt, J. S. (1995). Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native phonemes. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 351-377). Timonium, MD: York Press.
48. Maye, J., & Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phoneme categories without minimal pairs. In S. C. Howel, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 522-533). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
49. Maye, J., Weiss, D. J., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization. Developmental Science, 11, 122-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00653.x
50. Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101-B111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3
51. McCandliss, B., Conway, M., Protopapas, A., & McClelland, J. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the -[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Predictions of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89-108. doi:10.3758/CABN.2.2.89
52. Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., Jenkins, J. J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331-340. doi:10.3758/BF03211209
53. Munro, M. J., & Bohn, O.-S. (2007). The study of second language speech: A brief overview. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 3-11). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
54. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238. doi:10.1016/S00100285(03)00006-9
55. Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401-426. doi:10.1037/00963445.130.3.401
56. Pederson, E., & Guion-Anderson, S. (2010). Orienting attention during phonetic training facilitates learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, EL54-EL59. doi:10.1121/1.3292286
57. Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233-238. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006
58. Petrov, A., Dosher, B., & Lu, Z.-L. (2006). Perceptual learning without feedback in non-stationary contexts: Data and model. Vision Research, 46, 3177-3197.
59. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
60. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46, 115-154. doi: 10.1177/00238309030460020501
61. Pisoni, D. B., & Lively, S. E. (1995). Variability and invariance in speech perception: A new look at some old problems in perceptual learning. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 433-459). Timonium, MD: York Press.
62. Port, R. (2007). The graphical basis of phones and phonemes. In O. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 349-365). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
63. Protopapas, A., & Calhoun, B. (2000, August). Adaptive phonetic training for second language learners. In P. Delcloque (Ed.), Integrating speech technology in language learning and the assistive interface (Proceedings of InSTIL, 2000) (pp. 31-38). Dundee, England: InSTIL.
64. Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006). Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1684-1696. doi:10.1121/1.2161427
65. Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413-425. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002
66. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
67. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235. doi:10.1037/00963445.118.3.219
68. Recanzone, G. H., Schreiner, C. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (1993). Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. The Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 87-103.
69. Rosenthal, O., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Perceptual organization without perception: The subliminal learning of global contour. Psychological Science, 21, 1751-1758. doi:10.1177/0956797610389188
70. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
71. Saffran, J. R., Werker, J. F., & Werner, L. A. (2006). The infants auditory world: Hearing, speech and the beginnings of language. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception and language (Vol. 2, pp. 58-108). New York, NY: Wiley.
72. Seitz, A. R., & Dinse, H. R. (2007). A common framework for perceptual learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 148-153. doi:10.1016/ j.conb.2007.02.004
73. Seitz, A. R., Kim, D., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans. Neuron, 61, 700-707. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.016
74. Seitz, A. R., Kim, R., van Wassenhove, V., & Shams, L. (2007). Simultaneous and independent acquisition of multisensory and unisensory association. Perception, 36, 1445-1453. doi:10.1068/p5843
75. Seitz, A. R., Nánez, J. E., Holloway, S. R., & Watanabe, T. (2005). Visual experience can substantially alter critical flicker fusion thresholds. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 20, 55-60. doi: 10.1002/hup.661
76. Seitz, A. R., Nánez, J. E., Holloway, S. R., & Watanabe, T. (2006). Perceptual learning of motion leads to faster flicker perception. PLoS ONE, 1, e28. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000028
77. Seitz, A. R., Protopapas, A., Tsushima, Y., Vlahou, E. L., Gori, S., Grossberg, S., & Watanabe, T. (2010). Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training. Cognition, 115, 435-443. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.004
78. Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2003). Is subliminal learning really passive? Nature, 422, 36. doi:10.1038/422036a
79. Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2005). A unified model for perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 329-334. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.010
80. Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2009). The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning. Vision Research, 49, 2604-2610. doi:10.1016/ j.visres.2009.08.003
81. Steffler, D. J. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21, 168-204. doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0517
82. Strange, W. (1995). Cross-language studies of speech perception: A historical review. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 3-45). Timonium, MD: York Press.
83. Tricomi, E., Delgado, M. R., McCandliss, B. D., McClelland, J. L., & Fiez, J. A. (2006). Performance feedback drives caudate activation in a phonological learning task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1029-1043. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1029
84. Tsushima, Y., Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2008). Task-irrelevant learning occurs only when the irrelevant feature is weak. Current Biology, 18, R516-R517. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.029
85. Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552-564. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
86. Vallabha, G. K., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Success and failure of new speech category learning in adulthood: Consequences of learned Hebbian attractors in topographic maps. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 53-73. doi:10.3758/CABN.7.1.53
87. Wade, T., & Holt, L. (2005). Incidental categorization of spectrally complex non-invariant auditory stimuli in a computer game task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2618-2633. doi:10.1121/1.2011156
88. Watanabe, T., Nánez, J. E., & Sasaki, Y. (2001). Perceptual learning without perception. Nature, 413, 844-848. doi:10.1038/35101601
89. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984a). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence of perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 49-63. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3
90. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984b). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866-1878. doi:10.1121/1.390988