Epigenetic regulation and the variability of gene expression

Nature Genetics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 141-147

  Choi, Jung Kyoon ^a   Kim, Young Joon ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE; TATA BINDING PROTEIN ASSOCIATED FACTOR; TATA BINDING PROTEIN RELATED FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DNA BINDING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EPIGENETICS; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; TATA BOX; YEAST;

CHROMATIN; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC MARKERS; HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASES; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; NUCLEOSOMES; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TATA-BINDING PROTEIN ASSOCIATED FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TFIID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 38649094557     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2007.58     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Landry, C.R., Lemos, B., Rifkin, S.A., Dickinson, W.J. & Hartl, D.L. Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression. Science 317, 118-121 (2007).
2. Brem, R.B., Yvert, G., Clinton, R. & Kruglyak, L. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296, 752-755 (2002).
3. Brem, R.B. & Kruglyak, L. The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1572-1577 (2005).
4. Tirosh, I., Weinberger, A., Carmi, M. & Barkai, N. A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nat. Genet. 38, 830-834 (2006)
5. Prendergast, J.G. et al. Chromatin structure and evolution in the human genome. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 72 (2007).
6. Steinfeld, I., Shamir, R. & Kupiec, M. A genome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrates the influence of chromatin modifiers on transcription. Nat. Genet. 39, 303-309 (2007).
7. Stephens, M.A. Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-von Mises and related statistics without extensive tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. (B) 32, 115-122 (1970).
8. Lee, S-I., Pe'er, D., Dudley, A.M., Church, G.M. & Koller, D. Identifying regulatory mechanisms using individual variation reveals key role for chromatin modification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14062-14067 (2006).
9. Yvert, G. et al. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat. Genet. 35, 57-64 (2003).
10. Hu, Z., Killion, P.J. & Iyer, V.R. Genetic reconstruction of a functional transcriptional regulatory network. Nat. Genet. 39, 683-687 (2007).
11. Harbison, C.T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99-104 (2004)
12. Basehoar, A.D., Zanton, S.J. & Pugh, B.F. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell 116, 699-709 (2004).
13. Huisinga, K.L. & Pugh, B.F. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 13, 573-585 (2004).
14. Chitikila, C., Huisinga, K.L., Irvin, J.D., Basehoar, A.D. & Pugh, B.F. Interplay of TBP inhibitors in global transcriptional control. Mol. Cell 10, 871-882 (2002).
15. Jackson-Fisher, A.J., Chitikila, C., Mitra, M. & Pugh, B.F. A role for TBP dimerization in preventing unregulated gene expression. Mol. Cell 3, 717-727 (1999).
16. Durant, M. & Pugh, B.F. Genome-wide relationships between TAF1 and histone acetyltransferases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2791-2802 (2006).
17. Wray, G.A. et al. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1377-1419 (2003).
18. Choi, J.K. & Kim, S.C. Environmental effects on gene expression phenotype have regional biases in the human genome. Genetics 175, 1607-1613 (2007).
19. Fraga, M.F. et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10604-10609 (2005).
20. Ronald, J., Brem, R.B., Whittle, J. & Kruglyak, L. Local regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1, e25 (2005).
21. Holstege, F.C. et al. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95, 717-728 (1998).
22. Wyrick, J.J. et al. Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast. Nature 402, 418-421 (1999).
23. Pokholok, D.K. et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122, 517-527 (2005).
24. Sabet, N. et al. Gloal and specific transcriptional repression by the histone H3 amino terminus in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4084-4089 (2003).
25. Guarente, L. Diverse and dynamic functions of the Sir silencing complex. Nat. Genet. 23, 281-285 (1999).
26. Rudra, D., Zhao, Y. & Warner, J.R. Central role of Ifh1p-Fhl1p interaction in the synthesis of yeast ribosomal proteins. EMBO J. 24, 533-542 (2005).
27. Ho, Y. e.a. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183 (2002).
28. Gavin, A.C. e.a. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
29. Sanders, S.L., Jennings, J., Canutescu, A., Link, A.J. & Weil, P.A. Proteomics of the eukaryotic transcription machinery: identification of proteins associated with components of yeast TFIID by multidimensional mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4723-4738 (2002).
30. Kadosh, D. & Struhl, K. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89, 365-371 (1997).
31. Fazzio, T.G. et al. Widespread collaboration of Isw2 and Sin3-Rpd3 chromatin remodeling complexes in transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6450-6460 (2001).