A broad requirement for TLS polymerases η and κ, and interacting sumoylation and nuclear pore proteins, in lesion bypass during C. elegans embryogenesis

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Roerink, Sophie F ^a   Koole, Wouter ^a   Stapel, L Carine ^a   Romeijn, Ron J ^a   Tijsterman, Marcel ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; NUCLEOPORIN; POLYMERASE H 1; POLYMERASE KAPPA 1; PROTOZOAL PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; POLH 1 PROTEIN, C ELEGANS; POLH-1 PROTEIN, C ELEGANS; POLK 1 PROTEIN, C ELEGANS; POLK-1 PROTEIN, C ELEGANS; PORIN; RADIOPROTECTIVE AGENT; SUMO PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA SYNTHESIS; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GAMMA IRRADIATION; GENE; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MAMMAL CELL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE H 1 GENE; POLYMERASE KAPPA 1 GENE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; SUMOYLATION; TRANSLESION SYNTHESIS; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECT; GAMMA RADIATION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR PORE; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CISPLATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GAMMA RAYS; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; NUCLEAR PORE; PORINS; RADIATION-PROTECTIVE AGENTS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; SUMOYLATION; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 84864057454     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002800     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ, (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40: 179-204 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019.
2. Nouspikel T, (2009) DNA repair in mammalian cells: Nucleotide excision repair: variations on versatility. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 994-1009 doi:10.1007/s00018-009-8737-y.
3. O'Farrell PH, Stumpff J, Su TT, (2004) Embryonic cleavage cycles: how is a mouse like a fly? Curr Biol 14: R35-R45.
4. Encalada SE, Martin PR, Phillips JB, Lyczak R, Hamill DR, et al. (2000) DNA replication defects delay cell division and disrupt cell polarity in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Developmental Biology 228: 225-238 doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9965.
5. Brauchle M, Baumer K, Gönczy P, (2003) Differential activation of the DNA replication checkpoint contributes to asynchrony of cell division in C. elegans embryos. Curr Biol 13: 819-827.
6. Holway AH, Kim S-H, La Volpe A, Michael WM, (2006) Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. The Journal of Cell Biology 172: 999-1008 doi:10.1083/jcb.200512136.
7. Andersen PL, Xu F, Xiao W, (2008) Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA. Cell Res 18: 162-173 doi:10.1038/cr.2007.114.
8. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L, (2005) Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 317-353 doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133250.
9. Waters LS, Minesinger BK, Wiltrout ME, D'Souza S, Woodruff RV, et al. (2009) Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73: 134-154 doi:10.1128/MMBR.00034-08.
10. Johnson RE, Kondratick CM, Prakash S, Prakash L, (1999) hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science 285: 263-265.
11. Kawamoto T, Araki K, Sonoda E, Yamashita YM, Harada K, et al. (2005) Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 20: 793-799 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.016.
12. McIlwraith MJ, Mcllwraith MJ, Vaisman A, Liu Y, Fanning E, et al. (2005) Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol Cell 20: 783-792 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.001.
13. Kim S-H, Michael WM, (2008) Regulated proteolysis of DNA polymerase eta during the DNA-damage response in C. elegans. Mol Cell 32: 757-766 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.016.
14. Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S, (2002) Role of human DNA polymerase kappa as an extender in translesion synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16000-16005 doi:10.1073/pnas.252524999.
15. Carlson KD, Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S, Washington MT, (2006) Human DNA polymerase kappa forms nonproductive complexes with matched primer termini but not with mismatched primer termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 15776-15781 doi:10.1073/pnas.0605785103.
16. Ogi T, Lehmann AR, (2006) The Y-family DNA polymerase kappa (pol kappa) functions in mammalian nucleotide-excision repair. Nat Cell Biol 8: 640-642 doi:10.1038/ncb1417.
17. Ogi T, Limsirichaikul S, Overmeer RM, Volker M, Takenaka K, et al. (2010) Three DNA Polymerases, Recruited by Different Mechanisms, Carry Out NER Repair Synthesis in Human Cells. Mol Cell 37: 714-727 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.009.
