Structural homology in the Solanaceae: Analysis of genomic regions in support of synteny studies in tomato, potato and pepper

Plant Journal

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 602-614

  Peters, Sander A ^a   Bargsten, Joachim W ^a,b   Szinay, Dõra ^a   Van De Belt, José ^a   Visser, Richard G F ^a   Bai, Yuling ^a   De Jong, Hans ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS BIOINFORMATICS CENTRE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

chromosome evolution; chromosome rearrangement; comparative sequence analysis; fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); orthology; transposon

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME EVOLUTION; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; COMPARATIVE SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; ORTHOLOGY; TRANSPOSON;

FISH; FRUITS;

GENES;

ARTICLE; DISEASE RESISTANCE; EUCHROMATIN; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PEPPER; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; POTATO; RETROPOSON; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SOLANACEAE; TOMATO;

CAPSICUM; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; DISEASE RESISTANCE; EUCHROMATIN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME, PLANT; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; RETROELEMENTS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84864616296     PISSN: 09607412     EISSN: 1365313X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05012.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Albrecht, E., and, Chetelat, R.T., (2009) Comparative genetic linkage map of Solanum sect. Juglandifolia: evidence of chromosomal rearrangements and overall synteny with tomatoes and related nightshades. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118, 831-847.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and, Lipman, D.J., (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
3. Anderson, L.K., Covey, P.A., Larsen, L.R., and, Stack, S.M., (2010) Structural differences in chromosomes distinguish species in the tomato clade. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 29, 24-34.
4. Ashrafi, H., Kinkade, M., and, Foolad, M.R., (2009) A new genetic linkage map of tomato based on a Solanum lycopersicum x S. pimpinellifolium RIL population displaying locations of candidate pathogen response genes. Genome, 52, 935-956.
5. Bai, Y., and, Lindhout, P., (2007) Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann. Bot. 100, 1085-1094.
6. Bai, Y., van der Hulster, R., Huang, C.C., Wei, L., Stam, P., and, Lindhout, P., (2004) Mapping Ol-4, a gene conferring resistance to Oidium neolycopersici and originating from Lycopersicon peruvianum LA2172, requires multi-allelic, single-locus markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1215-1223.
7. Bedinger, P.A., Chetelat, R.T., McClure, B., et al. (2010) Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation. Sex. Plant Reprod. 24, 171-187.
8. Bennetzen, J.L., (2000a) Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes: microcolinearity and its many exceptions. Plant Cell, 12, 1021-1029.
9. Bennetzen, J.L., (2000b) Transposable element contributions to plant gene and genome evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 251-269.
10. Bonierbale, M.W., Plaisted, R., and, Tanksley, S.D., (1988) RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics, 120, 1095-1103.
11. Budiman, M.A., Chang, S.-B., Lee, S., Yang, T.J., Zhang, H.-B., de Jong, H., and, Wing, R.A., (2004) Localization of jointless-2 gene in the centromeric region of tomato chromosome 12 based on high resolution genetic and physical mapping. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 190-196.
12. Burge, C., and, Karlin, S., (1997) Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 78-94.
13. Chang, S.-B., Yang, T.-J., Datema, E., et al. (2008) FISH mapping and molecular organization of the major repetitive sequences of tomato. Chromosome Res. 16, 919-933.
14. Chetelat, R.T., and, Ji, Y., (2007) Cytogenetics and evolution. In Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops (, Razdan, M.K., and, Mattoo, A.K., eds). Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, pp. 77-112.
15. Chetelat, R.T., Cisneros, P., Stamova, L., and, Rick, C.M., (1997) A male-fertile Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides hybrid enables direct backcrossing to tomato at the diploid level. Euphytica, 95, 99-108.
16. Coghlan, A., Eichler, E.E., Oliver, S.G., Paterson, A.H., and, Stein, L., (2005) Chromosome evolution in eukaryotes: a multi-kingdom perspective. Trends Genet. 21, 673-682.
17. Datema, E., Mueller, L.A., Buels, R., Giovannoni, J.J., Visser, R.G.F., Stiekema, W.J., and, Van Ham, R.C.H.J., (2008) Comparative BAC end sequence analysis of potato and tomato reveals overrepresentation of specific gene families in potato. BMC Plant Biol. 8, 34.
18. De Jong, J.H., Wolters, A.M.A., Kok, J.M., Verhaar, H., and, Van Eden, J., (1993) Chromosome pairing and potential for intergeneric recombination in some hypotetraploid somatic hybrids of Lycopersicum esculentum (+) Solanum tuberosum. Genome, 36, 1032-1041.
