Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 991-999

  Prime, David J ^a   Jolicoeur, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INHIBITION OF RETURN; MALE; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 66049089555     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21105     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Band, G. P. H., Ridderinkof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (2003). Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: The roles of activation and inhibition. Psychological Research, 67, 266-279.
2. Bekker, E. M., Kenemans, J. L., & Verbaten, M. N. (2005). Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 221-231.
3. Berlucchi, G. (2006). Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1065-1074.
4. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546. (Pubitemid 39536251)
5. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
6. Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science, 9, 441-447.
7. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 307-314.
8. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2004). Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 542-550.
9. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2006). Inhibition of return: Sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 908-919.
10. Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
11. Klein, R. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
12. Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition, with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1993). Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials I: Scalp topography. Brain Topography, 6, 51-63.
14. Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 392-418.
15. McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1411-1423.
16. Mulder, G., Wijers, A. A., Brookhuis, K. A., Smid, H. G. O. M., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1994). Selective visual attention: Selective cuing, selective cognitive processing, and selective response processing. In H. J. Heinze, T. F. Münte, & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), Cognitive electrophysiology (pp. 26-80). Boston: Birkhäuser.
17. Müller, N. G., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the attentional spotlight: Neuronal correlates of attentional capture and inhibition of return in early visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 587-593. (Pubitemid 46495290)
18. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26.
19. Paus, T. (2001). Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 417-424.
20. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
22. Pratt, J., Adam, J., & O'Donnell, C. (2005). Response selection influences inhibition of return. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 319-328. (Pubitemid 40695222)
23. Prime, D. J., Visser, T. A. W., & Ward, L. M. (2006). Reorienting attention and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1310-1323.
24. Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science, 15, 272-276.
25. Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2006). Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Brain Research, 1072, 161-174.
26. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., & Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 367-378.
27. Shipp, S. (2004). The brain circuitry of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 223-230.
28. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily associated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25, 55-71.
29. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 625-643.
30. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593-602. (Pubitemid 34553655)
31. Wascher, E., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: An EEG study of inhibition of return. Psychophysiology, 41, 716-728.
32. Wickelgren, W. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.