18. Haracska L, Kondratick CM, Unk I, Prakash S, Prakash L, (2001) Interaction with PCNA is essential for yeast DNA polymerase eta function. Mol Cell 8: 407-415.
19. Bienko M, Green CM, Crosetto N, Rudolf F, Zapart G, et al. (2005) Ubiquitin-binding domains in Y-family polymerases regulate translesion synthesis. Science 310: 1821-1824 doi:10.1126/science.1120615.
20. Kosarek JN, Woodruff RV, Rivera-Begeman A, Guo C, D'Souza S, et al. (2008) Comparative analysis of in vivo interactions between Rev1 protein and other Y-family DNA polymerases in animals and yeasts. DNA Repair 7: 439-451 doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.11.016.
21. Ohashi E, Hanafusa T, Kamei K, Song I, Tomida J, et al. (2009) Identification of a novel REV1-interacting motif necessary for DNA polymerase kappa function. Genes Cells 14: 101-111 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01255.x.
22. Cuppen E, Gort E, Hazendonk E, Mudde J, van de Belt J, et al. (2007) Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans: toward a knockout for every gene. Genome Res 17: 649-658 doi:10.1101/gr.6080607.
23. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L, (1999) Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta. Science 283: 1001-1004.
24. Masutani C, Araki M, Yamada A, Kusumoto R, Nogimori T, et al. (1999) Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) correcting protein from HeLa cells has a thymine dimer bypass DNA polymerase activity. EMBO J 18: 3491-3501 doi:10.1093/emboj/18.12.3491.
25. McDonald JP, Levine AS, Woodgate R, (1997) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene, a homologue of Escherichia coli dinB and umuC, is DNA damage inducible and functions in a novel error-free postreplication repair mechanism. Genetics 147: 1557-1568.
26. Astin JW, O'Neil NJ, Kuwabara PE, (2008) Nucleotide excision repair and the degradation of RNA pol II by the Caenorhabditis elegans XPA and Rsp5 orthologues, RAD-3 and WWP-1. DNA Repair 7: 267-280 doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.10.004.
27. Lans H, Marteijn JA, Schumacher B, Hoeijmakers JHJ, Jansen G, et al. (2010) Involvement of global genome repair, transcription coupled repair, and chromatin remodeling in UV DNA damage response changes during development. PLoS Genet 6: e1000941 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000941.
28. Youds JL, Barber LJ, Ward JD, Collis SJ, O'Neil NJ, et al. (2008) DOG-1 is the Caenorhabditis elegans BRIP1/FANCJ homologue and functions in interstrand cross-link repair. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1470-1479 doi:10.1128/MCB.01641-07.
29. Rattray AJ, Strathern JN, (2005) Homologous recombination is promoted by translesion polymerase poleta. Mol Cell 20: 658-659 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.018.
30. Boulton SJ, Martin JS, Polanowska J, Hill DE, Gartner A, et al. (2004) BRCA1/BARD1 orthologs required for DNA repair in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 14: 33-39.
31. Clejan I, Boerckel J, Ahmed S, (2006) Developmental modulation of nonhomologous end joining in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 173: 1301-1317 doi:10.1534/genetics.106.058628.
32. Chen C-CG, Simard MJ, Tabara H, Brownell DR, McCollough JA, et al. (2005) A member of the polymerase beta nucleotidyltransferase superfamily is required for RNA interference in C. elegans. Curr Biol 15: 378-383 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.009.
33. Plasterk RH, (1991) The origin of footprints of the Tc1 transposon of Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J 10: 1919-1925.
34. Roos WP, Kaina B, (2012) DNA damage-induced apoptosis: From specific DNA lesions to the DNA damage response and apoptosis. Cancer Lett doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.007.
35. van Haaften G, Romeijn R, Pothof J, Koole W, Mullenders LHF, et al. (2006) Identification of conserved pathways of DNA-damage response and radiation protection by genome-wide RNAi. Curr Biol 16: 1344-1350 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.047.
36. Altun ZF, Hall DH, (2009) Introduction to C. elegans anatomy. WormAtlas.
37. Schumacher B, Hanazawa M, Lee M-H, Nayak S, Volkmann K, et al. (2005) Translational repression of C. elegans p53 by GLD-1 regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Cell 120: 357-368 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.009.