19. De Jong, J.H., Zhong, X.-B., Fransz, P.F., Wennekes-van Eden, J., Jacobsen, E., and, Zabel, P., (2000) High resolution FISH reveals the molecular and chromosomal organisation of repetitive sequences of individual tomato chromosomes. In Chromosomes Today, volume 13 (, Olmo, E., and, Redi, C.A., eds). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 267-275.
20. Doganlar, S., Frary, A., Daunay, M. -C., Lester, R.N., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2002a) Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics, 161, 1713-1726.
21. Doganlar, S., Frary, A., Daunay, M. -C., Lester, R.N., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2002b) A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 161, 1697-1711.
22. Ehrlich, J., Sankoff, D., and, Nadeau, J.H., (1997) Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution. Genetics, 147, 289-296.
23. Foolad, M.R., (2007) Current status of breeding tomatoes for salt and drought tolerance. In Advances in Molecular Breeding toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops (, Jenks, M.A., Hasegawa, P.M., and, Jain, S.M., eds). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 669-700.
24. Fulton, T.M., Nelson, J.C., and, Tanksley, S.D., (1997) Introgression and DNA marker analysis of Lycopersicum peruvianum, a wild relative of the cultivated tomato, into Lycopersicum esculentum, followed through three successive backcross generations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 895-902.
25. Fulton, T.M.R., van der Hoeven, R., Eannetta, N.T., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2002) Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell, 14, 1457-1467.
26. Ganal, M.W., Lapitan, N.L.V., and, Tanksley, S.D., (1991) Macrostructure of the tomato telomeres. Plant Cell, 3, 87-94.
27. Gaut, B.S., Wright, S.I., Rizzon, C., Dvorak, J., and, Anderson, L.K., (2007) Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes. Nature, 8, 77-84.
28. Grandillo, S., Ku, H.M., and, Tanksley, S.D., (1999) Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 978-987.
29. Gray, Y.H.M., (2000) It takes two transposons to tango. Trends Genet. 16, 461-468.
30. Grube, R.C., Radwanskii, E.R., and, Jahn, M., (2000) Comparative genetics of disease resistance within the Solanaceae. Genetics, 155, 873-887.
31. Hoffman, A.A., Sgrò, C.M., and, Weeks, A.R., (2004) Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms and adaption. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 482-488.
32. Huang, J.T., and, Dooner, H.K., (2008) Macrotransposition and other complex chromosomal restructuring in maize by closely linked transposons in direct orientation. Plant Cell, 20, 2019-2031.
33. Iovene, M., Grzebelus, E., Carputo, D., Jiang, J., and, Simon, P.W., (2008) Major cytogenetic landmarks and karyotype analysis in Daucus carota and other Apiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 95, 793-804.
34. Jahn, M., Paran, I., Hoffmann, K., Radwanski, E.R., Livingstone, K.D., Grube, R.C., Aftergoot, E., Lapidot, M., and, Moyer, J., (2000) Genetic mapping of the Tsw locus for resistance to the Tospovirus Tomato spotted wilt virus in Capsicum spp. and its relationship to the Sw-5 gene for resistance to the same pathogen in tomato. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 13, 673-682.
35. Jenks, M.A., Hasegawa, P.M., and, Jain, S.M., (2007) Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
36. Jurka, J., Kapitonov, V.V., Pavlicek, A., Klonowski, P., Kohany, O., and, Walichiewicz, J., (2005) Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462-467.
37. Knapp, S., (2002) Tobacco to tomatoes: a phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2001-2022.
38. Koo, D. -H., Jo, S. -H., Park, H. -M., Lee, S., and, Choi, D., (2008) Integration of cytogenetic and genetic linkage maps unveils the physical architecture of tomato chromosome 2. Genetics, 179, 1211-1220.
39. Ku, H. -M., Vision, T., Liu, J., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2000) Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9121-9126.
40. Liharska, T.B., Koornneef, M., Van Wordragen, M., Van Kammen, A., and, Zabel, P., (1996) Tomato chromosome 6: effect of alien chromosomal segments on recombinant frequencies. Genome, 39, 485-491.
41. Livingstone, K., and, Rieseberg, L., (2004) Chromosomal evolution and speciation: a recombination-based approach. New Phytol. 161, 107-112.
42. Livingstone, K.D., Lackney, V.K., Blauth, J.R., van Wijk, R., and, Jahn, M.K., (1999) Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 152, 1183-1202.
43. Lysak, M.A., Berr, A., Pacinka, A., Schmidt, R., McBreen, K., and, Schubert, I., (2006) Mechanisms of chromosome reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 5224-5229.
44. Moyle, L.C., (2008) Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution, 62, 2995-3013.
45. Moyle, L.C., and, Graham, E. B., (2006) Genome-wide associations between hybrid sterility QTL and marker transmission ratio distortion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 973-980.
46. Noor, M.A.F., Grams, K.L., Bertucci, L.A., and, Reiland, J., (2001) Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 12084-12088.
