Temporary inhibitory tagging at previously attended locations: Evidence from event-related potentials

Psychophysiology

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1191-1199

  Zhang, Yang ^a   Zhou, Xiaolin ^b   Zhang, Ming ^a,c  

^a NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TIANJIN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

ERP; Inhibition of return; Inhibitory tagging; IOR; N450; Stroop effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR VISION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST;

EID: 84865278115     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01412.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Barnett, K. J., Waldie, K. E., & Kirk, I. J. (2009). An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: The role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution. Brain Research, 1253, 139-148. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.069
2. Chen, Q., Wei, P., & Zhou, X. (2006). Distinct neural correlates for resolving Stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1937-1946. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1937
3. Coles, M. G. H., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. In M. G. H. Coles & M. D. Rugg (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
5. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1982). The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology, 14, 1-52. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(82)90016-3
6. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Kopell, B. S. (1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938-940. doi:10.1126/science.7302571
7. Eimer, M. (1994). An ERP study on visual sptial priming with peripheral onsets. Psychophysiology, 31, 154-163. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01035.x
8. Fuentes, L. (2004). Inhibitory processing in the attentional networks. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 45-55). New York: Guilford.
9. Fuentes, L., Boucart, M., Vivas, A., Alvarez, R., & Zimmerman, M. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: Evidence from the Stroop task. Neuropsychology, 14, 134-140. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.14.1.134
10. Fuentes, L., Vivas, A., & Humphreys, G. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 149-164. doi:10.1080/027249899391269
11. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031.
12. Handy, T., & Jha, A. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science, 10, 157-161. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00124
13. Hanslmayr, S., Pastotter, B., Bauml, K. H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., & Klimesch, W. (2008). The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 215-225. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20020
14. Ilan, A. B., & Polich, J. (1999). P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 367-373. doi:S0168559798000537
15. Ishihara, S. (1990). Ishihara's tests for colour-blindness. Tokyo: Shuppan.
16. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. C., MacDonald, A. W., III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026. doi:10.1126/science.1089910
17. Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicoeur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250-274. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x
18. Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
19. Kingstone, A. (2007). Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search. Visual Cognition, 12, 238-256. doi:10.1080/13506280600724892
20. Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431. doi:10.1038/334430a0
21. Lansbergen, M. M., van Hell, E., & Kenemans, J. L. (2007). Impulsivity and conflict in the Stroop task: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 33-50. doi:10.1027/0269-8803.21.1.33
22. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1993). Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials. I: Scalp topography. Brain Topography, 6, 51-63. doi:10.1007/BF01234127
23. Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., Perez, R., & Mayberg, H. S. (2000). An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 38, 701-711. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00106-2
24. Luck, S. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. McDonald, J. J., Hickey, C., Green, J. J., & Whitman, J. C. (2009). Inhibition of return in the covert deployment of attention: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 725-733. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21042
26. McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1411-1423. doi:10.3758/BF03206190
27. Muller, N. G., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the attentional spotlight: Neuronal correlates of attentional capture and inhibition of return in early visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 587-593. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.587
28. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387-391. doi:10.1038/nature03390
29. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2002). Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, 24(Suppl. D), 5-12.
30. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance, X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2009a). On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return. Psychophysiology, 46, 1278-1287. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00858.x
32. Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2009b). Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 991-999. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21105
33. Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science, 15, 272-276. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00665.x
34. Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2006). Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Brain Research, 1072, 161-174. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.081
35. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., & Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22, 367-378. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.367
36. Rosenfeld, J. P., & Skogsberg, K. R. (2006). P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: The evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 240-250. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.05.010
37. Spalek, T. M., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 327-331. doi:10.3758/BF03194072
38. Swick, D., & Turken, A. U. (2002). Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 16354-16359. doi:10.1073/pnas.252521499
39. Szucs, D., & Soltesz, F. (2007). Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3190-3202. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.013
40. Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2009). Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 71, 1241-1250. doi:10.3758/APP.71.6.1241
41. Tian, Y., & Yao, D. (2008). A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task. Biological Psychology, 79, 171-178. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.006
42. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38, 816-827. doi:10.1017/S0048577201000610
43. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 27, 497-504. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.042
44. Vivas, A. B., & Fuentes, L. J. (2001). Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 315-323. doi:10.3758/BF03196167
45. Vivas, A. B., Fuentes, L. J., Estevez, A. F., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return: Evidence from flanker interference with multiple distractor features. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 320-326. doi:10.3758/BF03194071
46. Vivas, A. B., Humphreys, G. W., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Inhibitory processing following damage to the parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1531-1540. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00063-0
47. Wascher, E., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: An EEG study of inhibition of return. Psychophysiology, 41, 716-728. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00198.x
48. West, R. (2003). Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1122-1135. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00297-X
49. West, R., Bowry, R., & McConville, C. (2004). Sensitivity of medial frontal cortex to response and nonresponse conflict. Psychophysiology, 41, 739-748. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00205.x
50. West, R., Jakubek, K., Wymbs, N., Perry, M., & Moore, K. (2005). Neural correlates of conflict processing. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 38-48. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2366-y
51. Zhang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Semantic processing is affected in inhibition of return: Evidence from an event-related potentials study. NeuroReport, 18, 267-271. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32801231a9