38. Stergiou L, Doukoumetzidis K, Sendoel A, Hengartner MO, (2007) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is required for UV-C-induced apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ 14: 1129-1138 doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402115.
39. Edgar LG, McGhee JD, (1988) DNA synthesis and the control of embryonic gene expression in C. elegans. Cell 53: 589-599.
40. Holway AH, Hung C, Michael WM, (2005) Systematic, RNA-interference-mediated identification of mus-101 modifier genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 169: 1451-1460 doi:10.1534/genetics.104.036137.
41. Zhang H, Smolen GA, Palmer R, Christoforou A, van den Heuvel S, et al. (2004) SUMO modification is required for in vivo Hox gene regulation by the Caenorhabditis elegans Polycomb group protein SOP-2. Nat Genet 36: 507-511 doi:10.1038/ng1336.
42. Galy V, Mattaj IW, Askjaer P, (2003) Caenorhabditis elegans nucleoporins Nup93 and Nup205 determine the limit of nuclear pore complex size exclusion in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 14: 5104-5115 doi:10.1091/mbc.E03-04-0237.
43. Lee D-H, Pfeifer GP, (2008) Translesion synthesis of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine by DNA polymerase eta in vivo. Mutat Res 641: 19-26 doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.02.006.
44. Hirota K, Sonoda E, Kawamoto T, Motegi A, Masutani C, et al. (2010) Simultaneous disruption of two DNA polymerases, Polη and Polζ, in Avian DT40 cells unmasks the role of Polη in cellular response to various DNA lesions. PLoS Genet 6 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001151.
45. Akagi J-I, Masutani C, Kataoka Y, Kan T, Ohashi E, et al. (2009) Interaction with DNA polymerase eta is required for nuclear accumulation of REV1 and suppression of spontaneous mutations in human cells. DNA Repair 8: 585-599 doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.12.006.
46. Shachar S, Ziv O, Avkin S, Adar S, Wittschieben J, et al. (2009) Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J 28: 383-393 doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.281.
47. Ziv O, Geacintov N, Nakajima S, Yasui A, Livneh Z, (2009) DNA polymerase zeta cooperates with polymerases kappa and iota in translesion DNA synthesis across pyrimidine photodimers in cells from XPV patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 11552-11557 doi:10.1073/pnas.0812548106.
48. Fu D, Calvo JA, Samson LD, (2012) Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 104-120 doi:10.1038/nrc3185.
49. Palancade B, Doye V, (2008) Sumoylating and desumoylating enzymes at nuclear pores: underpinning their unexpected duties? Trends Cell Biol 18: 174-183 doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2008.02.001.
50. Palancade B, Liu X, Garcia-Rubio M, Aguilera A, Zhao X, et al. (2007) Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating Ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2912-2923 doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0123.
51. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Davidson MB, Roberts TM, (2008) Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322: 597-602 doi:10.1126/science.1162790.
52. Bermejo R, Capra T, Jossen R, Colosio A, Frattini C, et al. (2011) The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 146: 233-246 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.033.
53. Stavru F, Hülsmann BB, Spang A, Hartmann E, Cordes VC, et al. (2006) NDC1: a crucial membrane-integral nucleoporin of metazoan nuclear pore complexes. The Journal of Cell Biology 173: 509-519 doi:10.1083/jcb.200601001.
54. Brenner S, (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71-94.
55. Semple JI, Garcia-Verdugo R, Lehner B, (2010) Rapid selection of transgenic C. elegans using antibiotic resistance. Nat Methods 7: 725-727 doi:10.1038/nmeth.1495.
56. Fukushige T, Hendzel MJ, Bazett-Jones DP, McGhee JD, (1999) Direct visualization of the elt-2 gut-specific GATA factor binding to a target promoter inside the living Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 11883-11888.
57. Pontier DB, Tijsterman M, (2009) A robust network of double-strand break repair pathways governs genome integrity during C. elegans development. Curr Biol 19: 1384-1388 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.045.