Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 19-22

  Sasso, Rick C ^a   Best, Natalie M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Artificial disc; Bryan artificial disc replacement; Cervical spine; Fusion; Kinematics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLOGRAFT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE PLATE; BRYAN DISC DEVICE; CERVICAL SPINE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PLATE FIXATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; VERTEBRA BODY; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMPLANTATION; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNAL FIXATOR; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PLATES; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERNAL FIXATORS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 45149104115     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, et al. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1298-1307.
2. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:519-528.
3. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004; 17:79-85.
4. Goffin J, Van LJ, Van CF, et al. Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 1995; 8:500-508.
5. Kulkarni V, Rajshekhar V, Raghuram L. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;100:2-6.
6. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431-2434.
7. Fuller DA, Kirkpatrick JS, Emery SE, et al. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine. 1998;23:1649-1656.
8. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine. 1999;24:670-675.
9. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:17-21.
10. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, et al. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2003;28:134-139.
11. St John TA, Vaccaro AR, Sah AP, et al. Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting. Am J Orthop. 2003;32:18-23.
12. Fernstrom U. Arthroplasty with intercorporeal endoprosthesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1966; 357:154-159.
13. Cummins BH, Robertson JT, Gill SS. Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:943-948.
14. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, et al. The Bryan cervical disc: wear properties and early clinical results. The Spine J. 2004;4: 303S-309S.
15. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurg. 2002;51:840-847.
16. DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT, Morrow BR, et al. In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E7.
17. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:314-323.
18. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine. 2005;30:1949-1954.
19. Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, et al. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:62-68.
20. Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, et al. Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine. 2004;29:E221-E226.
21. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, et al. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine. 2002; 27:2446-2452.
22. Goffin J, Van CF, Van LJ, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: Single-level and bi-level. Spine. 2003;28:2673-2678.