The kinematics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: A pilot study

Neurosurgery

Volumn 61, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Rabin, Doron ^a   Pickett, Gwynedd E ^a   Bisnaire, Lynn ^a   Duggal, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cervical arthrodesis; Cervical arthroplasty; Spondylosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEIGHT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KINEMATICS; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE MOBILITY; STUDENT T TEST; SURGICAL PATIENT; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL OSTEOPHYTOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548666445     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000289722.12459.9e     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Toth JM, Riew KD: A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:202-210, 2004.
2. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, Carlson CS, Goffin J: The Bryan Cervical Disc: Wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 4:303S-309S, 2004.
3. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K: Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 18:2167-2173, 1993.
4. Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Keller JL: Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus 17:E9, 2004.
5. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS: Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431-2434, 2002.
6. Emery SE, Bohlman HH, Bolesta MJ, Jones PK: Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:941-951, 1998.
7. Geisler FH, Caspar W, Pitzen T, Johnson TA: Reoperation in patients after anterior cervical plate stabilization in degenerative disease. Spine 23:911-920, 1998.
8. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Poinillart V, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J: Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51:840-845, 2002.
9. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh V, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Sgrambiglia R, Pointillart V: Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-level and bi-level. Spine 28:2673-2678, 2003.
10. Gore DR, Gardner GM, Sepic SB, Murray MP: Roentgenographic findings following anterior cervical fusion. Skeletal Radiol 15:556-559, 1986.
11. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo M, Jones PK, Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519-528, 1999.
12. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K: Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24:670-675, 1999.
13. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L: Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: A comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 28:S176-185, 2003.
14. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N: Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 17:E5, 2004.
15. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N: Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30:1949-1954, 2005.
16. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N: Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:98-105, 2006.
17. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Bellera FP, Link HD: Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J 4:315S-321S, 2004.
18. Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI: Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: A prospective study. Spine 29:E221-E226, 2004.
19. Robertson JT, Papadopoulou SM, Traynelis VC: Assessment of adjacent segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: A prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 3:417-423, 2005.
20. Takeshima T, Omokawa S, Takaoka T, Araki M, Ueda Y, Takakura Y: Sagittal alignment of cervical flexion and extension: Lateral radiograph analysis. Spine 27: E348-E355, 2002.
21. Traynelis VC: The Prestige cervical disc replacement. Spine J 4:S310-S314, 2004.
22. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, Langdon I, Metcalf N, Robertson J: Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 96 [Suppl 1]:17-21, 2002.
23. Yonenobu K, Okada K, Fuji T, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K: Causes of neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine 11:818-823, 1986.