Risk based microbiological criteria for Campylobacter in broiler meat in the European Union

International Journal of Food Microbiology

Volumn 158, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 209-217

  Nauta, Maarten J ^a   Sanaa, Moez ^b   Havelaar, Arie H ^c,d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b FRENCH AGENCY FOR FOOD   (France)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Broiler meat; Campylobacter; Microbiological criterion; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BROILER; CAMPYLOBACTER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD CHAIN; FOOD SAFETY; HEALTH HAZARD; MEAT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CAMPYLOBACTER; CHICKENS; EUROPE; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD SAFETY; HUMANS; MEAT; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CAMPYLOBACTER;

EID: 84865540582     PISSN: 01681605     EISSN: 18793460     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anonymous Recommended international code of practice-general principles of food hygiene. CAC/GL 21-1997 1997, Codex Alimentarius Joint Office, Rome.
2. Anonymous The use of microbiological risk assessment outputs to develop practical risk management strategies: metrics to improve food safety. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert meeting, Kiel, Germany 2006.
3. Baré J., Depraetere O., Uyttendaele M., Habib I., Houf K., De Zutter L. Comparison of the Campylobacter contamination on different sites of broiler carcasses. Proceedings of the16th International Workshop on Campylobacter, Helicobacter and Related Organisms 2011, 62. CHRO 2011, Vancouver, Canada.
4. Black R.E., Levine M.M., Clements M.L., Hughes T.P., Blaser M.J. Experimental Campylobacter jejuni infection in humans. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1988, 157:472-479.
5. Christensen B., Sommer H., Nielsen N., Rosenquist H. Risk assessment of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Products 2001, The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, Copenhagen, Denmark, 138 pp.
6. Christensen B.B., Rosenquist H., Sommer H.M., Nielsen N.L., Fagt S., Andersen N.L., Norrung B. A model of hygiene practices and consumption patterns in the consumer phase. Risk Analysis 2005, 25:49-60.
7. EFSA Opinion of the scientific panel on biological hazards (BIOHAZ) on microbiological criteria and targets based on risk analysis. The EFSA Journal 2007, 462:1-29.
8. EFSA Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008, part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA Journal 2010, 8(03):1503.
9. EFSA Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses, in the EU, 2008; part B: Analysis of factors associated with Campylobacter colonisation of broiler batches and with Campylobacter contamination of broiler carcasses; and investigation of the culture method diagnostic characteristics used to analyse broiler carcass samples. The EFSA Journal 2010, 8(8):1522.
10. EFSA Scientific opinion on the link between Salmonella criteria at different stages of the poultry production chain. EFSA Journal 2010, 8(3):1545.
11. EFSA Scientific opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA Journal 2011, 9(4):2105.
12. EFSA Simulation based assessment of microbiological criteria for Salmonella in poultry meat. EFSA Journal 2011, 9(2):1986.
13. FAO/WHO Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme CODEX Committee on food hygiene. Proposed draft guidelines for control of Campylobacter and Salmonella spp. in chicken meat (N08-2007), Coronado, USA 2009.
14. Fischer A.R.H., De Jonge A.E.I., De Jonge R., Frewer L.J., Nauta M.J. Improving food safety in the domestic environment: the need for a transdisciplinary approach. Risk Analysis 2005, 25(3):503-517.
15. Haas C.N. Conditional dose-response relationships for microorganisms: development and application. Risk Analysis 2002, 22:455-463.
16. Hansson I., Pudas N., Harbom B., Olsson Engvall E. Within-flock variations of Campylobacter loads in caeca and on carcasses from broilers. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2010, 141:51-55.
17. Havelaar A.H., Nauta M.J., Jansen J.T. Fine-tuning food safety objectives and risk assessment. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2004, 93:11-29.
18. Lorimer M.F., Kiermeier A. Analysing microbiological data: Tobit or not Tobit?. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2007, 116:313-318.
19. Nauta M., Christensen B. The impact of consumer phase models in microbial risk analysis. Risk Analysis 2011, 31:255-265.
20. Nauta M.J., Havelaar A.H. Risk-based standards for Campylobacter in the broiler meat chain. Food Control 2008, 19:372-381.
21. Nauta M.J., Jacobs-Reitsma W.F., Havelaar A.H. A risk assessment model for Campylobacter in broiler meat. Risk Analysis 2007, 27:845-861.
22. Nauta M.J., Fischer A.R.H., Van Asselt E.D., De Jong A.E.I., Frewer L.J., De Jonge R. Food safety in the domestic environment: the effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:179-192.
23. Nauta M.J., Hill A., Rosenquist H., Brynestad S., Fetsch A., Van der Logt P., Fazil A., Christensen B., Katsma E., Borck B., Havelaar A.H. A comparison of risk assessments on Campylobacter in broiler meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2009, 129:107-123.
24. Ross T., Chan C. Microbiological criteria and microbiological risk assessment. Microbiological Risk Assessment in Food Processing 2002, 214-247. Woodhead Publishing Ltd. M. Brown, M. Stringer (Eds.).
25. Satelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Saisana M., Tarantola S. Global sensitivity analysis. The Primer 2008, 292. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
26. Stringer M. Summary report. Food safety objectives-role in microbiological food safety management. Food Control 2005, 16:775-794.
27. Teunis P.F., Havelaar A.H. The Beta Poisson dose-response model is not a single-hit model. Risk Analysis 2000, 20:513-520.
28. Van Schothorst M., Zwietering M.H., Ross T., Buchanan R.L., Cole M.B. Relating microbiological criteria to food safety objectives and performance objectives. Food Control 2009, 20:967-979. International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF).
29. WHO The increasing incidence of human campylobacteriosis. Report and Proceedings of a WHO Consultation of Experts, Copenhagen, Denmark 2000, WHO/CDS/CSR/APH 2001.7.