Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C ®) with up to 2 years of follow-up

European Spine Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 841-850

  Beaurain, J ^a   Bernard, P ^b   Dufour, T ^c   Fuentes, J M ^d   Hovorka, I ^e   Huppert, J ^f   Steib, J P ^g   Vital, J M ^h   Aubourg, L ⁱ   Vila, T ⁱ  

^a DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Centre Aquitain du Dos   (France)

^c University Hospital   (France)

^d Clinique du Millenaire   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NICE   (France)

^f CLINIQUE DU PARC   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

^h University Hospital   (France)

ⁱ LDR Medical   (France)

Author keywords

Adjacent level degeneration; Cervical total disc replacement; Clinical study; Degenerative disc disease; Motion; Ossification

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CERVICAL TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SECOND LOOK SURGERY; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL PAIN; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WORK RESUMPTION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; OSSIFICATION, HETEROTOPIC; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SPONDYLOSIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649134947     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. P Anderson RC Sasso KD Riew 2007 Update on cervical artificial disk replacement Instr Course Lect 56 237 245
2. H Baba N Furusawa S Imura N Kawahara H Tsuchiya K Tomita 1993 Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy Spine 18 2167 2173 (Pubitemid 23336048)
3. Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM (2008) Mobi-C. In : Yue JJ, Bertagnoli R, McAfee P, An HS (eds) Motion preservation surgery of the spine: advanced techniques and controversies. Part III, Chap 27, Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 231-237
4. Bernard P, Vital JM, Dufour T, Beaurain J, Fuentes JM, Huppert J, Hovorka I (2006) A new cervical disc prosthesis: Mobi-C. Preliminary results of a prospective study. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Le Huec JC, Brayda-Bruno M (eds) Non-fusion technologies in spine surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp 253-260
5. R Bertagnoli J Yue F Pfeiffer A Fenk-Mare J Lawrence T Kershaw R Nanieva 2005 Early results after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement J Neurosurg Spine 2 403 410
6. V Bryan 2002 Cervical motion segment replacement Eur Spine J 11 S92 S97 10.1007/s00586-002-0389-7
7. BH Cummins JT Robertson SS Gill 1998 Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint J Neurosurg 88 6 943 948 (Pubitemid 28261837)
8. A Cappuccino F Bellera 2004 Clinical experience with the new PCM (Cervitech) Disc Spine J 4 315S 321S 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.024
9. P Cote JD Cassidy K Yong-Hing J Sibley J Loewy 1997 Apophysial joint degeneration, disc degeneration, and sagittal curve of the cervical spine. Can they be measured reliably on radiographs? Spine 22 859 864 10.1097/00007632- 199704150-00007
10. A Dmitriev B Cunningham H Nianbin G Sell F Vigna P McAfee 2005 Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model Spine 30 1165 1172 10.1097/01.brs.0000162441.23824.95
11. N Duggal G Pickett D Mitsis J Keller 2004 Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty Neurosurg Focus 17 E9 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.9
12. JC Eck SC Humphreys TH Lim ST Jeong JG Kim SD Hodges HS An 2002 Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion Spine 27 2431 2434 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003
13. R Fijn RT Koorevaar JR Brouwers 2003 Prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement with NSAIDs Pharm World Sci 25 138 145 10.1023/A:1024830213832
14. M Fransen B Neal 2004 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for preventing heterotopic bone formation after hip arthroplasty Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 CD001160
15. J Goffin A Casey P Kehr K Liebig B Lind C Logroscino V Pointillart F Van Calenbergh J van Loon 2002 Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis Neurosurgery 51 840 845 10.1097/00006123-200209000- 00048
16. J Goffin F Van Calenbergh J Von Loon A Casey P Kehr K Liebig B Lind C Logroscino R Sgrambiglia V Pointillart 2003 Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level Spine 28 2673 2678 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA
