Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine

European Spine Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1648-1659

  Barrey, Cédric ^a,b,c,e   Champain, Sabina ^c   Campana, Sophie ^c   Ramadan, Aymen ^d   Perrin, Gilles ^a,b   Skalli, Wafa ^c  

^a HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^d Clinique Beausoleil   (Switzerland)

^e NONE   (France)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Biomechanics; Cervical disc prosthesis; Cervical spine; Kinematics; Mobility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KINEMATICS; LORDOSIS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; ROTATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84864993497     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2180-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K (1999) Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24:670-675
2. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519-528
3. Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Nakamura H, Kimura T (2004) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 4:624-628
4. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B et al (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:79-85
5. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431-2434
6. Wigfield CC, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A, Adams MA (2003) Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs. The influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:441-449
7. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30:1165-1172
8. Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7:33-39
9. Barrey C, Campana S, Persohn S, Perrin G, Skalli W (2011) Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J (Epub ahead of print)
10. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Brayda-Bruno M, Fornari M (2008) Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review. Clin Biomech 23:1095-1104
11. Porchet F, Metcalf N (2004) Clinical outcomes with the prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17:E6
12. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N (2005) Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30:1949-1954
13. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:109-198
14. Rabin D, Pickett GE, Bisnaire L, Duggal N (2007) The kinematics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: a pilot study. Neurosurg 61:ONS100-ONS105
15. Ramadan AS, Mitulescu A, Schmitt (2007) Total disc replacement with the Discocerv™ (Cervidisc Evolution) cervical prosthesis: early results of a second generation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:513-520
16. Sasso RC, Best NM (2008) Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:19-22
17. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ et al (2009) Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 34:101-107
18. Rousseau MA, Cottin P, Levante S, Nogier A, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2008) In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-andsocket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane. Cranial versus caudal geometric center. Spine 33:E6-E9
19. Powell JW, Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA, Hipp JA (2010) Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty. Computer-aided radiographic analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:89-95
20. Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, Mazel C, DeGuise J, Skalli W (2006) Validation of new clinical quantitative software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 15:982-991
21. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial with 24 month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:481-491
22. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275-286
23. ®) with up to 2 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:841-850
24. Anakwenze OA, Auerbach JD, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA (2009) Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine 34:2001-2007
25. Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambron HO, Pashman R, Regan JJ, Anand N, Bray R (2004) Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 17:E4
26. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, Hurlbert RJ (2006) Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 6:233-241
27. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N (2006) Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:98-105
28. Kim SK, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC (2008) Effetcs of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17:20-29
29. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
30. Amevo B, Worth D, Bogduk N (1991) Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: a study in normal volunteers. Clin Biomech 6:111-117
31. Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Novotny J, Antinnes J (1991) In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res 9:828-834
32. Holmes A, Wang C, Han ZH, Dang GT (1994) The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Spine 19:2505-2510
33. Watier B (1997) Etude expérimentale du rachis cervical: comportement mécanique in vitro et cinématique in vivo (thesis in French). Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, Paris
34. Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15:633-648
35. Barrey C, Mosnier T, Jund J, Perrin G, Skalli W (2009) In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. J Neurosurg Spine 11:538-546
36. Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, Voronov LI, Rinella A, Dooris A et al (2007) Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Spine 32:2965-2969
37. Rousseau MA, Laporte S, Chavary-Bernier E, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2007) Reproducibility of measuring the shape and threedimensional position of cervical vertebrae in upright position using the EOS stereoradiography system. Spine 32:2569-2572