Sampling strategy and potential utility of indels for DNA barcoding of closely related plant species: A case study in Taxus

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 8740-8751

  Liu, Jie ^a   Provan, Jim ^b   Gao, Lian Ming ^a   Li, De Zhu ^a  

^a KUNMING INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DNA barcoding; Indel (gap) coding; Noncoding chloroplast regions; Sampling strategy; Taxus

Indexed keywords

INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER; CHLOROPLAST DNA;

ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST; DNA BARCODING; DNA STRUCTURE; GENETIC DISTANCE; INDEL MUTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MATK GENE; MONOPHYLY; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENE; RANDOM SAMPLE; SAMPLE SIZE; SAMPLING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TAXUS; TRNH PSBA SPACER REGION; GENETICS;

TAXUS;

CHLOROPLASTS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; TAXUS;

EID: 84864348841     PISSN: 16616596     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms13078740     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; deWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 2003, 270, 313-321.
2. Lahaye, R.; van der Bank, M.; Bogarin, D.; Warner, J.; Pupulin, F.; Gigot, G.; Maurin, O.; Duthoit, S.; Barraclough, T.G.; Savolainen, V. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2923-2928.
3. Dalton, D.L.; Kotze, A. DNA barcoding as a tool for species identification in three forensic wildlife cases in South Africa. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 207, e51-e54.
4. Kress, W.J.; Erickson, D.L.; Jones, F.A.; Swenson, N.G.; Perez, R.; Sanjur, O.; Bermingham, E. Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18621-18626.
5. Valentini, A.; Pompanon, F.; Taberlet, P. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24, 110-117.
6. Kress, W.J.; Wurdack, K.J.; Zimmer, E.A.; Weigt, L.A.; Janzen, D.H. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8369-8374.
7. Fazekas, A.J.; Burgess, K.S.; Kesanakurti, P.R.; Graham, S.W.; Newmaster, S.G.; Husband, B.C.; Percy, D.M.; Hajibabaei, M.; Barrett, S.C. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS One 2008, 3, e2802.
8. Hollingsworth, P.M.; Graham, S.W.; Little, D.P. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19254.
9. China Plant BOL Group. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19641-19646.
10. Pennisi, E. Wanted: A barcode for plants. Science 2007, 318, 190-191.
11. CBOL Plant Working Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12794-12797.
12. Kress, W.J.; Erickson, D.L. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PloS One 2007, 2, e508.
13. T Taberlet, P.; Coissac, E.; Pompanon, F.; Gielly, L.; Miquel, C.; Valentini, A.; Vermat, T.; Corthier, G.; Brochmann, C.; Willerslev, E. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, e14.
14. Hollingsworth, M.L.; Clark, A.A.; Forrest, L.L.; Richardson, J.; Pennington, R.T.; Long, D.G.; Cowan, R.; Chase, M.W.; Gaudeul, M.; Hollingsworth, P.M. Selecting barcoding loci for plants: Evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9, 439-457.
15. Gonzalez, M.A.; Baraloto, C.; Engel, J.; Mori, S.A.; Pétronelli, P.; Riéra, B.; Roger, A.; Thébaud, C.; Chave, J. Identification of Amazonian trees with DNA barcodes. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7483.
16. Bruni, I.; de Mattia, F.; Galimberti, A.; Galasso, G.; Banfi, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Labra, M. Identification of poisonous plants by DNA barcoding approach. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2010, 124, 595-603.
17. Muellner, A.N.; Schaefer, H.; Lahaye, R. Evaluation of candidate DNA barcoding loci for economically important timber species of the mahogany family (Meliaceae). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 450-460.
18. Matz, M.V.; Nielsen, R. A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 1969-1974.
19. Meyer, C.P.; Paulay, G. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, 2229-2238.
20. Wiemers, M.; Fiedler, K. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist?-A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Front. Zool. 2007, 4, 8.
21. Zhang, A.B.; He, L.J.; Crozier, R.H.; Muster, C.; Zhu, C.D. Estimating sample sizes for DNA barcoding. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54, 1035-1039.
22. Simmons, M.P.; Ochoterena, H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49, 369-381.
23. Simmons, M.P.; Muller, K.; Norton, A.P. The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44, 724-740.
24. Dwivedi, B.; Gadagkar, S.R. Phylogenetic inference under varying proportions of indel-induced alignment gaps. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 211.
25. Graham, S.W.; Reeves, P.A.; Burns, A.C.E.; Olmstead, R.G. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2000, 161, S83-S96.
26. Farrington, L.; MacGillivray, P.; Faast, R.; Austin, A. Investigating DNA barcoding options for the identification of Caladenia (Orchidaceae) species. Aust. J. Bot. 2009, 57, 276-286.
27. Monaghan, M.T.; Balke, M.; Pons, J.; Vogler, A.P. Beyond barcodes: Complex DNA taxonomy of a South Pacific Island radiation. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 2006, 273, 887-893.
28. Newmaster, S.G.; Fazekas, A.J.; Steeves, R.A.D.; Janovec, J. Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008, 8, 480-490.
29. Liu, J.; Möller, M.; Gao, L.M.; Zhang, D.Q.; Li, D.Z. DNA barcoding for the discrimination of Eurasian yews (Taxus L., Taxaceae) and the discovery of cryptic species. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 89-100.
30. Möller, M.; Gao, L.M.; Mill, R.R.; Li, D.Z.; Hollingsworth, M.L.; Gibby, M. Morphometric analysis of the Taxus wallichiana complex (Taxaceae) based on herbarium material. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 155, 307-335.
31. Liu, J.; Gao, L.M. Comparative analysis of three different methods of total DNA extraction used in Taxus. Guihaia 2011, 31, 244-249.
32. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R. et al. Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947-2948.
33. ES-Computing. EditPlus Text Editor 3.20. Available online: http://www.editplus.com (accessed on 12 July 2012)
34. Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596-1599.
35. Müller, K. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 38, 667-676.
36. Nielsen, R.; Matz, M. Statistical approaches for DNA barcoding. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55, 162-169.
37. Egan, A.N.; Crandall, K.A. Incorporating gaps as phylogenetic characters across eight DNA regions: Ramifications for North American Psoraleeae (Leguminosae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 46, 532-546.
38. Provan, J.; Powell, W.; Hollingsworth, P.M. Chloroplast microsatellites: New tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 142-147.
39. Beatty, G.E.; Provan, J. Refugial persistence and postglacial recolonization of North America by the cold-tolerant herbaceous plant Orthilia secunda. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19, 5009-5021.
40. Beatty, G.E.; Provan, J. Phylogeographic analysis of North American populations of the parasitic herbaceous plant Monotropa hypopitys L. reveals a complex history of range expansion from multiple late glacial refugia. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38, 1585-1599.
41. Yu, W.B.; Huang, P.H.; Ree, R.H.; Liu, M.L.; Li, D.Z.; Wang, H. DNA barcoding of Pedicularis L. (Orobanchaceae): Evaluating four universal barcode loci in a large and hemiparasitic genus. J. Syst. Evol. 2011, 49, 425-437.
42. Nicolè, S.; Erickson, D.L.; Ambrosi, D.; Bellucci, E.; Lucchin, M.; Papa, R.; Kress, W.J.; Barcaccia, G. Biodiversity studies in Phaseolus species by DNA barcoding. Genome 2011, 54, 529-545.
43. Wolfe, K.H.; Li, W.H.; Sharp, P.M. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 9054-9058.
44. Drouin, G.; Daoud, H.; Xia, J. Relative rates of synonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear genomes of seed plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49, 827-831