Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: Magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 48-57

  Wittenberg, George F ^a,d   Chen, Robert ^a   Ishii, Kenji ^a   Bushara, Khalafalla O ^a   Taub, Edward ^c   Gerber, Lynn H ^b   Hallett, Mark ^a   Cohen, Leonardo G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^d WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral infarction; Clinical trial; Positron emission tomography; Subcortical; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR AND PROCESS SKILLS; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY LOG; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT THERAPY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TEST; BRAIN CORTEX; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; MAGNETISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SCINTISCANNING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037361427     PISSN: 08884390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0888439002250456     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJS, et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol 1993;33:181-9.
2. Weder B, Knorr U, Herzog H, et al. Tactile exploration of shape after subcortical ischaemic infarction studied with PET. Brain 1994;117:593-605.
3. Pennisi G, Rapisarda G, Bella R, et al. Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke 1999;30:2666-70.
4. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, et al. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997;28:110-17.
5. Hummelsheim H, Hauptmann B, Neumann S. Influence of physiotherapeutic facilitation techniques on motor evoked potentials in centrally paretic hand extensor muscles. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:18-28.
6. Brouwer BJ, Ambury P. Upper extremity weight-bearing effect on corticospinal excitability following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:861-6.
7. Abonen JP, Jehkonen M, Dastidar P, et al. Cortical silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:224-9.
8. Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, et al. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;101:316-28.
9. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32.
10. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rebabil 1993;74:347-54.
11. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237-51.
12. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.
13. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, et al. Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport 1999;10:807-10.
14. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210-16.
15. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369-75.
16. Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, et al, Constraint-induced movement therapy for moter recovery after stroke. Neurorehab 1997;9:29-43.
17. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 1994;61:281-93.
18. Morris D, Uswatte G, Crago J, et al. The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:750-55.
19. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, et al. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635-9.
20. Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press; 2001.
21. Chen R, Tam A, Bütefisch C, et al. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 1998;80:2870-81.
22. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1993;471:501-19.
23. 15O]water studies with 6-minute and 10-minute interscan intervals: single-subject and group analyses. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:570-82.
24. Wittenberg G, Bastian AJ, Dromerick AW Jr, et al. Mirror movements complicate interpretation of cerebral activation changes during recovery from subcortical infarction. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2000;14:213-21.
25. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, et al. Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991;11:690-9.
26. Woods RP. Modeling for intergroup comparisons of imaging data. Neuroimage 1996;4:S84-94.
27. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ. How many subjects constitute a study? Neuroimage 1999;10:1-5.
28. Stauffer LM, Fisher AG, Duran L. ADL performance of black Americans and white Americans on the assessment of motor and process skills. Am J Occup Ther 2000;54:607-13.
29. Thickbroom GW, Sammut R, Mastaglia FL. Magnetic stimulation mapping of motor cortex: factors contributing to map area. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:79-84.
30. Bohning DE, He L, George MS, et al. Deconvolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) maps. J Neural Transm 2001;108:35-52.
31. Liepert J, Miltner WHR, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.
32. Liepert J, Tegenthoff M, Malin JP. Changes of cortical motor area size during immobilization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:382-6.
33. Liepert J, Storch P, Fritsch A, et al. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:671-6.
34. Petersen SE, van Mier H, Fiez JA, et al. The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:853-60.
35. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:861-8.
36. Carel C, Loubinoux I, Boulanouar K, et al. Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000;20:478-84.