Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 782-792

  Hu, Paul Jen Hwa ^a   Hui, Wendy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Learning effectiveness; Learning engagement; Learning satisfaction; Technology mediated learning

Indexed keywords

ADOBE PHOTOSHOP; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS; LEARNING ENGAGEMENT; LEARNING MATERIALS; LEARNING PROCESS; LEARNING SATISFACTION; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED LEARNING; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS; VIDEO CONTENTS;

MODEL STRUCTURES; STUDENTS;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84865499686     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (71)

1. M. Alavi, and D.E. Leidner Research commentary: technology-mediated learning - a call for greater depth and breadth of research Information Systems Research 12 1 2001 1 10
2. M. Alavi, B.C. Wheeler, and J.S. Valacich Using IT to reengineer business education: an exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning MIS Quarterly 19 3 1995 293 312
3. I.E. Allen, and J. Seaman Making the grade: online education in the United States Available at: www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/making-the- grade.pdf 2006 Last accessed: 16 March 2009
4. F. Anaraki Developing an effective and efficient elearning platform International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management 12 2 2004 57 63
5. L.M. Angelino, F.K. Williams, and D. Natvig Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates Journal of Educators Online 4 2 2007 1 14
6. J.B. Arbaugh How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in internet-based MBA courses Business Communication Quarterly 63 4 2000 9 26
7. R.P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi, and S. Singh On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs: two extensions International Journal of Research in Marketing 8 1991 125 140
8. A. Bandura Human agency in social cognitive theory The American Psychologist 44 1989 1175 1184
9. R. Benbunan-Fich, and S.R. Hiltz Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 46 2003 298 312
10. R. Bernard, P. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, and L. Wozney How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of empirical literature Review of Educational Research 74 3 2004 379 439
11. R.M. Bernard, P.C. Abrami, Y. Lou, and E. Borokhovski A methodological morass? How we can improve quantitative research in distance education Distance Education 25 2004 175 198
12. J. Billiet, B. Cambré, and J. Welkenhuysen-Gybels Equivalence of measurement instruments for attitude variables in comparative surveys, taking method effects into account: the case of ethnocentrism A. Ferligoj, A. Mrvar, Developments in Social Science Methodology 2002 FDV Ljubljana 53 72
13. E. Blass, and A. Davis Building on solid foundations: establishing criteria for e-learning development Journal of Further and Higher Education 27 3 2003 227 245
14. E. Bonakdarian, T. Whittaker, and Y. Yang Mixing it up: more experiments in hybrid learning Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 25 4 2010 97 103
15. R.E. Brown The process of community-building in distance learning classes Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 2 2001 18 35
16. B.W. Brown, and C.E. Liedholm Web courses replace the classroom in principles of microeconomics? The American Economic Review 92 2 2002 444 448
17. A. Burton-Jones Minimizing method bias through programmatic research MIS Quarterly 33 3 2009 445 471
18. R. Carini, G. Kuh, and S. Klein Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages Research in Higher Education 47 2006 1 32
19. R.D. Carlson, and B.L. Grabowski The effects of computer self-efficacy on direction-following behavior in computer assisted instruction Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 19 2002 6 11
20. M. Chen Gender and computers: the beneficial effects of experience on attitudes Journal of Educational Computing Research 2 3 1986 265 282
21. W.W. Chin The partial least square approach to structural equation modeling G.A. Marcoulides, Modern Methods for Business Research 2009 Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ 50 170
22. W.W. Chin, B.L. Marcolin, and P.R. Newsted A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, Ohio 1996 21 41
23. S.W. Chou, and C.H. Liu Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 1 2005 65 76
24. R.E. Clark Media will never influence learning ETR&D-Educational Technology Research and Development 42 2 1994 21 29
25. CNN.com Adobe in Photoshop freebie Available at: http://money.cnn.com/ 2007/03/01/technology/adobe/ March 1 2007 Last accessed: 16 March 2009
26. D.R. Compeau, and C.A. Higgins Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test MIS Quarterly 19 2 1995 189 211
27. F. Concannon, A. Flynn, and M. Campbell What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning British Journal of Educational Technology 36 3 2005 501 512
28. E.C. Davenport Jr. Significance testing of congruence coefficients: a good idea? Educational and Psychological Measurement 50 1990 289 296
29. S.B. Eom, J.H. Wen, and N. Ashill The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online satisfaction: an empirical investigation Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 4 2 2006 215 235
30. C. Fornell, and D.F. Larcker Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics Journal of Marketing Research 18 3 1981 382 388
31. D. Francescato, R. Porcelli, M. Mebane, M. Cuddetta, J. Klobas, and P. Renzi Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts Computers in Human Behavior 22 2006 163 176
32. J.A. Fredricks, P.C. Blumenfeld, and A.H. Paris School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence Review of Educational Research 74 2004 59 109
33. D.R. Garrison, and T. Anderson E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice 2003 RoutledgeFalmer London