47. Pan, X., Stein, L., and, Brendel, V., (2005) SynBrowse: a synteny browser for comparative sequence analysis. Bioinformatics, 21, 17.
48. Passarge, E., Horsthemke, B., and, Farber, R.A., (1999) Incorrect use of the term synteny. Nat. Genet. 23, 387.
49. Pertuzé, R.A., Ji, Y., and, Chetelat, R.T., (2002) Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato. Genome, 45, 1003-1012.
50. Peters, S.A., Datema, E., Szinay, D., et al. (2009) Solanum lycopersicum cv. Heinz 1706 chromosome 6: distribution and abundance of genes and retrotransposable elements. Plant J. 58, 857-869.
51. Pevzner, P., and, Tesler, G., (2003) Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes. Genome Res. 13, 37-45.
52. Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2011) Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature, 475, 189-197.
53. Remm, M., Storm, C.E.V., and, Sonnhammer, E.L.L., (2001) Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041-1052.
54. Rick, C.M., DeVerna, J.W., Chetelat, R.T., and, Stevens, M.A., (1987) Potential contributions of wide crosses to improvement of processing tomatoes. Acta Hortic. 200, 45-55.
55. Rieseberg, L.H., and, Willis, J.H., (2007) Plant speciation. Science, 317, 910-914.
56. Seah, S.J., Rossi, Y.M., Gleason, C.A., and, Williamson, V.M., (2004) The nematode-resistance gene, Mi-1, is associated with an inverted chromosomal segment in susceptible compared to resistant tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 1635-1642.
57. Sesso, H.D., Liu, S., Gaziano, J.M., and, Buring, J.E., (2003) Dietry lycopene, tomato-based food products and cardiovascular disease in woman. J. Nutr. 133, 2336-2341.
58. Singh, R.J., (2007) Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering, and Crop Improvement: Vegetable Crops Volume 3. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.
59. Spooner, D.M., Anderson, G.J., and, Jansen, R.K., (1993) Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 676-688.
60. Spooner, D.M., Peralta, I.E., and, Knapp, S., (2005) Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon, 54, 43-61.
61. Szinay, D., Chang, S. -B., Khrustaleva, L., Peters, S., Schijlen, E., Bai, Y., Stiekema, W.J., van Ham, R.C.H.J., de Jong, H., and, Klein Lankhorst, R.M., (2008) High-resolution chromosome mapping of BACs using multi-colour FISH and pooled-BAC FISH as a backbone for sequencing tomato chromosome 6. Plant J. 56, 627-637.
62. Tang, X., Szinay, D., Lang, C., et al. (2008) Cross-species bacterial artificial chromosome-fluorescence in situ hybridization painiting of the tomato and potato chromosome 6 reveals undescribed chromosomal rearrangements. Genetics, 180, 1319-1328.
63. Tanksley, A.D., Bernatzkey, R., Lapitan, N.L., and, Prince, J.P., (1988) Conservation of gene repertoire but not gene order in pepper and tomato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 6419-6423.
64. Tanksley, S.D., Ganal, M.W., Prince, J.P., et al. (1992) High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics, 132, 1141-1160.
65. Tesler, G., (2002) GRIMM: genome rearrangements web server. Bioinformatics, 18, 492-493.
66. Thorup, T.A., Tanyolac, B., Livingstone, K.D., Popovsky, S., Paran, I., and, Jahn, M., (2000) Candidate gene analysis of organ pigmentation loci in the Solanaceae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 11192-11197.
67. Van der Hoeven, R., Ronning, C., Giovannoni, J., Martin, G., and, Tanksley, S., (2002) Deductions about the number, organization and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell, 14, 1441-1456.
68. Van der Knaap, E., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2003) The making of a bell pepper-shaped tomato fruit: identification of loci controlling fruit morphology in Yellow Stuffer tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 139-147.
69. Wang, Y., Diehl, A., Wu, F., Vrebalov, J., Giovannoni, J., Siepel, A., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2008) Sequencing and comparative analysis of a conserved syntenic segment in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 180, 391-408.
70. Wu, F., Mueller, L.A., Crouzillat, D., Pétiard, V., and, Tanksley, S.D., (2006) Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the Euasterid plant clade. Genetics, 174, 1407-1420.
71. Xu, Z., and, Wang, H., (2007) LTR-FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265-W268.
72. Yang, H.-B., Liu, W.Y., Kang, W. -H., Jahn, M., and, Kang, B. -C., (2009) Development of SNP markers linked to the L locus in Capsicum spp. by a comparative genetic analysis. Mol. Breed. 24, 433-446.
73. Zhang, J., Yu, C., Pulletikurti, V., Lamb, J., Danilova, T., Weber, D.F., Birchler, J., and, Peterson, T., (2009) Alternative Ac/Ds transposition induces major chromosomal rearrangements in maize. Genes Dev. 23, 755-765.
74. Zhong, X.B., de Jong, J.H., and, Zabel, P., (1996b) Preparation of tomato meiotic pachytene and mitotic metaphase chromosomes suitable for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome Res. 4, 24-28.
75. Ziolkovski, P.A., Blanc, G., and, Sadowski, J., (2003) Structural divergence of chromosomal segments that arose from successive duplication events in the Arabidopsis genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1339-1350.