Conjoint analysis of R&D contract agreements for industry-funded university research

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 532-549

  Sohn, So Young ^a   Lee, Mooyeob ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Industry academia collaboration; R D contract agreements

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864325505     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-011-9220-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., & Causino, N. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734-1739.
2. Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R& D Management, 24, 229-247.
3. Bruno, G. S. F., & Orsenigo, L. (2003). Variables influencing industrial funding of academic research in Italy. An empirical analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(2/3/4), 277-302.
4. Chamanski, A., & Waagø, S. J. (2001). Organizational performance of technology-based firms-The role of technology and business strategies. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(3), 205-223.
5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.
6. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
8. Crespi, G., Geuna, A., Nomaler, O. & Verspagen, B. (2010). University IPRs and knowledge transfer. Is university ownership more efficient? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19 (forthcoming).
9. Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38(1), 26-34.
10. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. (1987). Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. In G. Feiwel (Ed.), Arrow and the ascent of modern economic theory. New York: NYU Press. Chap 16.
11. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R& D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy, 35, 309-323.
12. Fusfeld, H. I. (1994). Industry's future. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
13. Green, P. E., & Rao, V. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 355-363.
14. Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2007). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35, 825-838.
15. Jaffe, A. B. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R& D: Evidence from firrus patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
16. Jeon, H. J., Kim, M. S., & Sohn, S. Y. (2010) Conjoint and WTP analysis of future mobile phones for digital convergence. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(3), 457-465.
17. Jung, C. H. (2007). A study on patent related provisions in a joint research agreement. The Journal of Korean Industrial Property Right, 23, 349-394.
18. Kilger, C., & Bartenbach, K. (2002). New rules for German professors. Science, 298(8), 1173-1175.
19. Kim, G., Kim, A., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009a). Conjoint analysis for luxury brand outlet malls in Korea with consideration of customer lifetime value. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 922-932.
20. Kim, A., Son, S., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009b). Conjoint analysis of enhanced english medium instruction for college students. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 10197-10203.
21. Korean Intellectual Property Office. (2008, 2010). http://www. kipo. go. kr/.
22. Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111-133.
23. Libaers, D., Meyer, M., & Geuna, A. (2006). The role of university spinout companies in an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 443-450.
24. Merton, D., & Starer, N. W. (Eds.). (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Mok, M. S., Sohn, S. Y., & Ju, Y. H. (2010). Conjoint analysis for intellectual property education. World Patent Information, 32(2), 129-134.
26. Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U. S. universities: An assessment of the effect of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy, 30, 99-119.
27. National Academy of Sciences. (1995). Allocating federal funds for science and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323-348.
29. Schmiemann, M., & Durvy, J. N. (2003). New approaches to technology transfer from publicly funded research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 9-15.
30. Sohn, S. Y., & Ju, Y. H. (2010). Conjoint analysis for recruiting high quality students for college education. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3777-3783.
31. Song, J., Jang, T., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009). Conjoint analysis for IPTV service. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7860-7864.
32. Stern, A. (1989). Information transfer between an academic research center and its member firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 14(3/4), 19-24.
33. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 87(3), 290-306.