Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1937-1946

  Chen, Qi ^a   Wei, Ping ^a   Zhou, Xiaolin ^a,b,c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CAPITAL NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFLICT; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOMOTOR SYSTEM; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33750540150     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1937     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alivisatos, B. (1992). The role of the frontal cortex in the use of advance information in a mental rotation paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 30, 145-159.
2. Alivisatos, B., & Milner, B. (1989). Effects of frontal or temporal lobectomy on the use of advance information in a choice reaction time task. Neuropsychologia, 27, 495-503.
3. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2004). Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms. Neuron, 41, 473-487.
4. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., et al. (2000). fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 988-1000.
5. Boettiger, C. A., & D'Esposito, M. (2005). Frontal networks for learning and executing arbitrary stimulus-response associations. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 2723-2732.
6. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
7. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior angulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
8. Bunge, S. A., Hazeltine, E., Scanlon, M. D., Rosen, A. C., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. Neuroimage, 17, 1562-1571.
9. Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215-222.
10. Critchley, H. D., Tang, J., Glaser, D., Butterworth, B., & Dolan, J. (2005). Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response. Neuroimage, 27, 885-895.
11. de Zubicaray, G. I., Wilson, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & Muthiah, S. (2001). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 218-227.
12. Dreher, J. C., & Grafman, J. (2003). Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 329-339.
13. Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D.W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
14. Fellows, L. K., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain, 128, 788-796.
15. Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., & Zilles, K. (2001). The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: An fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage, 14, S59-S67.
16. Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J.-P., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1995). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 189-210.
17. Fuentes, L. J., Boucart, M., Vivas, A. B., Alvarez, R., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: Evidence form the Stroop task. Neuropsychology, 14, 134-140.
18. Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and f lanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 149-164.
19. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., Murphy, K., Roche, R. A., & Stein, E. A. (2002). Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction. Neuroimage, 17, 1820-1829.
20. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 96, 8301-8306.
21. Halsband, U., & Freund, H.-J. (1990). Premotor cortex and conditional motor learning in man. Brain, 113, 207-222.
22. Kelly, A. M., Hester, R., Murphy, K., Javitt, D. C., Foxe, J. J., & Garavan, H. (2004). Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3105-3112.
23. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
24. Kiehl, K. A., Liddle, P. F., & Hopfinger, J. B. (2000). Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: An event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology, 37, 216-223.
25. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
26. Koechlin, E., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003). The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science, 302, 1181-1185.
27. Koski, L. M., Paus, T., & Petrides, M. (1998). Directed attention after unilateral frontal excisions in humans. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1363-1371.
28. Lepsien, J., & Pollmann, S. (2002). Covert reorienting and inhibition of return: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 127-144.
29. Liddle, P. F., Kiehl, K. A., & Smith, A. M. (2001). Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 100-109.
30. MacDonald, A. W., 3rd, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
31. Mayer, A. R., Seidenberg, M., Dorflinger, J. M., & Rao, S. M. (2004). An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: Supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1262-1271.
32. Milham, M. P., & Banich, M. T. (2005). Anterior cingulate cortex: An fMRI analysis of conflict specificity and functional differentiation. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 328-335.
33. Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Claus, E. D., & Cohen, N. J. (2003). Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control. Neuroimage, 18, 483-493.
34. Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N. J., Wszalek, T., et al. (2001). The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 467-473.
35. Murray, E. A., Bussey, T. J., & Wise, S. P. (2000). Role of prefrontal cortex in a network for arbitrary visuomotor mapping. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 114 -129.
36. Paus, T. (2001). Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nature Review Neuroscience, 2, 417-424.
37. Paus, T., Petrides, M., Evans, A. C., & Meyer, E. (1993). Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: A positron emission tomography study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 98, 676-682.
38. Petrides, M. (1982). Motor conditional associative-learning after selective prefrontal lesions in the monkey. Behavioral Brain Research, 5, 4107-4413.
39. Pol, H. E. H., Baaré, W. F. C., Gispen-de Wied, C. C., Mali, W. P. Th. M., & Kahn, R. S. (1995). Magnetic resonance imaging of the frontal lobe in schizophrenia. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 5, 239.
40. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443-447.
42. Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P. A., & D'Esposito, M. (2003). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1111-1121.
43. Shenton, M. E., Dickey, C. C., Frumin, M., & Robert, W. M. (2001). A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 49, 1-52.
44. Small, D. M., Gitelman, D. R., Gregory, M. D., Nobre, A. C., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M.-M. (2003). The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention. Neuroimage, 18, 633-641.
45. Swick, D., & Jovanovic, J. (2002). Anterior cingulate cortex and the Stroop task: Neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1240-1253.
46. Sylvester, C. Y., Wager, T. D., Lacey, S. C., Hernandez, L., Nichols, T. E., Smith, E. E., et al. (2003). Switching attention and resolving interference: fMRI measures of executive functions. Neuropsychologia, 41, 357-370.
47. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.
48. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25, 55-71.
49. Tassinari, G., Biscaldi, M., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1989). Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam), 70, 267-291.
50. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
51. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639-1656.
52. van Veen, V, & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497-504.
53. van Veen, V., Cohen, J. D., Botvinick, M. M., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing. Neuroimage, 21, 1302-1308.
54. Vivas, A. B., & Fuentes, L. J. (2001). Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 315-323.
55. Weissman, D. H., Giesbrecht, B., Song, A. W., Mangun, G. R., & Woldorff, M. G. (2003). Conflict monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex during selective attention to global and local object features. Neuroimage, 19, 1361-1368.
56. Zysset, S., Muller, K., Lohmann, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Color-word matching stroop task: Separating interference and response conflict. Neuroimage, 13, 29-36.