PRL-dock: Protein-ligand docking based on hydrogen bond matching and probabilistic relaxation labeling

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2137-2153

  Wu, Meng Yun ^a   Dai, Dao Qing ^a   Yan, Hong ^b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Biomolecular interactions; Hydrogen bond matching; Probabilistic relaxation labeling; Protein ligand docking; Surface shape complementarity

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CALCULATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; KABSCH ALGORITHM; LABELING INDEX; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LIGAND DOCKING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REACTION OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RNA TRANSLATION; SCORING SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

RUMEX;

EID: 84864399987     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24104     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ballester PJ, Mitchell JBO. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: 1169-1175.
2. Axenopoulos A, Daras P, Papadopoulos G, Houstis E. A shape descriptor for fast complementarity matching in molecular docking. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2011; 8: 1441-1457.
3. Waszkowycz B, Clark DE, Gancia E. Outstanding challenges in protein-ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening. Wiley Interdisciplin Rev: Comput Mol Sci 2011; 1: 229-259.
4. Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2006; 65: 15-26.
5. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2002; 47: 409-443.
6. Huang SY, Zou X. Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking. Int J Mol Sci 2010; 11: 3016-3034.
7. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Daniel T, Repasky MP, Knoll EH, Shelley M, Perry JK, Shaw DE, Francis P, Shenkin PS. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 2004; 47: 1739-1749.
8. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol 1995; 245: 43-53.
9. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 1997; 267: 727-748.
10. Gu S, Koehl P, Hass J, Amenta N. Surface-histogram: a new shape descriptor for protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2012; 80: 221-238.
11. Leach AR. Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J Mol Biol 1994; 235: 345-356.
12. Meiler J, Baker D. ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2006; 65: 538-548.
13. Beglov D, Hall DR, Brenke R, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Minimal ensembles of side chain conformers for modeling protein-protein interactions. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2012; 80: 591-601.
14. Davis IW, Baker D. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. J Mol Biol 2009; 385: 381-392.
15. Król M, Tournier AL, Bates PA. Flexible relaxation of rigid-body docking solutions. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2007; 68: 159-169.
16. Claußen H, Buning C, Rarey M, Lengauer T. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J Mol Biol 2001; 308: 377-395.
17. Huang SY, Zou X. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2007; 66: 399-421.
18. Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FiberDock: flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2010; 78: 1503-1519.
19. Gardiner EJ, Willett P, Artymiuk PJ. Graph-theoretic techniques for macromolecular docking. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000; 40: 273-279.
20. 2 Dock: fast fourier protein-protein docking. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2011; 8: 45-58.
21. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. J Mol Biol 1995; 252: 263-274.
22. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson HL, Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Biol 1995; 248: 459-477.
23. Shentu Z, Al Hasan M, Bystroff C, Zaki MJ. Context shapes: efficient complementary shape matching for protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2008; 70: 1056-1073.
24. Meyer M, Wilson P, Schomburg D. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. JMol Biol 1996; 264: 199-210.
25. Smellie AS, Crippen GM, Richards WG. Fast drug-receptor mapping by site-directed distances: a novel method of predicting new pharmacological leads. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1991; 31: 386-392.
26. Luo W, Pei J, Zhu Y. A fast protein-ligand docking algorithm based on hydrogen bond matching and surface shape complementarity. J Mol Model 2010; 16: 903-913.
27. Waszkowycz B. Towards improving compound selection in structure-based virtual screening. Drug Discov Today 2008; 13: 219-226.
28. Kramer B, Rarey M, Lengauer T. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 1999; 37: 228-241.
29. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2003; 52: 609-623.
30. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998; 19: 1639-1662.
31. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 1996; 261: 470-489.
32. Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP. Empirical scoring functions: I. the development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aid Mol Des 1997; 11: 425-445.
33. Wang R, Lai L, Wang S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J Comput Aid Mol Des 2002; 16: 11-26.
34. Velec HFG, Gohlke H, Klebe G. DrugScoreCSD knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J Med Chem 2005; 48: 6296-6303.
35. DeWitte RS, Shakhnovich EI. SMoG: de novo design method based on simple, fast, and accurate free energy estimates. 1. methodology and supporting evidence. J Am Chem Soc 1996; 118: 11733-11744.
36. Rosenfeld A, Hummel RA, Zucker SW. Scene labeling by relaxation operations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cy 1976; 6: 420-433.
37. Zheng Y, Doermann D. Robust point matching for nonrigid shapes by preserving local neighborhood structures. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 2006; 28: 643-649.
38. Zhao HY, Chan KL, Cheng LM, Yan H. A probabilistic relaxation labeling framework for reducing the noise effect in geometric biclustering of gene expression data. Pattern Recogn 2009; 42: 2578-2588.
39. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1976; 32: 922-923.
40. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1978; 34: 827-828.
41. Shibuya T. Searching protein three-dimensional structures in faster than linear time. J Comput Biol 2010; 17: 593-602.
42. Yeturu K, Chandra NR. PocketAlign: a novel algorithm for aligning binding sites in protein structures. J Chem Inf Model 2011; 51: 1725-1736.
43. Shulman-Peleg A, Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Prediction of interacting single-stranded RNA bases by protein-binding patterns. J Mol Biol 2008; 379: 299-316.
44. Nissink JWM, Murray C, Hartshorn M, Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Taylor R. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2002; 49: 457-471.
45. Wang RX, Lu YP, Wang SM. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J Med Chem 2003; 46: 2287-2303.
46. Sadjad BS, Zsoldos Z. Toward a robust search method for the protein-drug docking problem. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2011; 8: 1120-1133.
47. Pei J, Wang Q, Liu Z, Li Q, Yang K, Lai L. PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2006; 62: 934-946.
48. Tsodikov OV, Record JrMT, Sergeev YV. Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature. J Comput Chem 2002; 23: 600-609.
49. Baker EN, Hubbard RE. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1984; 44: 97-179.
50. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 1605-1612.
51. Baxter C, Murray C, Waszkowycz B, Li J, Sykes R, Richard G, Perkins T, Wylie W. New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databases. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000; 40: 254-262.