RosettaLigand Docking with Full Ligand and Receptor Flexibility

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 385, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 381-392

  Davis, Ian W ^a   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

backbone flexibility; protein flexibility; Rosetta; small molecule docking

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; RECEPTOR PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; ENERGY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 58149094776     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Leach A.R., Shoichet B.K., and Peishoff C.E. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 5851-5855
2. Sousa S.F., Fernandes P.A., and Ramos M.J. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. Proteins 65 (2006) 15-26
3. Osterberg F., Morris G.M., Sanner M.F., Olson A.J., and Goodsell D.S. Automated docking to multiple target structures: incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins 46 (2002) 34-40
4. Claussen H., Buning C., Rarey M., and Lengauer T. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J. Mol. Biol. 308 (2001) 377-395
5. Zhao Y., and Sanner M.F. FLIPDock: docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors. Proteins 68 (2007) 726-737
6. Sherman W., Day T., Jacobson M.P., Friesner R.A., and Farid R. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 534-553
7. Cozzini P., Kellogg G.E., Spyrakis F., Abraham D.J., Costantino G., Emerson A., et al. Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design. J. Med. Chem. 51 (2008) 6237-6255
8. Totrov M., and Abagyan R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18 (2008) 178-184
9. Meiler J., and Baker D. ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins 65 (2006) 538-584
10. Morris G.M., Goodsell D.S., Halliday R.S., Huey R., Hart W.E., Belew R.K., and Olson A.J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19 (1998) 1639-1662
11. Hartshorn M.J., Verdonk M.L., Chessari G., Brewerton S.C., Mooij W.T., Mortenson P.N., and Murray C.W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J. Med. Chem. 50 (2007) 726-741
12. Warren G.L., Andrews C.W., Capelli A.M., Clarke B., LaLonde J., Lambert M.H., et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 5912-5931
13. Bradley P., Misura K.M., and Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309 (2005) 1868-1871
14. Kuhlman B., Dantas G., Ireton G.C., Varani G., Stoddard B.L., and Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302 (2003) 1364-1368
15. Graves A.P., Shivakumar D.M., Boyce S.E., Jacobson M.P., Case D.A., and Shoichet B.K. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing. J. Mol. Biol. 377 (2008) 914-934
16. Gray J.J., Moughon S., Wang C., Schueler-Furman O., Kuhlman B., Rohl C.A., and Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331 (2003) 281-299
17. Jiang L., Althoff E.A., Clemente F.R., Doyle L., Rothlisberger D., Zanghellini A., et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319 (2008) 1387-1391
18. Rothlisberger D., Khersonsky O., Wollacott A.M., Jiang L., DeChancie J., Betker J., et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453 (2008) 190-195
19. Kuhlman B., and Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 10383-10388
20. Leaver-Fay A., Kuhlman B., and Snoeyink J. Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Mallorca, Spain (2005)
21. Wang C., Bradley P., and Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 373 (2007) 503-519
22. Wang C., Schueler-Furman O., and Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 14 (2005) 1328-1339
23. Das R., and Baker D. Macromolecular modeling with Rosetta. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77 (2008) 363-382
24. Lazaridis T., and Karplus M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10 (2000) 139-145
25. Kortemme T., Morozov A.V., and Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326 (2003) 1239-1259
26. Morozov A.V., Kortemme T., Tsemekhman K., and Baker D. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 6946-6951
27. Dunbrack R.L., and Cohen F.E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6 (1997) 1661-6981