Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty

Spine Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-241

  Fong, Shee Yan ^a   DuPlessis, Stephan J ^a   Casha, Steven ^a   Hurlbert, R John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cervical spine; Degenerative disc disease; Disc replacement; Lordosis; Motion preservation; Sagittal alignment; Sagittal balance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY POSITION; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CERVICOBRACHIAL NEURALGIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; NERVE ENDING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VERTEBRA BODY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KYPHOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL CORD DISEASES;

EID: 33646074015     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bohlman H.H., Emery S.E., Goodfellow D.B., et al. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy: long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 (1993) 1298-1307
2. Matsunaga S., Kabayama S., Yamamoto T., et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24 (1999) 670-675
3. Eck J.C., Humphreys S.C., Lim T.H., et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27 (2002) 2431-2434
4. Wigfield C., Gill S., Nelson R., et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg (Spine) 96 (2002) 17-21
5. Bryan V.E. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl. 2 (2002) S92-S97
6. Goffin J., Casey A., Kehr P., et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurg 51 (2002) 840-845
7. Goffin J., Van Calenbergh F., van Loon J., et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28 (2003) 2673-2678
8. Pickett G.E., and Duggal N. Artificial disc insertion following anterior cervical discectomy. Can J Neurol Sci 30 (2003) 278-283
9. Anderson P.A., Sasso R.C., Rouleau J.P., Carlson C.S., and Goffin J. The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 4 6 Suppl. (2004) S303-S309
10. Pickett G.E., Mitsis D.K., Sekhon L.H., et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 17 (2004) E5 30-5
11. Johnson J.P., Lauryssen C., Cambron H.O., et al. Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 17 (2004) E14 1-4
12. Harrison D.E., Harrison D.D., Cailliet R., et al. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis?. Spine 25 (2000) 2072-2078
13. Savolainen S., Rinne J., and Hernesniemi J. A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery 43 (1998) 51-55