Bobath Concept versus constraint-induced movement therapy to improve arm functional recovery in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 705-715

  Huseyinsinoglu, Burcu Ersoz ^a   Ozdincler, Arzu Razak ^b   Krespi, Yakup ^a  

^a FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

arm; Bobath Concept; constraint induced movement therapy; rehabilitation; stroke recovery

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

ARM; EXERCISE MOVEMENT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REHABILITATION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE;

EID: 84864204588     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215511431903     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Patel MD, Tilling K, Lawrence E, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C. Relationships between long-term stroke disability, handicap and health-related quality of life. Age Ageing. 2006 ; 35: 273-279
2. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005 ; 36: 1480-1484 (Pubitemid 40967516)
3. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002 ; 33: 1840-1844 (Pubitemid 34761072)
4. Graham JV, Eustace C, Brock K, Swain E, Irwin-Carruthers S. The Bobath Concept in contemporary clinical practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 ; 16: 57-68
5. Luke C, Dodds K, Brock K. Outcomes of the Bobath Concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 ; 18: 888-898 (Pubitemid 39642268)
6. Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006 ; 42: 257-268 (Pubitemid 46030368)
7. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 ;: CD004433
8. Sterr A, Szameitat A, Shen S, Freivogel S. Application of the CIT concept in the clinical environment: hurdles, practicalities, and clinical benefits. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006 ; 19: 48-54
9. Young JA, Tolentino M. Neuroplasticity and its applications for rehabilitation. Am J Ther. 2011 ; 18: 70-80
10. Liepert J. Evidence-based therapies for arm dysfunction. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010 ; 23: 678-682
11. Kwakkel G, Van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke. A meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004 ; 35: 2529-2536 (Pubitemid 39458412)
12. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on arm function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 ; 296: 2095-2104 (Pubitemid 44664704)
13. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001 ; 32: 1635-1639 (Pubitemid 32631916)
14. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing arm function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 ; 82: 750-755 (Pubitemid 32520783)
15. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The motor activity log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006 ; 67: 1189-1194 (Pubitemid 44563826)
16. Huseyinsinoglu BE, Ozdincler AR, Oǧul OE, Krespi Y. Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Motor Activity Log-28. Turkish J Neurol. 2011 ; 17: 83-89
17. Van de, Winckel A, Feys H, van der Knaap S, et al. Can quality of movement be measured? Rasch analysis and inter-rater reliability of the Motor Evaluation Scale for Arm in Stroke Patients (MESUPES). Clin Rehabil. 2006 ; 20: 871-884 (Pubitemid 46940495)
18. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000 ; 25: 3186-3191 (Pubitemid 32042951)
19. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al. The functional independence measure: A comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil. 1995 ; 17: 10-14
20. Kücükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil. 2001 ; 15: 311-319 (Pubitemid 32471890)
21. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral seciences. 1988. Cohen J, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ; 1988 :
22. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for arm after stroke. Stroke. 2006 ; 37: 1045-1049
23. Lin KC, Wu CY, Liu JS, Chen YT, Hsu CJ. Constraint-induced therapy versus dose-matched control intervention to improve motor ability, basic/extended daily functions, and quality of life in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 160-165
24. Dahl AE, Askim T, Stock R, Langorgen E, Lydersen S, Indredavik B. Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: A randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008 ; 22: 436-447 (Pubitemid 351833333)
25. Brogardh C, Flansbjer UB, Lexell J. What is the long-term benefit of constraint-induced movement therapy? A four-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil. 2009 ; 23: 418-423
26. Langan J, van Donkelaar P. The influence of hand dominance on the response to a constraint-induced therapy program following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 298-304 (Pubitemid 351561673)
27. Fritz SL, Light KE, Clifford SN, Patterson TS, Behrman AL, Davis SB. Descriptive characteristics as potential predictors of outcomes following constraint-induced movement therapy for people after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006 ; 86: 825-832 (Pubitemid 43837161)
28. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (vectors): A single-center RCT. Neurology. 2009 ; 73: 195-201
29. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: Magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 ; 17: 48-57 (Pubitemid 37102027)
30. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D, et al. The EXCITE trial: Relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the wolf motor function test. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007 ; 25: 549-562 (Pubitemid 351525717)
31. Platz T, Eickhof C, van Kaick S, et al. Impairment-oriented training or bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: A single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005 ; 19: 714-724 (Pubitemid 41489525)
32. Myint MW, Yuen FC, Yu KK, et al. Use of constraint-induced movement therapy in chinese stroke patients during the sub-acute period. Hong Kong Med J. 2008 ; 14: 40-42
33. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2000 ; 14: 361-369 (Pubitemid 30496574)
34. Gelber DA, Josefczyk PB, Herman D, Good DC, Verhulst SJ. Comparison of two therapy approaches in the rehabilitation of the pure motor hemiparetic stroke patient. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1995 ; 9: 191-196 (Pubitemid 126015538)