Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: Computer-aided radiographic analysis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 89-95

  Powell, John William ^a   Sasso, Rick C ^a   Metcalf, Newton H ^b   Anderson, Paul A ^c   Hipp, John A ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment; Bryan disk; Cervical disk arthroplasty; Computer analysis; Motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CENTER OF ROTATION; CERVICAL DISK ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICULOPATHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERNAL FIXATORS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; JOINT INSTABILITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RADIOLOGY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77951038930     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181991413     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop. 1999;28:336-340.
2. Fuller DA, Kirkpatrick JS, Emery SE, et al. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine. 1998;23:1649-1656.
3. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:481-491.
4. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, et al. The Bryan cervical disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J. 2004;4: 303S-309S.
5. Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, et al. Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine. 2004;29:E221-E226.
6. Sasso RC, Sears WR, McCombe PF. Cervical motion in arthroplasty and arthrodesis: evaluation with digital image analysis. Roundtables Spine Surg Recent Adv Cervical Arthroplasty. 2007;2: 35-43.
7. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:314-323.
8. Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, et al. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;9:27-38.
9. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine. 2005;30:1949-1954.
10. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431-2434.
11. Wigfield CC, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A, et al. Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:44-49.
12. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg Spine. 2002;96: 17-21.
13. Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech. 2000;15:633-648.
14. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Grob D, et al. Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine. 1993;18:120-127.
15. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Novotny JE, et al. In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:828-834.