Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations;Técnicas disponibles de monitorización hemodinámica. Ventajas y limitaciones

Medicina Intensiva

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 434-444

  Mateu Campos, M L ^a   Ferrandiz Selles A ^a   Gruartmoner de Vera, G ^b   Mesquida Febrer, J ^b   Sabatier Cloarec, C ^b   Poveda Hernandez Y ^c   Garcia Nogales X ^b  

^a Sección de Microbiología Hospital Universitario General de Castellón   (Spain)

^b PARC TAULÍ HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL TXAGORRITXU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Hemodynamic monitoring; Hemodynamic variables

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CRITICAL CARE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LITHIUM CHLORIDE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OXIMETRY; OXYGEN; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 84864307726     PISSN: 02105691     EISSN: 15786749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Swan H.J.C., Ganz W., Forrester J.S., Marcus H., Diamond G., Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with the use of a flow-directed balloon tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 1970, 283:447-451.
2. Connors A.F., Speroff T., Dawson N.V., Thomas C., Harrell F.E., Wagner D., et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996, 276:889-897. for the SUPPORT Investigators.
3. Polanczyk C.A., Rohde L.E., Goldman L., Cook E.F., Thomas E.J., Marcantonio E.R., et al. Right heart catheterization and cardiac complication in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: an observational study. JAMA 2001, 286:309-314.
4. Richard C., Warszawski J., Anguel N., Deye N., Combes A., Barnoud D., et al. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003, 290:2713-2720.
5. Rhodes A., Cusack R.J., Newman P.J., Grounds R.M., Benett E.D. A randomized, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28:256-264.
6. Harvey S., Harrison D.A., Singer M., Ashcroft J., Jones C.M., Elbourne D., et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366:472-477.
7. Clinical trials Network. Pulmonary artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:2213-2224. The National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).
8. Pinsky M.R., Vincent J.L. Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:1119-1122.
9. Vincent J.L., Pinsky M.R., Sprung C., Levy M., Marini J.J., Payen D., et al. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:3093-3096.
10. Alhashemi J.A., Cecconi M., Hofer C. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care 2011, 15:214.
11. Geerts B.F., Aarts L.P., Jansen J.R. Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011, 71:316-330.
12. Lee A.J., Cohn J.H., Ranasinghe J.S. Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011, 2011:151-475.
13. García X., Mateu L., Maynar J., Mercadal J., Ochagavía A., Ferrándiz A. Estimación del gasto cardíaco. Utilidad en la práctica clínica. Monitorización disponible invasiva y no invasiva. Med Intensiva 2011, 35:552-561.
14. Boussuges A., Blanc P., Molenat F., Burnet H., Habib G., Sainty J.M. Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:362-367.
15. Voga G. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation by transesophageal echocardiography: is simpler better?. Crit Care 2008, 12:127.
16. Michard F., Teboul J.L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008.
17. Pinsky M.R. Hemodynamic Profile, Interpretation. Principles and Practice of Intensive Care Monitoring 1998, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 871-888. M.J. Tobin (Ed.).
18. Ospina-Tascon G.A., Cordioli R.L., Vincent J.L. What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:800-820.
19. Vincent J.L., Bihari D., Suter P.M., Bruining H.A., White J., Nicolas-Chanoin M.H., et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe, Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995, 274:639-644.
20. Sakr Y., Vincent J.L., Reinhart K., Payen D., Wiedermann C.J., Zandstra D.F., et al. Use of the pulmonary artery catheter is not associated with worse outcome in the intensive care unit. Chest 2005, 128:2722-2731.
21. Iberti T.J., Daily E.K., Leibowitz A.B., Panacek E.A., Silverstein J.H., Albertson T.E. A multicenter study of physicians knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter, Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group. JAMA 1990, 264:2928-2932.
22. Polonen P., Ruokonen E., Hippelainen M., Poyhonen M., Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anaesth Analg 2000, 90:1052-1059.
23. Tuchschmidt J., Fried J., Astiz M., Rackow E. Elevation of cardiac output and oxygen delivery improves outcome in septic shock. Chest 1992, 102:216-220.
24. Lobo S.M.A., Salgado P.F., Castillo V.G.T., Borim A.A., Polachini C.A., Palchetti J.C., et al. Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med 2000, 28:3396-3404.
25. Kern J.W., Shoemaker W.C. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:1686-1692.
26. Hadian M., Pinsky M.R. Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications. Crit Care 2006, 10(Suppl 3):S8.
27. Frank O. Die Gründform des arterielen Pulses erste Abhandlung: mathematische Analyse. Z Biol 1899, 483-526.
28. Goedje O., Hoeke K., Lichtwarck-Aschoff M., Faltchauser A., Lamm P., Reichart B. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour análisis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999, 27:2407-2412.
29. Chakravarthy M., Patil T.A., Jayaprakash K., Kalligud P., Prabhakumar D., Jawali V. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery-aprospective observational study. Ann Cardiac Anaesth 2007, 10:121-126.
