On the intentional control of conditioned evaluative responses

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 89-98

  Balas, Robert ^a   Gawronski, Bertram ^b  

^a SWPS UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitude expression; Contingency memory; Evaluative conditioning; Judgmental correction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864513650     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bar-Anan Y., De Houwer J., Nosek B.A. Evaluative conditioning and conscious knowledge of contingencies: A correlational investigation with large samples. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:2313-2335. 10.1080/17470211003802442.
2. Corneille O., Yzerbyt V., Pleyers G., Mussweiler T. Beyond awareness and resources: Evaluative conditioning may be sensitive to processing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:279-282. 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.020.
3. Dawson M.E., Rissling A.J., Schell A.M., Wilcox R. Under what conditions can human affective conditioning occur without contingency awareness? Test of the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Emotion 2007, 7:755-766.
4. De Houwer J. The propositional approach to learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning and Behavior 2009, 37:1-20.
5. Dedonder J., Corneille O., Yzerbyt V., Kuppens T. Evaluative conditioning of high-novelty stimuli does not seem to be based on an automatic form of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:1118-1121.
6. De Houwer J., Thomas S., Baeyens F. Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:853-869. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853.
7. Draine S. Inquisit (version 3.0.3) [computer software] 2011, Millisecond Software, Seattle, WA, Retrieved from http://www.millisecond.com.
8. Fiedler K., Unkelbach C. Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition & Emotion 2011, 25:639-656.
9. Field A.P. Learning to like (and dislike): Associative learning of preferences. New directions in human associative learning 2005, 221-252. LEA, Mahwah, NJ. A.J. Wills (Ed.).
10. Field A.P., Moore A.C. Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm. Cognition & Emotion 2005, 19:217-243.
11. Gast A., Rothermund K. What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition & Emotion 2011, 25:89-110. 10.1080/02699931003696380.
12. Gawronski B., Bodenhausen G.V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:692-731. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
13. Gawronski B., Bodenhausen G.V. The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 44:59-127.
14. Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, in press.
15. Gawronski B., Walther E. What do memory data tell us about the role of contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48:617-623.
16. Hofmann W., De Houwer J., Perugini M., Baeyens F., Crombez G. Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:390-421. 10.1037/a0018916.
17. Howell D.C. The analysis of missing data. Handbook of social science methodology 2007, 208-224. Sage, London. W. Outhwaite, S. Turner (Eds.).
18. Hütter, M., Sweldens, S., Stahl, C., Unkelbach, C., & Klauer, K. C. Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, in press.
19. Jones C.R., Olson M.A., Fazio R.H. Evaluative conditioning: The " how" question. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 43:205-255.
20. Kruglanski A.W., Dechesne M. Are associative and propositional processes qualitatively distinct? Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:736-739.
21. Lang P.J., Bradley M.M., Cuthbert B.N. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-7 2008, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
22. Mitchell C.J., Anderson N.E., Lovibond P.F. Measuring evaluative conditioning using the Implicit Association Test. Learning & Motivation 2003, 34:203-217.
23. Mitchell C.J., De Houwer J., Lovibond P.F. The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2009, 32:183-198. 10.1017/s0140525x09000855.
24. Moors A., De Houwer J. Automaticity: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:297-326.
25. Olson M.A., Fazio R.H. Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science 2001, 12:147-413.
26. Pleyers G., Corneille O., Luminet O., Yzerbyt V. Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:130-144. 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130.
27. Pleyers G., Corneille O., Yzerbyt V., Luminet O. Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2009, 35:279-285. 10.1037/a0013429.
28. Rydell R.J., McConnell A.R. Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:995-1008.
29. Stahl C., Unkelbach C. Evaluative learning with single versus multiple unconditioned stimuli: The role of contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2009, 35:286-291. 10.1037/A0013255.
30. Stahl C., Unkelbach C., Corneille O. On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:404-420. 10.1037/A0016196.
31. Strack F., Hannover B. Awareness of the influence as a precondition for implementing correctional goals. The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior 1996, 579-596. Guilford Press, New York. P.M. Gollwitzer, J.A. Bargh (Eds.).
32. Sweldens S., Van Osselaer S., Janiszewski C. Evaluative conditioning procedures and the resilience of conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research 2010, 37:473-489.
33. Walther E., Gawronski B., Blank H., Langer T. Changing likes and dislikes through the back door: The us-revaluation effect. Cognition & Emotion 2009, 23:889-917. 10.1080/02699930802212423.
34. Wegener D.T., Petty R.E. The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 29:141-208.
35. Wilson T.D., Brekke N. Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:117-142.