Descriptive characteristics as potential predictors of outcomes following constraint-induced movement therapy for people after stroke

Physical Therapy

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 825-832

  Fritz, Stacy L ^a,b,c   Light, Kathye E ^b   Clifford, Shannon N ^b,d,e   Patterson, Tara S ^b   Behrman, Andrea L ^b,c   Davis, Sandra B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^e CHATHAM COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint induced movement therapy; Hemiplegia; Physical therapy; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPLEGIA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY LOG AMOUNT SCALE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PREDICTION; RATING SCALE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TEST;

EID: 33744816187     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/86.6.825     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Fritz SL, Light K, Patterson T, et al. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:1172-1177.
2. Morris D, Crago J, DeLuca S, et al. Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1997;9:29-43.
3. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.
4. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Wagenaar R. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999;13:457-470.
5. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624-628.
6. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847-853.
7. Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592.
8. Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, et al. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurology. 2002;8:325-338.
9. Dromerick A, Edwards D, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31: 2984-2988.
10. Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3:279-286.
11. Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh IP, Wang CH. Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:2626-2630.
12. Wolf SL. Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (ExCITE). Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 2000. NCMRR-funded grant (R01HD037606-01A1).
13. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, et al. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:750-755.
14. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. Neglect and Related Disorders: Clinical Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993: 279-386.
15. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181-2186.
16. Nakayama H. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:27-32.
17. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23:1084-1089.
18. Kugler C, Altenhoner T, Lochner P, Ferbert A. Does age influence early recovery from ischemic stroke? A study from the Hessian Stroke Data Bank. J Neurol 2003;250:676-681.
19. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2002;33:179-185.
20. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, et al. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. Stroke. 2003;34:1114-1119.
21. Wyller TB, Sodring KM, Sveen U, et al. Are there gender differences in functional outcome after stroke? Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:171-179.
22. Twigg A, Cifu D, Keyser-Marcus L, Swartz Z. The association between gender, race and marital status on functional outcome at rehabilitation discharge after thromboembolic stroke: a prospective analysis. Neurorehabilitation. 1988;11:249-254.
23. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1357-1363.
24. Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke. 2002;33:1041-1047.
25. Ornstein R. The Right Mind: Making Sense of the Hemispheres. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Co; 1997.
26. Umphred D. Neurological Rehabilitation. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1995.
27. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394-398.
28. Hellige J. Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1993.
29. Ward NS, Frackowiak RS. Age-related changes in the neural correlates of motor performance. Brain. 2003;126(pt 4):873-888.
30. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986;17:765-776.
31. Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Fowler RS, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: outcome and prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:383-389.
32. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, et al. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181-1188.
33. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319(7211): 670-674.
34. Neter J, Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. Chicago, Ill: McGraw-Hill College; 1996.
35. Pigeot I. The jackknife and bootstrap in biomedical research: common principles and possible pitfalls. Drug Informational Journal. 2001;35:1431-1443.
36. Gladman JR, Harwood DM, Barer DH. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: prospective evaluation of five multivariate models and comparison with simple methods. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992; 55:347-351.
37. Stone SP, Allder SJ, Gladman JR. Predicting outcome in acute stroke. Br Med Bull. 2000;56:486-494.
38. Baird AE, Dambrosia J, Janket S, et al. A three-item scale for the early prediction of stroke recovery. Lancet. 2001;357(9274):2095-2099.