Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: A systematic review

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 184, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Akl, Elie A ^a,b   Meerpohl, Joerg J ^d   Raad, Dany ^a   Piaggio, Giulia ^c   Mattioni, Manlio ^c   Paggi, Marco G ^c   Gurtner, Aymone ^c   Mattarocci, Stefano ^c   Tahir, Rizwan ^a   Muti, Paola ^b,c   Schünemann, Holger J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c REGINA ELENA NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EMBASE; FACULTY PRACTICE; FULL TEXT DATABASE; FUNDING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCINFO; PUBLICATION; REIMBURSEMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TEACHING; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WORKMAN COMPENSATION;

EID: 84864828134     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111123     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abouleish AE. Productivity-based compensations versus incentive plans. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1765-7.
2. Ashar B, Levine R, Magaziner J, et al. An association between paying physician-teachers for their teaching efforts and an improved educational experience for learners. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22:1393-7. (Pubitemid 47476696)
3. Garson A Jr, Strifert KE, Beck JR, et al. The metrics process: Baylor's development of a "report card" for faculty and departments. Acad Med 1999;74:861-70. (Pubitemid 29387682)
4. Santilli SM. Current issues facing academic surgery departments: stakeholders' views. Acad Med 2008;83:66-73.
5. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:383-94.
6. Cramer JS, Ramalingam S, Rosenthal TC, et al. Implementing a comprehensive relative-value-based incentive plan in an academic family medicine department. Acad Med 2000;75:1159-66. (Pubitemid 32038186)
7. Sussman AJ, Fairchild DG, Coblyn J, et al. Primary care compensation at an academic medical center: a model for the mixed-payer environment. Acad Med 2001;76:693-9. (Pubitemid 32642711)
8. Andreae MC, Freed GL. Using a productivity-based physician compensation program at an academic health center: a case study. Acad Med 2002;77:894-9. (Pubitemid 35034044)
9. Tarquinio GT, Dittus RS, Byrne DW, et al. Effects of performance-based compensation and faculty track on the clinical activity, research portfolio, and teaching mission of a large academic department of medicine. Acad Med 2003;78:690-701. (Pubitemid 36896132)
10. Miller RD, Cohen NH. The impact of productivity-based incentives on faculty salary-based compensation. Anesth Analg 2005;101:195-9. (Pubitemid 40853375)
11. Reich DL, Galati M, Krol M, et al. A mission-based productivity compensation model for an academic anesthesiology department. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1981-8.
12. Schweitzer L, Eells TD. Post-tenure review at the University of Louisville School of Medicine: a faculty development and revitalization tool. Acad Med 2007;82:713-7. (Pubitemid 47013358)
13. Schweitzer L, Sessler DI, Martin NC. The challenge for excellence at the University of Louisville: implementation and outcomes of research resource investments between 1996 and 2006. Acad Med 2008;83:560-7.
14. Medical Group Management Association. Physician compensation and production survey report: 1998 report based on 1997 data. Englewood (CO): The Association; 1998.
15. Feiner JR, Miller RD, Hickey RF. Productivity versus availability as a measure of faculty clinical responsibility. Anesth Analg 2001;93:313-8. (Pubitemid 32701521)
16. Hilton C, Fisher W, Lopez A, et al. A relative-value-based system for calculating faculty productivity in teaching, research, administration, and patient care. Acad Med 1997;72:787-93. (Pubitemid 27407252)
17. Bardes CL, Hayes JG. Are the teachers teaching? Measuring the educational activities of clinical faculty. Acad Med 1995;70:111-4.
18. Lubarsky DA. Incentivize everything, incentivize nothing [editorial]. Anesth Analg 2005;100:490-2. (Pubitemid 40170548)
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.