30. Boyle M., Lawrence J., Belessis A., Murgo M., Shehabi Y. Comparison of dynamic measurements of pulse contour with pulsed heat cpontinuous cardiac output in postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Austr Crit Care 2007, 20:27-32.
31. Garcia-Rodriguez C., Pittman J., Cassell C.H., Sum-Ping J., El-Moalem H., Young C., et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: A Clinical assessment of central venous and peripheral venous indicator injection. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:2199-2204.
32. Hamilton T.T., Huber L.M., Jessen M.E. PulseCOTM: a less-lnvasive method to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002, 74:S1408-S1412.
33. Pittman J., Bar Yosef S., Sum Ping J., Sherwood M., Mark J. Continuous cardiac output monitoring with pulse contour analysis: A comparison with lithium indicator dilution cardiac output measurement. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:2015-2021.
34. Smith J., Kirwan C., Lei K., Beale R. A comparison of two calibrated, continuous, arterial waveform based measurements of cardiac output over 24hours. Crit Care Med 2005, 33(Suppl 12). 207-S; A56.
35. McGee W.T., Horswell J.L., Calderon J., Janvier G., Van Severen T., Van den Berghe G., et al. Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial. Crit Care 2007, 11:R105.
36. Sakka S.G., Kozieras J., Thuemer O., Van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour análisis. Br J Anaesth 2007, 99:337-342.
37. Mayer J., Boldt J., Poland R., Peterson A., Manecke G.R. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. Emerging technology review. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 2009, 23:401-406.
38. Hofer C.K., Senn A., Weibel L., Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volumen variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac™ and PiCCO plus™. Critical Care 2008, 12:R82.
39. Mayer J., Boldt J., Mengistu A.M., Röhm D., Suttner S. Goal directed intraoperative therapy base on autocalibrated arterial pressure reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010, 14:R18.
40. Bendjelid K., Giraud R., Siegenthaler N., Michard F. Validation of a new transpulmonary thermodilution system to assess global end-diastolic volume and extravascular lung water. Crit Care 2010, 14:R209.
41. Scolleta S., Romano S.M., Biagioli B., Capannini G., Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output duriong various hemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:159-165.
42. Zangrillo A., Maj G., Monaco F., Scandroglio A.M., Nuzzi M., Plumari V., et al. Cardiac index validation using the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010, 24:265-269.
43. Franchi F., Silvestri R., Cubattoli L., Taccone F.S., Donadello K., Romano S.M., et al. Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients. Br J Anaesth 2011, 107:202-208.
44. Mathews L., Singh K. Cardiac output monitoring. Ann Cardiac Anaesth 2008, 11:56-68.
45. Jover J.L., Soro M., Belda F.J., Aguilar G., Caro P., Ferrandis R. Medición del gasto cardíaco en el postoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca: Validez de la reinhalación parcial de CO2. (NICO®) frente a la termodilución continua mediante catéter de arteria pulmonar. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2005, 52:256-262.
46. Gueret G., Kiss G., Rossignol B., Bezon E., Wargnier J.P., Miossec A., et al. Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006, 23:848-854.
47. Keren H., Burkhoff D., Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol 2007, 293:H583-H589.
48. Squara P., Denjean D., Estagnasie P., Brusset A., Dib J.C., Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:1191-1194.
49. Raval N.Y., Squara P., Cleman M., Yalamanchili K., Winklmaier M., Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2008.
50. Thom O., Taylor D.M., Wolfe R.E., Cade J., Myles P., Krum H., et al. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:800-804.
51. Chand R., Mehta Y., Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth 2006, 20:315-319.
52. Horster S., Stemmler H.J., Strecker N., Brettner F., Haussmann A., Cnossen J., et al. Cardiac ouput measurements in septic patients: comparing the accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO. Crit Care Res Parct 2012, 270-631.
53. Monge M.I., Estella á., Díaz J.C., Gil A. Monitorización hemodinámica mínimamente invasiva con eco-doppler esofágico. Med Intensiva 2008, 32:33-44.
54. Sinclair S., James S., Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997, 315:909-912.
55. Conway D.H., Mayall R., Abdul-Latif M.S., Gilligan S., Tackaberry C. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 2002, 57:845-849.
56. Noblett S.E., Snowden C.P., Shenton B.K., Horgan A.F. Randomised clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006, 93:1069-1076.
57. Monge M.I., Gil A., Estella A., Sainz A., Díaz J.C. Acute cardiorrespiratory effects during stepwise lung recruitment maneuver. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32:S121.
58. Cipolla J., Stawicki S., Spatz D. Hemodynamic monitoring of organ donors: a novel use of esophageal echo-Doppler probe. Am Surg 2006, 72:500-504.
59. Vallé F., Fourcade O., De Soyres O., Angles O., Sánchez-Verlaan P., Pillard F., et al. Stroke volume variations calculated by esophageal Doppler is a reliable predictor of luid response. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:1388-1393.
60. Monnet X., Rienzo M., Osman D., Anguel N., Richard C., Pinsky M.R., et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:1402-1407.
61. Slagt C., Breukers R.M., Groeneveld J. Choosing patient-tailored hemdynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2010, 14:208.
62. Mesquida J., Borrat X., Lorente J.A., Masip J., Baigorri F. Objetivos de la reanimación hemodinámica. Med Intensiva 2011, 35:499-508.