Semantic processing is affected in inhibition of return: Evidence from an event-related potentials study

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 267-271

  Zhang, Ming ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Event related potential; Inhibition of return; N400; Semantic processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33847209174     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32801231a9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Posner MI, Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG, editors. Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1984. pp. 531-556.
2. Klein RM. Inhibition of return. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4:138-147.
3. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Jha AP, Rosenquist JN. What is inhibited in inhibition of return? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996; 22:367-378.
4. Klein RM, Dick B. Temporal dynamics of reflexive attention shifts: a dualstream rapid serial visual presentation exploration. Psychol Sci 2002; 13:176-179.
5. Taylor TL, Klein RM. On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychol Bull Rev 1998; 5:625-643.
6. Fuentes LJ, Vivas AB, Humphreys GW. Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: effects in semantic priming and flanker interference. Q J Exp Psychol A 1999; 52:149-164.
7. Vivas AB, Fuentes LJ. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychol Bull Rev 2001; 8:315-323.
8. Prime DJ, Ward LM. Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychol Sci 2004; 15:272-276.
9. Wascher E, Tipper SP. Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: an EEG study of inhibition of return. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:716-728.
10. Van der Lubbe RH, Vogel RO, Postma A. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition? J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17:1829-1840.
11. Prime DJ, Ward LM. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Brain Res 2006; 1072:161-174.
12. Luck SJ, Vogel EK, Shapiro KL. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 1996; 383:616-618.
13. Vogel EK, Luck SJ, Shapiro KL. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998; 24:1656-1674.
14. Ceballos NA, Houston RJ, Smith ND, Bauer LO, Taylor RE. N400 as an index of semantic expectancies: differential effects of alcohol and cocaine dependence. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005; 29:936-943.
15. Hinojosa JA, Martin-Loeches M, Rubia FJ. Event-related potentials and semantics: an overview and an integrative proposal. Brain Lang 2001; 78:128-139.
16. Kotchoubey B. Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: a biological approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006; 30:42-65.
17. Van Petten C, Luka BJ. Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain Lang 2006; 97:279-293.
18. Hunt AR, Kingstone A. Inhibition of return: dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2003; 29:1068-1074.
19. Sumner P, Nachev P, Vora N, Husain M, Kennard C. Distinct cortical and collicular mechanisms of inhibition of return revealed with S cone stimuli. Curr Biol 2004; 14:2259-2263.