Conjoint analysis for intellectual property education

World Patent Information

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 129-134

  Mok, Min Seok ^a   Sohn, So Young ^a   Ju, Yong Han ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Intellectual property education; School curricula

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949485009     PISSN: 01722190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wpi.2009.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hanel P. Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature. Technovation 26 8 (2006) 895-931
2. Lynn B.E. Intellectual capital: key to value added success in the next millennium. CMA - Manage Account Mag 72 1 (1998) 10-15
3. ETAN Expert Working Group. Strategic dimensions of intellectual property rights in the context of science and technology policy. Final report for the European Commission Directorate General XII-Science: Research and Development Directorate AP-Policy Co-ordination and Strategy, 1999.
4. Takagi Y., and Sinjela M. Harnessing the power of intellectual property - strategy and programs of the WIPO Worldwide Academy. World Patent Inform 29 2 (2007) 161-167
5. New Focus Research Pty Ltd. Report on awareness of intellectual property: prepared for intellectual protection Australia; 2000.
6. Bardehle H. Expectations of international and national offices: a user's view. In: Tager U., and von Witzleben A. (Eds). PATINNOVA '90: strategies for the protection of innovation: proceedings of the first European Congress on industrial property rights and innovation (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
7. Arai H. Japan's intellectual property strategy. World Patent Inform 28 4 (2006) 323-326
8. McAleer M., and Oxley L. Economic and legal issues in intellectual property (2007), Wiley-Blackwell
9. Rogers E.M., Takegami S., and Yin J. Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation 21 (2001) 253-261
10. Lichtenthaler E. Technological change and the technology intelligence process: a case study. J Eng Technol Manage 21 4 (2004) 331-348
11. Dou H.J.M. Benchmarking R&D and companies through patent analysis using free databases and special software: a tool to improve innovative thinking. World Patent Inform 26 4 (2004) 297-309
12. Pitkethly R.H. Intellectual property management in R&D collaborations: the case of the service industry sector. R&D Manage 37 5 (2007) 496-498
13. Parello C.P. A north-south model of intellectual property rights protection and skill accumulation. J Develop Econom 85 1/2 (2008) 253-281
14. Herce J.L. WIPO patent information services for developing countries. World Patent Inform 23 3 (2001) 295-308
15. Hoti S., McAleer M., and Slottje D. Intellectual property litigation activity in the USA. J Econom Surv 20 4 (2006) 715-729
16. Edward F.S., and David J.T. Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Res Policy 33 2 (2004) 179-191
17. Basmann R.L., McAleer M., and Slottje D. Patent activity and technical change. J Economet 139 2 (2007) 355-375
18. Green P.E., and Rao V.R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. J Market Res 8 (1971) 355-363
19. Cattin P., and Wittink D. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey. J Market 46 (1982) 44-53
20. Green P.E., Krieger A.M., and Agarwal M.K. Adaptive conjoint analysis: some caveats and suggestions. J Market Res 28 (1991) 215-221
21. Carroll J.D., and Green P.E. Psychometric methods in marketing research: Part 1 conjoint analysis. J Market Res 32 4 (1995) 385-391
22. Agarwal M.K., and Green P.E. Adaptive conjoint analysis versus self-explicated models: some empirical results. Int J Res Market 8 (1991) 141-146
23. Singh J., Cuttler L., Shin M., Silvers J.B., and Neuhauser D. Medical decision-making and the patient: understanding preference patterns for growth hormone therapy using conjoint analysis. Med Care 36 (1998) AS31-AS45