34. D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, and M. Boudreau Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice Communications of the AIS 4 2000 (Article 7)
35. M.E. Gist, C. Schwoerer, and B. Rosen Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training The Journal of Applied Psychology 74 1989 884 891
36. H. Harman Modern Factor Analysis 3rd edition 1976 University of Chicago Press Chicago
37. Y. Hayashi, M. Ikeda, and R. Mizoguchi A design environment to articulate design intention of learning contents International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning 14 3 2004 276 296
38. S.R. Hiltz, and P. Shea The student in the online classroom S.R. Hiltz, R. Goldman, Learning together online: research on asynchronous learning networks 2005 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 145 168
39. P.J.H. Hu, W. Hui, T.H.K. Clark, and K.Y. Tam Technology-assisted learning and learning style: a longitudinal field experiment IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A 33 6 2007 1099 1112
40. S. Hu, G. Kuh, and S. Li The effects of engagement in inquiry-oriented activities on student learning and personal development Innovative Higher Education 33 2 2008 71 81
41. G. Kearsley, and B. Shneiderman Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning Educational Technology 38 5 1998 20 23
42. J. Keller Motivational design of instruction C. Reigeluth, Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status 1983 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ 386 434
43. D.A. Kolb, I.M. Rubin, and J. Osland Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 1990 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
44. R.K. Ladyshewsky E-learning compared with face to face: differences in the academic achievement of postgraduate business students Australian Journal of Educational Technology 20 3 2004 316 336
45. D.E. Leidner, and M. Fuller Improving student learning of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning Decision Support Systems 20 2 1997 149 163
46. Y. Levy Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses Computers in Education 48 2 2007 185 204
47. S.S. Liaw, H.M. Huang, and G.D. Chen An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems Computers in Human Behavior 23 2007 1906 1920
48. G.M. Marakas, M.Y. Yi, and R.D. Johnson The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research Information Systems Research 9 2 1998 126 163
49. R.L. Martens, J. Gulikers, and T. Bastiaens The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 2004 368 376
50. R. Martens, T. Bastiaens, and P.A. Kirschner New learning design in distance education: the impact on student perception and motivation Distance Education 28 1 2007 81 93
51. M. Martinez High attrition rates in e-learning: challenges, predictors, and solutions The eLearning Developers Journal July 14 2003 1 9
52. G. Natriello Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools Journal of Research & Development in Education 17 1984 14 24
53. C. Neuhauser Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction American Journal of Distance Education 16 2002 99 113
54. C.-S. Ong, J.-Y. Lai, and Y.-S. Wang Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies Information and Management 41 6 2004 795 804
55. R. Phipps, and J. Merisotis What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education April 1999 The Institute for Higher Education Policy
56. G. Piccoli, R. Ahmad, and B. Ives Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training MIS Quarterly 25 4 2001 401 426
57. M. Pivec, and O. Dziabenko Game-based learning in universities and lifelong learning: UniGame: social skills and knowledge training Journal of Universal Computer Science 10 1 2004 14 26
58. J.C. Richardson, and K. Swan Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 1 2003 68 88
59. C.C. Robinson, and H. Hullinger New benchmarks in higher education: student engagement in online learning The Journal of Education for Business 84 2 2008 101 108
60. A.P. Rovai, and J.D. Baker Gender differences in online learning: sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions Quarterly Review of Distance Education 6 1 2005 31 46
61. A.P. Rovai, T. Kirk, and K.T. Barnum On-line course effectiveness: an analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning Journal of Distance Education 18 1 2003 57 73
62. D.J. Spence, and E.L. Usher Engagement with mathematics courseware in traditional and online remedial learning environments: relationship to self-efficacy and achievement Journal of Educational Computing Research 37 3 2007 267 288
63. L. Tai Corporate e-Learning 2007 Oxford University Press
64. G. Taylor, and O. Nikolova Influence of gender and academic ability in computer-based Spanish reading task Roeper Review 27 1 2004 42 51
65. G. Torkzadeh, K. Plfughoeft, and L. Hall Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: an empirical study Behaviour & Information Technology 18 1999 299 309
66. Wainhouse Research The distance education and e-learning landscape-Volume 1: learning management platforms, software and tools, November 2007 Available at: http://www.wainhouse.com/images/reports/wrdistedelearnv1.pdf 2007 Last accessed: 13 June 2010
67. Y.-S. Wang Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems Information and Management 41 2003 75 86
68. P. Wyman Is e-learning the future or just a big waste of time? Available at: http://www.howtolearn.com/freearticles/article-24.php 2007 Last accessed: 17 March 2009
69. D. Xu, and H. Wang Intelligent agent supported personalization for virtual learning environments Decision Support Systems 42 2 2006 825 843
70. D. Zhang Virtual mentor and the lab system-toward building an interactive, personalized, and intelligent e-learning environment Journal of Computer Information Systems 44 3 2004 35 43
71. D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R.O. Briggs, and J.F. Nunamaker Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness Information and Management 43 2006 15 27