Context shapes: Efficient complementary shape matching for protein-protein docking

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1056-1073

  Shentu, Zujun ^a   Al Hasan, Mohammad ^a   Bystroff, Christopher ^b   Zaki, Mohammed J ^a,b  

^a Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Local shape features; Protein docking; Protein shape matching; Protein surface representation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ENERGY TRANSFER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIGANDS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 38549107118     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21600     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Zanzoni A, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Quondam M, Ausiello G, Helmer-Citterich M, Cesareni G. MINT: a molecular interaction database. FEBS Lett 2002;513:135-140.
2. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
3. Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:36-40.
4. Wang C, Karpowich N, Hunt JF, Ranee M, Palmer AG. Dynamics of atp-binding cassette contribute to allosteric control, nucleotide binding and energy transduction in abc transporters. J Mol Biol 2004;342:525-537.
5. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
6. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2005;60:214-216.
7. Via A, Ferre F, Brannetti B, Helmer-Citterich M. Protein surface similarities: a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. Cell Mol Life Sci 2000;57:1970-1977.
8. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2002;47:409-443.
9. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of capri predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics, 2005;60:150-169.
10. Mendez R, Leplae R, Maria LD, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2003;52:51-67.
11. Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1991;88:10495-10499.
12. Wolfson HJ, Rigoutsos I. Geometric Hashing: an overview. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 1997;4:10-21.
13. Duhovny D, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Efficient unbound docking of rigid molecules. In 2nd Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Rome, Italy, September 2002, pp 185-200.
14. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson HL, Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Bio 1995;248:459-477.
15. 1 subunit interface. Biopolymers 1986;25:1229-1247.
16. Palma PN, Krippahl L, Wampler JE, Moura JG. Bigger: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2000;39:372-384.
17. Fahmy A, Wagner G. TreeDock: a tool for protein docking based on minimizing van der walls energies. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124: 1241-1250.
18. Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 1992;89:2195-2199.
19. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Bio, 1997;272:106-120.
20. Chen R, Weng Z. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2003;51:397-408.
21. Chen R, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2003;52:80-87.
22. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Proteins Eng 2001;14:105-113.
23. Vakser IA. Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng 1995;8:371-377.
24. Ritchie DW, Kemp GJL. Protein docking using spherical polar fourier correlations. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics 2000;39:178-194.
25. Bystroff C. MASKER: improved solvent excluded molecular surface area estimations using boolean masks. Protein Eng 2002;15:959-965.
26. Connolly ML. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science, 1983;221:709-713.
27. Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Spehner J-C. Fast and robust computation of molecular surfaces. In: 11th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 1995.
28. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Polak V, Shatsky M, Halperin I, Benyamini H, Barzilai A, Dror O, Haspel N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Taking geometry to its edge: fast unbound rigid (and hingebent) docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Genetics, 2003;52:107-112.
29. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins: Struc Funct Genetics 2003;52:88-91.
30. Bystroff C, Kraut J. Crystal structure of unliganded Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Ligand-induced conformational changes and cooperativity in binding. Biochemistry 1991;30(8):2227-3339.
31. Rini JM, Schulze-Gahmen U, Wilson IA. Structural evidence for induced fit as a mechanism for antibody-antigen recognition. Science 1992;255(5047):959.
32. Ewing TJA, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2001;15:411-428.
33. Li L, Chen R, Weng Z. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins Struct Funct Genetics 2003;53:693-707.
34. Sandak B, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers. Proteins Struct Funct Genetics 1998;32:159-174.
35. Wang J, Kollman PA, Kuntz ID. Flexible ligand docking: a multistep strategy approach. Proteins 1999;36:1-19.
36. Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D. ICM: a new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. Comput Chem 1994;15:488-506.
37. Lorber DM, Udo MK, Shoichet BK. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci 2002;11:1393-1408.