My past and present as writing researcher and thoughts about the future of writing research

Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3-26

  Hayes, John R ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864038578     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 278-299.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Augsburger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities affecting transcription. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 123-141.
4. Berninger, V., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique variance. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161-196.
5. Berninger, V., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across the life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 193-218.
6. Berninger, V., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifications of Hayes and Flower's model to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children's writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57-81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.
8. Bond, S. J., & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Cues people use to paragraph text. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 147-167.
9. Bond, S. J., Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980, April). Translating the law into common language: A protocol study. Report No. 8, Document Design Project, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
10. Boole, G. (1854). The laws of thought. New York: Dover Press.
11. Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H., & Shimojo, S. (2006). The structure of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. American Naturalist, 167(5), E117-E139.
12. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
13. Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001 January). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80-98.
14. Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2003) The inner voice in writing. Written Communication, 20, 99-118.
15. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of verbal behavior, by Skinner. Language, 35, 26-58.
16. Christensen, C. A. (2004). Relationship between orthographic-motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well-structured text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 551-564.
17. Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479-492.
18. De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1995). Dictation: Applications to writing for students with learning disabilities. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disorders (Vol. 9, pp. 227-247). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19. Flower, L. S., Hayes, J. R., & Swarts, H. (1980, March). Reader-based revision of functional documents: The scenario principle. (Report No. 10, Document Design Project). Carnegie-Mellon University.
20. Fuller, D. F. (1995). Development of topic-comment algorithms and test structures in written compositions of students in grades one through nine. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.
21. Goel, V., Buchal, C., Frith, C., & Dolan, R. (2000). Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. Neuroimage, 12, 504-514.
22. Gregg, L., & Steinberg, E. (1980). Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1986). What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(1), 22-35.
24. Hatch, J. A., Hill, C. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1993). When the messenger is the message. Written Communication, 10(4), 569-598.
25. Hayes, J. R. (1985). Three problems in teaching general skills. In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp. 391-405). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new model of cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28-40). New York: Guilford.
28. Hayes, J. R. (2009). From idea to text. In D. Myhill (Ed.), Handbook of writing development (pp. 65-79). London: Sage.
29. Hayes, J. R. (2011, February). Reevaluating knowledge-telling: Modeling early writing development. Paper presented at Writing Research Across Borders II Conference, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
30. Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. (2010). Relationships between idea generation and transcription: How act of writing shapes what children write. In C. Bazerman, R. Krut, K. Lunsford, S. McLeod, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 166-180). New York: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
31. Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23, 135-149.
32. Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2007). Working memory in an editing task. Written Communication, 24(4), 283-294.
33. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in psycholinguistics. Vol. 2: Reading, writing, and language (pp. 176-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hayes, J. R., Hatch, J. A., & Silk, C. M. (2000). Does holistic assessment predict writing? Written Communication, 17(1), 3-26.
36. Hayes, J. R., & Nash, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 29-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1975). Understanding written problem instructions. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 167-200). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
38. Hayes, J. R., Waterman, D. A., & Robinson, C. S. (1977). Identifying the relevant aspects of a problem text. Cognitive Science, 1(3), 297-313.
39. Hayes, J. R., Young, R., Matchett, M., McCaffrey, M., Cochran, C., & Hajduk, T. (1992). Empirical research in literacy: The emerging rhetorical tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (Eds.). (2006). Motivation in writing. Amsterdam, Elsevier/ Emerald.
41. Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A historical survey. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
42. Jones, D. A., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-6.
43. Kaufer, D. S., Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(2), 121-140.
44. Kos, R., & Maslowski, C. (2001). Second graders' perception of what is important in writing. Elementary School Journal, 101, 567-585.
45. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
46. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1959). Report on a general problem-solving program. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing (pp. 256-264). Paris: UNESCO.
47. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1956). The logic theory machine. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, IT 2(3), 61-79.
48. Schriver, K. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1994). The impact of product complexity in using consumer electronics. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 76-84.
49. Schriver, K. A., Hayes, J. R., & Steffy, A. (1995). Reading the message of drug education literature: How teenagers' beliefs about the messenger shape interpretation. (Interim report). Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
50. Simon, H. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1976). The understanding process: Problem isomorphs. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 165-190.
51. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
52. Swaney, J. H., Janik, C. J., Bond, S. J., & Hayes, J. R. (1981, June). Editing for comprehension: Improving the process through reading protocols. (Technical Report No. 14, Document Design Project). Carnegie Mellon University.
53. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1979). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
54. Wallace, D., & Hayes, J. R. (1989). Redefining revision for freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(1), 54-66.