Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Motor Activity Log-28;Motor aktivite günlüǧü-28'in Türkçe Sürümünün geçerlilik ve güvenilirliǧi

Turk Noroloji Dergisi

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 83-89

  Hüseyinsinoǧlu, Burcu Ersöz ^a   Özdinçler, Arzu Razak ^a   Oǧul, Özden Erkan ^b   Krespi, Yakup ^b  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Reliability and validity; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

EID: 79959846378     PISSN: 1301062X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001;32:1279-84.
2. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394-8.
3. Lindeboom R, Vermeulen M, Holman R, De Haan RJ. Activities of daily living instruments. Optimizing scales for neurologic assessments. Neurology 2003;60:738-42.
4. Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:787-95.
5. Mark VW, Taub E, Morris DM. Neuroplasticity and constraintinduced movement therapy. Eura Medicophys 2006;42:269-84.
6. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier JY. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009;52:269-93.
7. Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC. Arm function after stroke: neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1641-59.
8. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WD, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
9. Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 2006;42:257-68.
10. Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010;46:537-44.
11. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson A. The Motor Activity Log-28. Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006;67:1189-94.
12. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;296:2095-104.
13. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32.
14. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:750-5.
15. Thrane G, Emaus N, Aksim T, Anke A. Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:299-304.
16. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, Johnson J, Rossiter D, Petruckevitch A, et al. The functional independence measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:10-4.
17. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
18. Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Responsiveness and validity of the Motor Activity Log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1184-93.
19. van der Lee, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2004;35:1410-4.
20. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vingolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real world arm use. Stroke 2005;36:2493-6.
21. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006;20:380-9.
22. Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR, Haaland KY. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke 2009;40:545-50.