Measuring for knowledge: A data-driven research approach for egovernment

Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 417-424

  Verdegem, Pieter ^a   Stragier, Jeroen ^a   Verleye, Gino ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Egovernment; Evaluation; Management; Methodology; Structural equation modeling (SEM)

Indexed keywords

CONTEXTUAL VARIABLES; CURRENT STATUS; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; E-GOVERNMENT; ELECTRONIC SERVICES; EVALUATION; KNOWLEDGE BASE; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE PUBLIC SERVICES; PUBLIC SERVICES; RESEARCH APPROACH; SAMPLE DATA; STATISTICAL TESTING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; USER-CENTRIC;

BENCHMARKING; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; STATISTICAL TESTS;

DIGITAL STORAGE;

EID: 84865603713     PISSN: 20491034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bagozzi, R.P. (1980). Causal models in marketing. New York: Wiley.
2. Bannister, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of eGovernment comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171-188.
3. Bekkers, V. & Homburg, V. (2007). The myths of eGovernment: looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society, 23(5), 373-382.
4. Centeno, C., Van Bavel, R. & Burgelman, J.C. (2004). eGovernment in the EU in the next decade: vision and key challenges. European Commission, DG JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
5. Codagnone, C. (2008). Editorial: efficiency and effectiveness. European Journal of ePractice. No. 4, August 2008, 2-3. Retrieved 14/01/2010, from: http://www.epracticejournal.eu/volume/4.
6. Codagnone, C. & Boccardelli, P. (2006). Measurement framework final version. Delivered within the eGEP Project for the European Commission, DG Information Society, Unit H2. Retrieved 14/01/2010, from: http://82.187.13.175/eGEP/Static/Contents/final/D.2.4_Measurement_Framework_final_version.pdf.
7. Codagnone, C. & Undheim, T.A. (2008). Benchmarking eGovernment: tools, theory and practice. No. 4, August 2008, 4-18. Retrieved 14/01/2010, from: http://www.epracticejournal.eu/document/4970.
8. Eurostat (2009b). EGovernment usage by individuals by gender - Percentage of individuals aged 16 to 74 using the internet for interaction with public authorities. Retrieved 14/01/2010, from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsiir130.
9. Heeks, R. (2003). Reinventing government in the information age. International practise in IT-enabled public sector reform. London: Routledge.
10. Heeks, R. & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing eGovernment research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265.
11. Jaeger, P.T. & Thompson, K.M. (2003). EGovernment around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389-394.
12. Janssen, D., Rotthier, S. & Snijkers, K. (2004). If you measure it they will score: an assessment of international eGovernment benchmarking. Information Polity, 9(3-4), 121-130.
13. Kunstelj, M., Jukic, T. & Vintar, M. (2007). Analysing the demand side of eGovernment: what can we learn from Slovenian users? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4556, 305-317.
14. Millard, J. (2008). eGovernment measurement for policy makers. European Journal of ePractice, No. 4, August 2008, 19-32. Retrieved 14/01/2010, from: http://www.epracticejournal.eu/document/4971.
15. OECD (2003). The eGovernment imperative. Paris: OECD EGovernment Studies.
16. OECD (2005). EGovernment for better government. Paris: OECD Publications Service.
17. OECD (2008). Belgium: OECD Country Report. Paris: OECD EGovernment Studies.
18. Peters, R., Janssen, M. & van Engers, T. (2005). Measuring eGovernment impact: existing practices and shortcomings. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, session: eGovernment services and policy track (Copenhagen, August 22-26, 2005), New York, ACM Press, 480-489.
19. Relyea, H.C. (2002). E-gov: introduction and overview. Government Information Quarterly, 19(1), 9-35. Traunmüller, R. & Wimmer, M. (2004). EGovernment: the challenges ahead. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3183, 1-6.
20. Traunmüller, R. & Wimmer, M. (2004). EGovernment: the challenges ahead. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3183, 1-6.
21. van Deursen, A. & van Dijk, J. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 333-340.
22. van Dijk, J., Peters, O. & Ebbers, W. (2008). Explaining the acceptance and use of government internet services: a multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 379-399.
23. Verdegem, P. & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered EGovernment in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497.
24. Yildiz, M. (2007). EGovernment research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646-665.