New learning design in distance education: The impact on student perception and motivation

Distance Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 81-93

  Martens, Rob ^a,b   Bastiaens, Theo ^b,c   Kirschner, Paul A ^b,d  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAGEN   (Germany)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248579124     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910701305327     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bastiaens, Th., & Martens, R. (2000). Conditions for web-based learning with real events. In B. Abbey (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education. Hershey, PA: The Idea Group.
2. Bitter, M., Sloep, P., & Jansen, D. (2003). Learning to change: The Virtual Business Learning approach to professional workplace learning. Educational Technology and Society, 6, 18-25.
3. Bjorklund, D. F. (1997). The role of immaturity in human development. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 153-169.
4. Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). The origins of human nature: Evolutionary developmental psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (in press). Assessment of students' feelings of autonomy, competence, and social relatedness: A new approach to measuring the quality of the learning process through self-assessment. In M. S. R. Segers, F. J. R. C. Dochy, & E. C. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new methods of assessment: In search of quality and staruiards. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
6. Broekkamp, H., van Hout-Wolters, B., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2002). Importance in instructional text: Teachers' and students' perceptions of task demands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 260-272.
7. Brush, T. A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 5-18.
8. Dalgarno, B. (1998). Choosing learner activities for specific learning outcomes: A tool for constructivist computer assisted learning design. In C. McBeath & R. Atkinson (Eds.), Planning for progress, partnership and profit: Proceedings EdTech'98. Perth: Australian Society for Educational Technology.
9. Dillenbourg, P., Eurlings, A., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). European perspectives on computer supported learning. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht.
10. Driscoll, M. P., Moallem, M., Dick, W., & Kirby, J. E. (1994). How does the textbook contribute to learning in a middle school science class? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 79-100.
11. EARLI. (2001). 9th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction: Abstracts. Fribourg, Switzerland: University of Fribourg.
12. Gagné, R., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College Publishers.
13. Gros, B. (2001). Instructional design for computer-supported collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 439-451.
14. Heckhausen, J. (2000). Evolutionary perspectives on human motivation. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1015-1029.
15. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 23 -48.
16. Howland, J. J., & Moore, J. L. (2002). Student perceptions as distance learners in Internet-based courses. Distance Education, 23, 183-197.
17. Kaatinen, S., & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 12, 189-212.
18. Kessels, J. (1999). A relational approach to curriculum design. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & Tj. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 59-71). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
19. Martens, R., Jochems, W., & Kirschner, P. (Eds.). (2002). De didactiek van e-learning [The didactics of e-learning], Verzameling papers gepresenteerd tijdens symposium op de Onderwijs Research Dagen in Antwerpen, 2002. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
20. Martens, R., Valcke, M., Poelmans, P., & Daal, M. (1996). Functions, use and effects of embedded support devices in printed distance learning materials. Learning and Instruction, 6, 77-93.
21. Martens, R., Valcke, M., Portier, S., Weges, H., & Poelmans, P. (1997). Research with interactive learning environments in three content domains: Descriptive statistics, continuous mathematics and substantive criminal law. Distance Education: An International Journal, 18, 44-58.
22. Martens, R. L. (1998). The use and effects of embedded support devices in independent learning. Ph.D. thesis, Uitgeverij Lemma BV, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
23. Naidu, S., & Bernard, J. (1992). Enhancing academic performance in distance education with concept mapping and inserted questions. Distance Education: An International Journal, 13, 218-233.
24. Pierce, J. W., & Jones, B. F. (1998). Problem based learning: Learning and teaching in the context of problems. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in and beyond school (pp. 75-106). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.
25. Reiser, R. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology. Part 2: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 57-67.
26. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
27. Simons, R.-J., van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. (2000). New learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
28. Sluijsmans, D. (2002). Student involvement in assessment. The training of peer assessment skills. Ph.D. thesis, Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
29. Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic of motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 5-22.
30. Stoof, A., Martens, R., van Merriënboer, J., & Bastiaens, Th. (2002). The boundary approach of competence: A constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 345-365.
31. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (2002). Computer-based tools for instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50, 5-9.
32. Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation [Ph.D. thesis]. Enschede, the Netherlands: Print Partners Ipskamp.
33. Vermetten, Y., Vermunt, J., & Lodewijks, H. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263-285.
34. Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235.
35. Wöretshofer, J., & Nadolski, R. (1998). Arrondissement Zomerweelde - een elektronische oefenrechtbank [Arrondissment Zomerweelde, an electronic training court]. Recht & Elektronische Media, 3, 20-21.