Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1241-1250

  Thomas, Laura E ^a   Lleras, Alejandro ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME;

EID: 70349479245     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1241     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.467
2. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
3. Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., & Hollingworth, A. (2009). Novelty is not always the best policy: Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task. Psychological Science, 20, 333-339. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x
4. Drazin, D. H. (1961). Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 43-50. doi:10.1037/h0046860
5. Gibson, B. S., & Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.
6. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431. doi:10.1038/334430a0
7. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00166
8. Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). New York: Academic Press.
9. Lleras, A., Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Rapid resumption of interrupted visual search: New insights on the interaction between vision and memory. Psychological Science, 16, 684-688. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01596.x
10. Lleras, A., Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (2007). Consequences of display changes during interrupted visual search: Rapid resumption is target specific. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 980-993.
11. MacInnes, W. J., & Klein, R. M. (2003). Inhibition of return biases orienting during the search of complex scenes. Scientific World Journal, 3, 75-86. doi:10.1100/tsw.2003.03
12. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
13. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228. doi:10.1080/02643298508252866
15. Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2002). Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1361-1370.
16. Pratt, J., Sekuler, A. B., & McAuliffe, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 8, 33-46. doi:10.1080/13506280042000018
17. Shen, Y. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2006). Interrupted visual searches reveal volatile search memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1208-1220. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1208
18. Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging to continuous visual stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
19. Thomas, L. E., Ambinder, M. S., Hsieh, B., Levinthal, B., Crowell, J. A., Irwin, D. E., et al. (2006). Fruitful visual search: Inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 891-895.
20. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
21. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.478
22. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
23. van Zoest, W., Lleras, A., Kingstone, A., & Enns, J. T. (2007). In sight, out of mind: The role of eye movements in the rapid resumption of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1204-1217.
24. Wolfe, J. M., & Pokorny, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362.
25. Woodrow, H. (1914). The effect upon reaction time of variation in the preparatory interval. In J. Angell, H. Warren, J. Watson, & S. Franz (Eds.), The psychological monographs (pp. 16-65). Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Co.