17. D Gore S Sepic G Gardner 1986 Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people Spine 11 521 524 10.1097/00007632-198607000-00003 (Pubitemid 16002968)
18. JS Harrop JA Youssef M Maltenfort P Vorwald P Jabbour CM Bono N Goldfarb AR Vaccaro AS Hilibrand 2008 Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty Spine 33 1701 1707
19. AS Hilibrand GD Carlson MA Palumbo PK Jones HH Bohlman 1999 Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 519 528 (Pubitemid 29211592)
20. AS Hilibrand M Robbins 2004 Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4 190S 194S 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007
21. A Kettler H-J Wilke 2006 Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration Eur Spine J 15 705 718 10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y
22. SH Kim HC Shin DA Shin KN Kim DH Yoon 2007 Early clinical experience with the Mobi-C disc prosthesis Yonsei Med J 48 457 464 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.457
23. PC McAfee BW Cunningham A Dmitriev N Hu KS Woo A Cappuccino L Pimenta 2003 Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament Spine 28 S176 S185 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092219.28382.0C
24. PC McAfee BW Cunningham J Devine E Williams J Yu-Yahiro 2003 Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement J Spinal Disord Tech 16 384 389
25. C Mehren P Suchomel F Grochulla P Barsa P Sourkova J Hradil A Korge HM Mayer 2006 Heterotopic Ossification in Total Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Spine 31 2802 2806 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5
26. PV Mummaneni JK Burkus RW Haid VC Traynelis TA Zdeblick 2007 Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial J Neurosurg Spine 6 198 209 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198
27. A Nabhan F Ahlhelm T Pitzen WI Steudel J Jung K Shariat O Steimer F Bachelier D Pape 2007 Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study Eur Spine J 16 423 430 10.1007/s00586-006-0226-5
28. A Nabhan F Ahlhelm K Shariat T Pitzen O Steimer WI Steudel D Pape 2007 The ProDisc-C prothesis clinical and radiological experience 1 year after surgery Spine 32 1935 1941 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31813162d8
29. ®-cage J Korean Neurosurg Soc 44 217 221 10.3340/jkns.2008.44.4.217
30. MF Phillips SR Garfin 2005 Cervical disc replacement Spine 30 S27 S33 10.1097/01.brs.0000175192.55139.69
31. GE Pickett LH Sekhon WR Sears N Duggal 2006 Complications with cervical arthroplasty J Neurosurg Spine 4 98 105 10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.98
32. F Porchet N Metcalf 2004 Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II Cervical Disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial Neurosurg Focus 17 E6 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.6
33. CM Puttlitz MA Rousseau Z Xu S Hu BK Tay JC Lotz 2004 Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics Spine 29 2809 2814 10.1097/01.brs.0000147739.42354.a9
34. JT Robertson SM Papadopoulos VC Traneylis 2005 Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study J Neurosurg Spine 3 417 423
35. JT Robertson NH Metcalf 2004 Long-term outcome after implantation of the Prestige I disc in an end-stage indication: 4 year results from a pilot study Neurosurg Focus 17 E10 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.10
36. RC Sasso NM Best 2008 Cervical Kinematics after fusion and Bryan Disc Arthroplasty J Spinal Disord Tech 21 19 22 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778
37. L Sekhon 2004 Cervical arthroplasty in the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results Neurosurg Focus 17 3 E8 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.8
38. S Sola R Hebecker M Knoop S Mann 2005 Bryan cervical disc prosthesis-three years follow-up Eur Spine J 14 Suppl 1 38
39. JM Vital V Pointillart O Gille N Aurouer 2007 Les prothèses cervicales constituent-elles un réel progrès dans la pathologie dégénérative? e-mémoires de l'Académie Nationale de Chirurgie 6 3 45 50
40. C Wigfield S Gill R Nelson N Metcalf J Robertson 2002 The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study Spine 27 2446 2452 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00006
41. C Wigfield S Gill R Nelson I Langdon N Metcalf J Robertson 2002 Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease J Neurosurg 96 Suppl 1 17 21 (Pubitemid 34226534)