Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: A multicenter, prospective clinical trial

Critical Care

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2007, Pages

  McGee, William T ^a   Horswell, Jeffrey L ^b   Calderon, Joachim ^c   Janvier, Gerard ^c   Van Severen, Tom ^d   Van den Berghe, Greet ^d   Kozikowski, Lori ^a  

^a BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Groupe Hospitalier Sud CHU de Bordeaux   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE BASED CARDIAC OUTPUT; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINUOUS CARDIAC OUTPUT; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERMITTENT THEMODILUTION CARDIAC OUTPUT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULSE WAVE; RELIABILITY; THERMODILUTION; TREATMENT INDICATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SWAN GANZ CATHETER; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 36549031653     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/cc6125     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gonzalez J Delafosse C Fartoukh M Capderou A Straus C Zelter M Derenne JP Similowski T Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients Crit Care 2003, 7:171-178. 270608 12720564
2. Rapoport J Teres D Steingrub J Higgins T McGee W Lemeshow S Patient characteristics and ICU organizational factors that influence frequency of pulmonary artery catheterization JAMA 2000, 283:2559-2567. 10815120
3. Hall JB Use of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: was invention the mother of necessity? JAMA 2000, 283:2577-2578. 10815124
4. Berton C Cholley B Equipment review: New techniques for cardiac output measurement - oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle using carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis Crit Care 2002, 6:216-221. 137448 12133181
5. Chaney JC Derdak S Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: Current and emerging technology Crit Care Med 2002, 30:2338-2345. 12394965
6. Rhodes A Sunderland R Arterial pulse power analysis: The LiDCOplus system Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring Berlin: Springer-Verlag Pinsky M, Payen D 2005, 183-192.
7. Goedje O Hoeke K Lichtwarck-Aschoff M Faltchauser A Lamm P Reichart B Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: Comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution Crit Care 1999, 27:2578-2579.
8. Pratt B Roteliuk L Hatib F Frazier J Wallen R Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) using a novel measurement and analysis method Biomed Instrum Technol 2007, 41:403-411.
9. de Vaal JB de Wilde RB van den Berg PC Schreuder JJ Jansen JR Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:326-331. 16006488
10. Romano SM Pistolesi M Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans Crit Care Med 2002, 30:1834-1841. 12163802
11. Wesseling KH Jansen JR Settels JJ Schreuder JJ Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model J Appl Physiol 1993, 74:2566-2573. 8335593
12. Schmid ER Schmidlin D Tornic M Seifert B Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: Clinical validation against a reference technique of known accuracy Intensive Care Med 1999, 25:166-172. 10193543
13. Elkayam U Berkley R Azen S Weber L Geva B Henry WL Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically ill patient Chest 1983, 84:418-422. 6352195
14. Nilsson LB Nilsson JC Skovgaard LT Berthelsen PG Thermodilution cardiac output - are three injections enough? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004, 48:1322-1327. 15504196
15. Bland JM Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986, i:307-310.
16. Dhingra VK Fenwick JC Walley KR Chittock DR Ronco JJ Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients Chest 2002, 122:990-997. 12226045
17. Bland JM Altman DG Comparing methods of measurement: Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading Lancet 1995, 346:1085-1087. 7564793
18. Critchley LAH Critchley JAJH A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques J Clin Monit Comput 1999, 15:85-91. 12578081
19. Sun Q Rogiers P Pauwels D Vincent JL Comparison of continuous thermodilution and bolus cardiac output measurements in septic shock Intensive Care Med 2002, 28:1276-1280. 12209277
20. Kothari N Amaria T Hegde A Mandke A Mandke NV Measurement of cardiac output: Comparison of four different methods Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 19:163-168.
21. Stetz CW Miller RG Kelly GE Raffin TA Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice Am Rev Respir Dis 1982, 126:1001-1004. 6758640
22. Jansen J Schreuder JJ Mulier J Smith M Settels J Wesseling K A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients Br J Anaesth 2001, 87:212-222. 11493492
23. Orme RE Pigott D Mihm F Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution Anaesthesia 2004, 59:590-594. 15144300